Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible she's getting mental health treatment away from prying eyes in Monaco? True she doesn't look well.
Yeah, she doesn't look well, at all. Even her hair is thinning.
And obvious from an incredibly bad photo angle. What was she thinking releasing that photo?!
She's in charge of her own social media. A lot of these royals would be a complete mess if they had to do anything themselves, Charlene included.
She definitely has input into which photos get released.
Anonymous wrote:Aww man I feel bad and with the speculation too that can’t be healthy. Honestly I wonder if she has a horrible terminal disease and is trying to help fix and cutting her hair is part of it like a bad cancer and a way to let the kids down easy. She doesn’t look healthy at all, i think this goes beyond usual marital strife and gossip.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible she's getting mental health treatment away from prying eyes in Monaco? True she doesn't look well.
Yeah, she doesn't look well, at all. Even her hair is thinning.
And obvious from an incredibly bad photo angle. What was she thinking releasing that photo?!
She's in charge of her own social media. A lot of these royals would be a complete mess if they had to do anything themselves, Charlene included.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible she's getting mental health treatment away from prying eyes in Monaco? True she doesn't look well.
Yeah, she doesn't look well, at all. Even her hair is thinning.
And obvious from an incredibly bad photo angle. What was she thinking releasing that photo?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it possible she's getting mental health treatment away from prying eyes in Monaco? True she doesn't look well.
Yeah, she doesn't look well, at all. Even her hair is thinning.
Anonymous wrote:This really is the strangest story. She is well enough to participate in service projects but not well enough to fly back to Monaco? She clearly doesn't want to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Does he care about being civil though? He kind of seems like he viewed her as a brood mare to get some appropriate heirs and has never stopped having kids out of wedlock and bedding other women. She has no leverage whatsoever.
I never understood this marriage to begin with. She never looks happy. He is who he is. They certainly courted long enough, you can't say she was pressured to marry him. Why? Why marry?
Reports at the time of their wedding said that Charlene tried to bolt but her passport was confiscated and she was persuaded to go through with it. She looked like she had seen a ghost all throughout the ceremony.
I think it defies belief that someone strong enough to make an Olympic team could be forced to go along with anything. What possible leverage would Albert have over her if she said no? Do you really think he could hold her prisoner indefinitely? If he did at all? Do you think maybe the sparkles of royalty did their thing? Despite Albert's glaring faults, a royal prince could easily, EASILY find many many willing brides.
I think you are being really naive.
All right, please explain how someone like Charlene can be forced to marry someone like Albert? What leverage would he have over her?
He's been paying off her family and her support for 20 years that's how. If he called in those debts they (the South African family) would be destitute. It's not like Charlene had a career at all. She didn't even medal in the Olympics which would have gotten her some lucrative Phelps-level sponsorships.
Anonymous wrote:Is it possible she's getting mental health treatment away from prying eyes in Monaco? True she doesn't look well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why can't they reach a civilized arrangement where they live close by but lead separate lives? They they can both raise their children and be at peace.
Does he care about being civil though? He kind of seems like he viewed her as a brood mare to get some appropriate heirs and has never stopped having kids out of wedlock and bedding other women. She has no leverage whatsoever.
I never understood this marriage to begin with. She never looks happy. He is who he is. They certainly courted long enough, you can't say she was pressured to marry him. Why? Why marry?
Reports at the time of their wedding said that Charlene tried to bolt but her passport was confiscated and she was persuaded to go through with it. She looked like she had seen a ghost all throughout the ceremony.
I think it defies belief that someone strong enough to make an Olympic team could be forced to go along with anything. What possible leverage would Albert have over her if she said no? Do you really think he could hold her prisoner indefinitely? If he did at all? Do you think maybe the sparkles of royalty did their thing? Despite Albert's glaring faults, a royal prince could easily, EASILY find many many willing brides.
I think you are being really naive.
All right, please explain how someone like Charlene can be forced to marry someone like Albert? What leverage would he have over her?
Anonymous wrote:^^^
https://people.com/royals/princess-charlene-shares-photos-from-surgery-recovery/