Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This judge is a piece of work.

He will not allow testimony from a former FEC chairman about what constitutes campaign contributions but he will allow testimony from a felon and serial liar about what is a legal NDA.

Yet another ground for appeal.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. And Trump will appeal because the court was too cold for his fragile bones anyway.

If the jury has been paying attention there will be no need for an appeal. Bragg and company have not identified a crime. In fact the one crimes we have heard about are those committed by Cohen. Including embezzlement

Anonymous wrote:This judge is a piece of work.

He will not allow testimony from a former FEC chairman about what constitutes campaign contributions but he will allow testimony from a felon and serial liar about what is a legal NDA.

Yet another ground for appeal.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. And Trump will appeal because the court was too cold for his fragile bones anyway.

Anonymous wrote:This judge is a piece of work.

He will not allow testimony from a former FEC chairman about what constitutes campaign contributions but he will allow testimony from a felon and serial liar about what is a legal NDA.

Yet another ground for appeal.

My god you are dumb.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is the above testimony credible?

Cohen just admitted to stealing from Trump.

This sounds like the trial is over and Trump is not guilty.

Sorry, but that just speaks to the general culture of the Trump Org. Everyone was a crook, including The Big Guy. No honor among thieves.

No, it sounds like Cohen is a lying scumbag. Cohen admitted on the stand to stealing from Trump.

Exactly. Cohen is the ultimate conman, and he wants a tv show. The perp belongs in jail.

Cohen is a democrat; I thought for sure he was a republican.

He was a republican while he was doing all his criming. In fact, he was the deputy finance chair of the Republican Party.

Anonymous wrote:This judge is a piece of work.

He will not allow testimony from a former FEC chairman about what constitutes campaign contributions but he will allow testimony from a felon and serial liar about what is a legal NDA.

Yet another ground for appeal.

Kangaroo court. Minus fun hoppy roos.

This judge is a piece of work.

He will not allow testimony from a former FEC chairman about what constitutes campaign contributions but he will allow testimony from a felon and serial liar about what is a legal NDA.

Yet another ground for appeal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is the above testimony credible?

Cohen just admitted to stealing from Trump.

This sounds like the trial is over and Trump is not guilty.

Sorry, but that just speaks to the general culture of the Trump Org. Everyone was a crook, including The Big Guy. No honor among thieves.

No, it sounds like Cohen is a lying scumbag. Cohen admitted on the stand to stealing from Trump.

Exactly. Cohen is the ultimate conman, and he wants a tv show. The perp belongs in jail.

Cohen is a democrat; I thought for sure he was a republican.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is the above testimony credible?

Cohen just admitted to stealing from Trump.

This sounds like the trial is over and Trump is not guilty.

Sorry, but that just speaks to the general culture of the Trump Org. Everyone was a crook, including The Big Guy. No honor among thieves.

No, it sounds like Cohen is a lying scumbag. Cohen admitted on the stand to stealing from Trump.

Exactly. Cohen is the ultimate conman, and he wants a tv show. The perp belongs in jail.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Is the above testimony credible?

Cohen just admitted to stealing from Trump.

This sounds like the trial is over and Trump is not guilty.

Sorry, but that just speaks to the general culture of the Trump Org. Everyone was a crook, including The Big Guy. No honor among thieves.

No, it sounds like Cohen is a lying scumbag. Cohen admitted on the stand to stealing from Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Is the above testimony credible?

Cohen just admitted to stealing from Trump.

This sounds like the trial is over and Trump is not guilty.

Sorry, but that just speaks to the general culture of the Trump Org. Everyone was a crook, including The Big Guy. No honor among thieves.

“The moment Michael Cohen said he is considering a bid for Congress
Trump's former fixer Michael Cohen admitted from the witness stand that he is considering a run for Congress.

The moment came during cross-examination on Monday.

'Going after President Trump, that's your name recognition?' Trump attorney Todd Blanche asked.

'My name recognition is because of the journey I've been on,' Cohen responded. 'It is affiliated with Mr. Trump, yes, not because of Mr. Trump.'

Blanche asked if the journey includes 'nearly daily attacks on President Trump?'

'Yes sir,' Cohen eventually said.”

Cohen would have been the perfect democrat for Congress. He would have fit right in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michael Cohen ADMITS to stealing tens of thousands of dollars from the Trump organization.

Remember when Democrats wanted HIM for President? Lol.

Specifically, name the Democrat who ever wanted Michael Cohen for President. You are nuts. Admittedly, there was cheering when he flipped on Trump but no one wanted him for president.

It seems like whatever you think flipping is is lying and stealing for financial gain. It sounds like Cohen is a liar and Daniels is as well. Even Avenatti says Daniels is a liar.

Is the above testimony credible?

Cohen just admitted to stealing from Trump.

This sounds like the trial is over and Trump is not guilty.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They may call a former FEC chairman, but the judge has unsurprisingly placed huge limits on what he can testify to.

Yes, unsurprising because any FEC expert unfamiliar with the facts of this case is going to advise the jury on the law. Judges advise juries on the law, not expert witnesses. In this trial and in every trial.

Merchan seems to have only a passing acquaintance with the law.
The FEC chairman has expertise as it pertains to campaign contributions. You would think most judges would want the jury to hear that expertise.
Unless of course, it exonerates the person Merchan wants to be found guilty.

Precisely.

100 years?! If he gets convicted and is one of the small percentage who get jail time, it’s likely to be less than 6 months.