Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
To potentially be answered in an appeal in some future year down the road. Maybe move on in the meantime. It’s going to be a long wait.
And you just conceded the point - which was to convict him at any cost - regardless of whether reversible error occurred . . . or any violations of that pesky Constitution.
The problem is that it just isn't working out the way it was planned.
DP. You are delusional. Unclear why you believe Trump is above the law. Unclear why you don’t believe in the jury system. Unclear how you reconcile the reality of Trump losing hundreds of cases to date with this tale of “rigged”.
Trump is not likely to win on appeal but as an American he does have the right to appeal.
He also had the right to plea bargain which probably would not have led to a felony conviction. But Trump chose not to. He could have stipulated that he had extramarital relations with Ms Daniels and spared all Americans the shame of that testimony. But Trump chose not to. He could also have not called payments legal expenses and defrauded the NYS, and by extension the American, electorate. But Trump chose not to.
He’s a grownup and needs to take responsibility for his choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
To potentially be answered in an appeal in some future year down the road. Maybe move on in the meantime. It’s going to be a long wait.
And you just conceded the point - which was to convict him at any cost - regardless of whether reversible error occurred . . . or any violations of that pesky Constitution.
The problem is that it just isn't working out the way it was planned.
Anonymous wrote:“Former President Trump is preparing for a scenario where he will be unable to attend the Republican National Convention, a decision influenced in part by the possibility that he could be sentenced to home confinement after his historic conviction late last month.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/republican-national-committee-convention-trump-may-not-attend-rcna156838
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
To potentially be answered in an appeal in some future year down the road. Maybe move on in the meantime. It’s going to be a long wait.
And you just conceded the point - which was to convict him at any cost - regardless of whether reversible error occurred . . . or any violations of that pesky Constitution.
The problem is that it just isn't working out the way it was planned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
To potentially be answered in an appeal in some future year down the road. Maybe move on in the meantime. It’s going to be a long wait.
And you just conceded the point - which was to convict him at any cost - regardless of whether reversible error occurred . . . or any violations of that pesky Constitution.
The problem is that it just isn't working out the way it was planned.
Anonymous wrote:
To potentially be answered in an appeal in some future year down the road. Maybe move on in the meantime. It’s going to be a long wait.