Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Blue Lives Matter too. There are incidents of police being assaulted by non-police.
How many assaults does it take to get a movement?
When police stop playing judge, jury, and executioner.
Anonymous wrote:No one said there was something "wrong" with black lives matter. The poster was asking what's wrong with "all lives matter".

Anonymous wrote:Blue Lives Matter too. There are incidents of police being assaulted by non-police.
How many assaults does it take to get a movement?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This has been explained and discussed throughout this thread. Go look.
NP here: none of the tortured logic and mental gymnastics in the prior pages explain why “all lives” matter is somehow racist.
It is not racist.
When there is a breast cancer fundraiser, no one complains that "all cancers matter." And when there is a nursing conference no one complains that "all professions matter." And yet, when there is a a movement to address police brutality that impacts the black community more than others, people take personal offense as if it somehow implies that other lives don't matter. This is the essence of racism, and it's worth examining why you feel the need to generalize this issue to "all lives" but not in other cases. This sort of double standard is the essence of racism.
PP here: This is the best explanation I have heard yet. Thank you! (I honestly wasn't seeking to stir the pot or create an argument. I just wanted to understand. For some reason, DCUM posters can be so mean. There is no need to jump down everyone's throat just for asking questions. Doing so just shows ones ignorance.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This has been explained and discussed throughout this thread. Go look.
NP here: none of the tortured logic and mental gymnastics in the prior pages explain why “all lives” matter is somehow racist.
It is not racist.
When there is a breast cancer fundraiser, no one complains that "all cancers matter." And when there is a nursing conference no one complains that "all professions matter." And yet, when there is a a movement to address police brutality that impacts the black community more than others, people take personal offense as if it somehow implies that other lives don't matter. This is the essence of racism, and it's worth examining why you feel the need to generalize this issue to "all lives" but not in other cases. This sort of double standard is the essence of racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Genuinely asking, why is "All Lives Matter" such a negative term? It seems accurate and inclusive of all groups and races.
This has been explained and discussed throughout this thread. Go look.
NP here: none of the tortured logic and mental gymnastics in the prior pages explain why “all lives” matter is somehow racist.
It is not racist.
