Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear more about the tent science? Because closed tents are like buildings but without ventilation
Tents don't need to be closed. Look at the picture that was shared. Go check out Landon's campus, or St Albans. Small colleges all over the country also have been using them.
Again, in December?! We live in the here and now
You are just moving the goalposts. There have been non-stop defenders of the school (presumably you are among them) who have shouted up and down that the school has been doing a great job. Emphasis on has been. Now, you want to move on because that's in the past. If you would admit that the school has handled this terribly for the past three months, then perhaps we could establish a consensus upon which we could discuss where things should go from here.
Anonymous wrote:Who’s not traveling or socializing over the holidays? Many are in fact. I’m sure now there are many additional reasons such as the sustained community spread at record levels. The one constant is that time and time again the schools that reopened found that parents were dishonest and household behaviors a massive weak link in their safe campus policies. You know that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear more about the tent science? Because closed tents are like buildings but without ventilation
Tents don't need to be closed. Look at the picture that was shared. Go check out Landon's campus, or St Albans. Small colleges all over the country also have been using them.
Again, in December?! We live in the here and now
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear more about the tent science? Because closed tents are like buildings but without ventilation
Tents don't need to be closed. Look at the picture that was shared. Go check out Landon's campus, or St Albans. Small colleges all over the country also have been using them.
Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear more about the tent science? Because closed tents are like buildings but without ventilation
Anonymous wrote:I’d love to hear more about the tent science? Because closed tents are like buildings but without ventilation
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m lost as to what the pro-open, contra-admin, people on this board actually want? What is the ideal scenario, in the situation the USA and DC are in now? Really confused, since it’s been non stop complaining even during the HL. To reopen, you have to put in the hard yards first.
We want them to put up more.. wait for it ..TENTS and then make everyone especially those receiving salaries go in person .. pandemic schmandemic
Anonymous wrote:I’m lost as to what the pro-open, contra-admin, people on this board actually want? What is the ideal scenario, in the situation the USA and DC are in now? Really confused, since it’s been non stop complaining even during the HL. To reopen, you have to put in the hard yards first.
Anonymous wrote:I’m lost as to what the pro-open, contra-admin, people on this board actually want? What is the ideal scenario, in the situation the USA and DC are in now? Really confused, since it’s been non stop complaining even during the HL. To reopen, you have to put in the hard yards first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. It’s “who” not “whom”. If you can’t see the irony in your statement, not much space to discuss. I’ve never seen people trying to steamroll over the consensus (which was DL this semester) over and over again (except for Trump election nonsense), and yet feel perma-aggrieved even after having forced the school to reopen.
Irony in asserting that someone is not reflecting Quaker values in declaring that families should leave the school simply because they find fault in the administration’s handling of this entire situation and are willing to point it out? Please.
And there was never a consensus for distance learning this semester. That’s the most ridiculous thing I have heard. The plan through August was always hybrid from the get-go. And then when Bryan announced that this would not be happening, the consensus was always that the school was working towards implementing hybrid as quickly as it could do so in a safe manner. The problem was that they were completely mismanaging their efforts. But there was never a consensus against hybrid. Unless, of course, the “consensus” was secret and not communicated to families.
What are you so salty about? No one steamrolled any consensus. The school was just frozen administratively and incapable at getting their act together. Which parents were rightly frustrated about, since they had been promised hybrid all summer and fall.
Do you not have friends? Good to get some to discuss things with; it’s not a bad practice to talk
things through and take the edge of the snark before posting. Maybe people would take you more seriously.
Utter nonsense. It’s been a clear, logical set of steps and a consistent decision-making model, linear enough for anyone to follow. The only variables were the unmitigated pandemic spread and the parents forcing a U-turn half-way through. Could we have in hindsight had Sep-Oct on campus more safely? Perhaps, in hindsight. Not now. We and our friends see no signs of the “frozen admin” or cause to be “rightly frustrated”. Everyone’s doing their best for our children and community. It’s that simple.
So pompous. We and our friends haha.
+1. And they’re not looking very hard.