Anonymous wrote:At this point stop sending fake ransom letters. We’re all getting fatigued by the rollercoaster.
The answer to the case is what benefit is an 84yo woman to whoever took her. She has more medical needs than they would. She isn’t physically able to do very much. Why pick her over the healthy appearing daughter or even son? Savannah would likely have a secure building or home, so she wasn’t picked.
Decode the mystery of who would want an 84yo? Why take her with you and not steal anything? Not jewelry, not her phone or electronics. Not clothing. Nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Savannah is a lawyer. Interesting to know. I wonder if this is related to legal advice she has given recently. Even if not in court, maybe a client on the side has a grudge.
Anonymous wrote:Savannah is a lawyer. Interesting to know. I wonder if this is related to legal advice she has given recently. Even if not in court, maybe a client on the side has a grudge.
Anonymous wrote:Savannah is a lawyer. Interesting to know. I wonder if this is related to legal advice she has given recently. Even if not in court, maybe a client on the side has a grudge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whenever a senior in fragile health lives alone — especially in a high value house — the home is at risk of being cased by delivery drivers, landscapers, security guards, neighbors, door to door salesmen, et al. And if it’s not them directly, it just takes them running their mouth to a desperate drug addict who won’t think twice about doing something extreme.
But the house wasn't robbed and Nancy's captors don't seem to know how to ask for a ransom in a credible way. So what was the point? This isn't a normal crime.
You’re trying to make sense of a suspect who is certainly mentally ill plus very likely addicted to hard narcotics — with nothing to lose. They are not rational. You can’t make sense of their behavior. Robberies, burglaries, and home invasions “turn bad” all the time. There’s a lot of wickedness out there and only a sliver of it ever even makes the news.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone needs to take a closer look at the kidnapper's coat. It's very unusual. Where did he get it? US brand? Mexican? Some specialty tactical gear?
The seam across the chest, sealed zippers, the thickness of the material (you can see this in the sleeves)....
I challenge any of you to find that coat online. (And no, it's not Nike, which is what everyone is saying.).
It looks like a FedEx jacket
It's not. Don't be sloppy.
Yes, Fedex has a stripe across the front, but it's wider than this one. They don't have sealed seams. They are not lined with fleece in the sleeve.
I wish I took a screenshot of it, but somebody identified the jacket in a comment on one of those Twitter threads. If I find it, I will come back and post the link. It was identical and it was not a brand that I know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone needs to take a closer look at the kidnapper's coat. It's very unusual. Where did he get it? US brand? Mexican? Some specialty tactical gear?
The seam across the chest, sealed zippers, the thickness of the material (you can see this in the sleeves)....
I challenge any of you to find that coat online. (And no, it's not Nike, which is what everyone is saying.).
It looks like a FedEx jacket
It's not. Don't be sloppy.
Yes, Fedex has a stripe across the front, but it's wider than this one. They don't have sealed seams. They are not lined with fleece in the sleeve.
DP. Glad we have you on the case! Have you shared this information with authorities? Surely they will be interested!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whenever a senior in fragile health lives alone — especially in a high value house — the home is at risk of being cased by delivery drivers, landscapers, security guards, neighbors, door to door salesmen, et al. And if it’s not them directly, it just takes them running their mouth to a desperate drug addict who won’t think twice about doing something extreme.
But the house wasn't robbed and Nancy's captors don't seem to know how to ask for a ransom in a credible way. So what was the point? This isn't a normal crime.
You’re trying to make sense of a suspect who is certainly mentally ill plus very likely addicted to hard narcotics — with nothing to lose. They are not rational. You can’t make sense of their behavior. Robberies, burglaries, and home invasions “turn bad” all the time. There’s a lot of wickedness out there and only a sliver of it ever even makes the news.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Everyone needs to take a closer look at the kidnapper's coat. It's very unusual. Where did he get it? US brand? Mexican? Some specialty tactical gear?
The seam across the chest, sealed zippers, the thickness of the material (you can see this in the sleeves)....
I challenge any of you to find that coat online. (And no, it's not Nike, which is what everyone is saying.).
It looks like a FedEx jacket
It's not. Don't be sloppy.
Yes, Fedex has a stripe across the front, but it's wider than this one. They don't have sealed seams. They are not lined with fleece in the sleeve.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whenever a senior in fragile health lives alone — especially in a high value house — the home is at risk of being cased by delivery drivers, landscapers, security guards, neighbors, door to door salesmen, et al. And if it’s not them directly, it just takes them running their mouth to a desperate drug addict who won’t think twice about doing something extreme.
But the house wasn't robbed and Nancy's captors don't seem to know how to ask for a ransom in a credible way. So what was the point? This isn't a normal crime.
You’re trying to make sense of a suspect who is certainly mentally ill plus very likely addicted to hard narcotics — with nothing to lose. They are not rational. You can’t make sense of their behavior. Robberies, burglaries, and home invasions “turn bad” all the time. There’s a lot of wickedness out there and only a sliver of it ever even makes the news.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone asking for 1 bitcoin ($66k) to give up identity of kidnapper..or whatever this is.
Why so low?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone asking for 1 bitcoin ($66k) to give up identity of kidnapper..or whatever this is.
Why so low?