Anonymous wrote:Is anyone going to explain why 8th graders are not allowed to take Geometry??? What is the reasoning?
Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of boosters on here but there are some real concerns that need to be addressed for those of us who are investing a lot of money in an education that is perceived to be incredible but in reality is just not. Nothing can be done because parents are afraid to speak up and the division heads won’t make any changes. We have two DD at Holton and will be looking elsewhere in the fall. It’s a sad state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So.. most of this argument is about whether kids are allowed to take Geometry in 8th grade or not?
Yes, and only 9 girls were in geometry in 8th grade this year. Nowhere close to the 25% claimed by some on this thread.
What's the big deal? NCS had zero in geometry in 8th. These schools do not accelerate kids in math like the public's do. If you want acceleration, public is the way to go.
That is a false statement. Many of the independent schools, as well as the religious schools do this. Landon does as well. They may have 5-8 kids in a classroom. Why do you suggest public school when parents are looking to get a better education by paying $50k for private school?
Maybe because most public schools are better LOL
We did both, math and science no question. Public rocks.
Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of boosters on here but there are some real concerns that need to be addressed for those of us who are investing a lot of money in an education that is perceived to be incredible but in reality is just not. Nothing can be done because parents are afraid to speak up and the division heads won’t make any changes. We have two DD at Holton and will be looking elsewhere in the fall. It’s a sad state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:23:04 - you say on the one hand that the accusations are specific and not vague, and on the other the school doesn’t share details. I disagree, but since you think they are specific, please share from the post what is specific and not vague about claimed “poor financial decisions”? Likewise, “annual fund is so sad” - both inaccurate on its face, but again, explain the specifics of what is sad about it, since participation and $$ are up? How is this statement not vague and supported by specific information? Final, would love the “specific” details on the “reputation overhaul” that you read that clearly have gone over my head. We look forward to your response.
Take a look at the schools Annual Report, CPA certified statements, and other public filings and docs. You will be very upset when you see where $$ are spent. And if you can't find them, you will realize just how un-transparent the school is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:23:04 - you say on the one hand that the accusations are specific and not vague, and on the other the school doesn’t share details. I disagree, but since you think they are specific, please share from the post what is specific and not vague about claimed “poor financial decisions”? Likewise, “annual fund is so sad” - both inaccurate on its face, but again, explain the specifics of what is sad about it, since participation and $$ are up? How is this statement not vague and supported by specific information? Final, would love the “specific” details on the “reputation overhaul” that you read that clearly have gone over my head. We look forward to your response.
Take a look at the schools Annual Report, CPA certified statements, and other public filings and docs. You will be very upset when you see where $$ are spent. And if you can't find them, you will realize just how un-transparent the school is.
Anonymous wrote:23:04 - you say on the one hand that the accusations are specific and not vague, and on the other the school doesn’t share details. I disagree, but since you think they are specific, please share from the post what is specific and not vague about claimed “poor financial decisions”? Likewise, “annual fund is so sad” - both inaccurate on its face, but again, explain the specifics of what is sad about it, since participation and $$ are up? How is this statement not vague and supported by specific information? Final, would love the “specific” details on the “reputation overhaul” that you read that clearly have gone over my head. We look forward to your response.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So.. most of this argument is about whether kids are allowed to take Geometry in 8th grade or not?
Yes, and only 9 girls were in geometry in 8th grade this year. Nowhere close to the 25% claimed by some on this thread.
What's the big deal? NCS had zero in geometry in 8th. These schools do not accelerate kids in math like the public's do. If you want acceleration, public is the way to go.
That is a false statement. Many of the independent schools, as well as the religious schools do this. Landon does as well. They may have 5-8 kids in a classroom. Why do you suggest public school when parents are looking to get a better education by paying $50k for private school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Offered spots at NCS and Holton. Very good schools either way. Holton’s campus and stellar Administration sealed the deal. HoS listens at Holton.
This made me laugh! The administration at Holton does not listen at all. And the HoS is so cold and fake. We once loved this school but don’t anymore. It makes me sad to write that but I have to be honest.