Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why was Barbara Kanninen reTweeting an ad for teachers to apply to Virtual Virginia on Monday or Tuesday, August 30th or 31st? Did she not know there was a staffing shortage in the VLP?
She is a very political. I don't think she would have reTweeted that unless she didn't know then about VLP's staffing problems.
How could she not know?
Anonymous wrote:Why was Barbara Kanninen reTweeting an ad for teachers to apply to Virtual Virginia on Monday or Tuesday, August 30th or 31st? Did she not know there was a staffing shortage in the VLP?
She is a very political. I don't think she would have reTweeted that unless she didn't know then about VLP's staffing problems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hilarious how APE had to get its 2 cents into the article. Trying to stay relevant I guess?
I'm still laughing at APE "demands."
Of course you demand APE, that's all you know how to do!
I'm a VLP parent and I do not want APE speaking for me. Sit down, APE. We know you don't support virtual learners.
I'm not APE, but I absolutely don't support the 90%+ of non-medical kids who are in the program. The parents are not following the science and now our medical kids are suffering because of the anti-science views of these parents.
Homeschool works for evangelicals and it should work or these parents of non-med kids with their fervent fire-and-brimstone quasi-religious beliefs on COVID (is delta similar to the second coming?).
Nice try APE! took a break from trolling on Arl now to come back here and impersonate a parent of a kid with a medical condition. We don’t talk like that.
Please stop hiding behind medical children. Very few of the kids enrolled in the virtual program have to be enrolled in it because of medical reasons.
You don’t know that. Did you personally survey every family?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hilarious how APE had to get its 2 cents into the article. Trying to stay relevant I guess?
I'm still laughing at APE "demands."
Of course you demand APE, that's all you know how to do!
I'm a VLP parent and I do not want APE speaking for me. Sit down, APE. We know you don't support virtual learners.
I'm not APE, but I absolutely don't support the 90%+ of non-medical kids who are in the program. The parents are not following the science and now our medical kids are suffering because of the anti-science views of these parents.
Homeschool works for evangelicals and it should work or these parents of non-med kids with their fervent fire-and-brimstone quasi-religious beliefs on COVID (is delta similar to the second coming?).
Nice try APE! took a break from trolling on Arl now to come back here and impersonate a parent of a kid with a medical condition. We don’t talk like that.
Please stop hiding behind medical children. Very few of the kids enrolled in the virtual program have to be enrolled in it because of medical reasons.
You don’t know that. Did you personally survey every family?
Anonymous wrote:I don't think APS has accurate data on the % of medically vulnerable kids, so I don't think the numbers people are citing here are accurate. Maybe people are assuming SPED = medically vulnerable? My kids are medically at risk. When we signed up for VLP last Spring I remember a question about why we were choosing VLP. I could only choose one even though more than one reason applied to us. I don't remember which one I chose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hilarious how APE had to get its 2 cents into the article. Trying to stay relevant I guess?
I'm still laughing at APE "demands."
Of course you demand APE, that's all you know how to do!
I'm a VLP parent and I do not want APE speaking for me. Sit down, APE. We know you don't support virtual learners.
I'm not APE, but I absolutely don't support the 90%+ of non-medical kids who are in the program. The parents are not following the science and now our medical kids are suffering because of the anti-science views of these parents.
Homeschool works for evangelicals and it should work or these parents of non-med kids with their fervent fire-and-brimstone quasi-religious beliefs on COVID (is delta similar to the second coming?).
Nice try APE! took a break from trolling on Arl now to come back here and impersonate a parent of a kid with a medical condition. We don’t talk like that.
Please stop hiding behind medical children. Very few of the kids enrolled in the virtual program have to be enrolled in it because of medical reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hilarious how APE had to get its 2 cents into the article. Trying to stay relevant I guess?
I'm still laughing at APE "demands."
Of course you demand APE, that's all you know how to do!
I'm a VLP parent and I do not want APE speaking for me. Sit down, APE. We know you don't support virtual learners.
I'm not APE, but I absolutely don't support the 90%+ of non-medical kids who are in the program. The parents are not following the science and now our medical kids are suffering because of the anti-science views of these parents.
Homeschool works for evangelicals and it should work or these parents of non-med kids with their fervent fire-and-brimstone quasi-religious beliefs on COVID (is delta similar to the second coming?).
Nice try APE! took a break from trolling on Arl now to come back here and impersonate a parent of a kid with a medical condition. We don’t talk like that.