Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

The player gets seen by all of the colleges that are there to see the team and the opponent. The colleges don’t stop looking when subs are made. Also coaches of high-level teams like that, rotate starters in showcases and in league games because usually everyone is a really good player, but only 11 can start.

You people are clueless! Either parents of mediocre, recruiting age players or parents of u littles that don’t have any of this experience yet. PP that said you should talk to parents of committed players within your club is right.

Top programs are not looking for backups.

You really don’t have a clue. Power 4 recruits come off the bench for top teams. Go watch VDA and RU 09.

The political charity selections for the training center that play in the GA aren’t going to top programs anyways.

If you’re 2010, where would you rather be? BSC or VDA without a training center invitation or would you rather be at Loudoun or SYC OR Alexandria with a training center invitation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

The player gets seen by all of the colleges that are there to see the team and the opponent. The colleges don’t stop looking when subs are made. Also coaches of high-level teams like that, rotate starters in showcases and in league games because usually everyone is a really good player, but only 11 can start.

You people are clueless! Either parents of mediocre, recruiting age players or parents of u littles that don’t have any of this experience yet. PP that said you should talk to parents of committed players within your club is right.

Top programs are not looking for backups.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

The player gets seen by all of the colleges that are there to see the team and the opponent. The colleges don’t stop looking when subs are made. Also coaches of high-level teams like that, rotate starters in showcases and in league games because usually everyone is a really good player, but only 11 can start.

You people are clueless! Either parents of mediocre, recruiting age players or parents of u littles that don’t have any of this experience yet. PP that said you should talk to parents of committed players within your club is right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Anonymous wrote:McLean is #1 GA in the area yet no kid going to either session.

Anonymous wrote:No matter who get selected, someone will be upset because their kids didn’t get it.

Anonymous wrote:No matter who get selected, someone will be upset because their kids didn’t get it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Richmond and VDA 09 rosters are 90% committed. It’s not just the starters, while starters at Arlington, Union, VRSC are uncommitted but probably went to training centers in the past.

So if your not getting playing time you will still get recruited by top school because the team is winning. Got it, glad that is cleared up.

Just because you’re not starting doesn’t mean you’re not playing. this is factual because commitments are posted. Do you know of any teams that are able to start 15 players?

Good luck when your DD is in the recruiting ages.

Most kids that are currently not starters move to other teams just to find out they are not starters on that team. The kids selected for the current ID are good players. Instead of making excuses for not being selected why not have your kid work harder and be happy for those that were selected. Quit making excuses.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Richmond and VDA 09 rosters are 90% committed. It’s not just the starters, while starters at Arlington, Union, VRSC are uncommitted but probably went to training centers in the past.

So if your not getting playing time you will still get recruited by top school because the team is winning. Got it, glad that is cleared up.

Just because you’re not starting doesn’t mean you’re not playing. this is factual because commitments are posted. Do you know of any teams that are able to start 15 players?

Good luck when your DD is in the recruiting ages.

Most kids that are currently not starters move to other teams just to find out they are not starters on that team. The kids selected for the current ID are good players. Instead of making excuses for not being selected why not have your kid work harder and be happy for those that were selected. Quit making excuses.

Sub at VDA/RU>full game player at Alexandria, SYC, VRSC, McLean, etc

The commitment data does not lie.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Richmond and VDA 09 rosters are 90% committed. It’s not just the starters, while starters at Arlington, Union, VRSC are uncommitted but probably went to training centers in the past.

So if your not getting playing time you will still get recruited by top school because the team is winning. Got it, glad that is cleared up.

Just because you’re not starting doesn’t mean you’re not playing. this is factual because commitments are posted. Do you know of any teams that are able to start 15 players?

Good luck when your DD is in the recruiting ages.

Most kids that are currently not starters move to other teams just to find out they are not starters on that team. The kids selected for the current ID are good players. Instead of making excuses for not being selected why not have your kid work harder and be happy for those that were selected. Quit making excuses.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Richmond and VDA 09 rosters are 90% committed. It’s not just the starters, while starters at Arlington, Union, VRSC are uncommitted but probably went to training centers in the past.

So if your not getting playing time you will still get recruited by top school because the team is winning. Got it, glad that is cleared up.

Just because you’re not starting doesn’t mean you’re not playing. this is factual because commitments are posted. Do you know of any teams that are able to start 15 players?

Good luck when your DD is in the recruiting ages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ID sessions are being watered down. Maybe it’s a top down approach since Emma Hayes is bringing in more talent for each adult US camp? But I don’t see how having twice as many kids called up this year from last year - - given the additional session — isn’t watering down the talent.

Your o e of the 4 parents who's kid does not get selected.

1st parent of kid that does not get selected says it's watered down

2nd parent is it's political

3rd parent it doesn't really matter at this age.

4th is my favorite. My kid is on such a good team it's really hard for scouts to notice because my kid is not a starter

4th is very true but not how you worded it. Being the best player on a bad team is good for training center invite but not good for college recruiting.

But in reference to not being a starter how does that kid get recruited for college? Does player hope the starter puts in a good word?

Richmond and VDA 09 rosters are 90% committed. It’s not just the starters, while starters at Arlington, Union, VRSC are uncommitted but probably went to training centers in the past.

So if your not getting playing time you will still get recruited by top school because the team is winning. Got it, glad that is cleared up.

Just because you’re not starting doesn’t mean you’re not playing. this is factual because commitments are posted. Do you know of any teams that are able to start 15 players?

Good luck when your DD is in the recruiting ages.