Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Austin has zero experience. Not qualified for the job period.
President Obama had zero executive experience and that seemed to turn out well.
Anonymous wrote:Austin has zero experience. Not qualified for the job period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
No, he's not. It's an endorsement, not marionettery. Is Steve Austin running as Robin Ficker's puppet?
We know what voting the Apple Ballot has gotten us over the years. I'm definitely not voting for anyone the teacher's union endorses.
OK, then don't. No need to throw "puppet" accusations around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
This! It's why I'm voting for Austin. He's definitely the candidate the union fears most.
he's also the one who wants status quo for overcrowded schools.
You are a liar. Austin doesn't want the status quo for overcrowded schools, and he's made that extremely clear. However, he doesn't want socio-economic diversity to be given priority over other factors when adjusting boundaries, because this will lead to students having to travel excessive distances to schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
This! It's why I'm voting for Austin. He's definitely the candidate the union fears most.
he's also the one who wants status quo for overcrowded schools.
You are a liar. Austin doesn't want the status quo for overcrowded schools, and he's made that extremely clear. However, he doesn't want socio-economic diversity to be given priority over other factors when adjusting boundaries, because this will lead to students having to travel excessive distances to schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
This! It's why I'm voting for Austin. He's definitely the candidate the union fears most.
he's also the one who wants status quo for overcrowded schools.
You are a liar. Austin doesn't want the status quo for overcrowded schools, and he's made that extremely clear. However, he doesn't want socio-economic diversity to be given priority over other factors when adjusting boundaries, because this will lead to students having to travel excessive distances to schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
This! It's why I'm voting for Austin. He's definitely the candidate the union fears most.
he's also the one who wants status quo for overcrowded schools.
You are a liar. Austin doesn't want the status quo for overcrowded schools, and he's made that extremely clear. However, he doesn't want socio-economic diversity to be given priority over other factors when adjusting boundaries, because this will lead to students having to travel excessive distances to schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
This! It's why I'm voting for Austin. He's definitely the candidate the union fears most.
he's also the one who wants status quo for overcrowded schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
No, he's not. It's an endorsement, not marionettery. Is Steve Austin running as Robin Ficker's puppet?
We know what voting the Apple Ballot has gotten us over the years. I'm definitely not voting for anyone the teacher's union endorses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
No, he's not. It's an endorsement, not marionettery. Is Steve Austin running as Robin Ficker's puppet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
This! It's why I'm voting for Austin. He's definitely the candidate the union fears most.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.
Dasgupta is running as the Teacher's Union puppet. Definitely not an option for me. It doesn't matter what he says.... when you collect that union endorsement, you are in their pocket. It's just the way it works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The least bad of those 2 is Dasgupta. However, there are no good candidates of the top 4 getting any press (Austin, Dasgupta, Guan, Harris). 1 is a disrupter and 3 are the status quo.
Alternatively, 1 wants to maintain the status quo, and 3 want to change it, in different ways.