
Anonymous wrote:I know - he was! That was then. His jv level PR games haven’t helped his looks, probably just for me. He seems spoiled and ugly and small.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:William is UGLY. He ain’t got no alibi. Not because he’s bald but because he looks like a goofy brat. Anyway, his alleged mistress’s husband is much more attractive, and all of the “waity Katy” stuff, the criticisms of Meghan Markle, and the reporting of how much William spends make him seem like such a loser to me. He’s not fun, he’s not smart, he’s always moping and glum, and he's got a face like a foot. So...if he is, I hope Kate’s got a good, hot, discreet, boyfriend, or that she’s genuinely unbothered.
I remember when he looked like this. He was a handsome little man.
Anonymous wrote:William is UGLY. He ain’t got no alibi. Not because he’s bald but because he looks like a goofy brat. Anyway, his alleged mistress’s husband is much more attractive, and all of the “waity Katy” stuff, the criticisms of Meghan Markle, and the reporting of how much William spends make him seem like such a loser to me. He’s not fun, he’s not smart, he’s always moping and glum, and he's got a face like a foot. So...if he is, I hope Kate’s got a good, hot, discreet, boyfriend, or that she’s genuinely unbothered.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember at the polo match, when Kate was running and running in her dress, and you think she's going to go greet Will? And she greets some other guy standing next to him? Practically blushing?
Get you some, kate!
No!! Link?
It was better/easier linked to at the time. All of the usual British Royal watching sites hosted the vid.
Now, it’s on those weird you tube channels with the robotic/disconnected sounding voices.
Here’s one of them: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EPkx1R1mBkw
Comment on the robotic voices: one of the ladies who does this sounds like a robot, but at points she adds so much emotion into her voice, that it can’t be machine-read. Just so weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the age of social media. No person now gets away with cheating as easily as Charles did. If Will is stupid enough to do that then there will be either outrage in the media, or Kate can play the field too. In any case, the kids will suffer and the public will wonder why there needs to be a monarchy. So it is entirely up to Will to do the right thing.
The third kid was a mistake for Will and Kate, even though they have a team of nannies.
Why was #3 a mistake?
RE the social media thing, I think the palaces think they can keep a lid on it and it they can’t. They contacted two separate reporters to take down allegations on Twitter re the affair.
You would too if it’s a lie.
So, do we have a Kavanaugh or a Northam here?
Does the allegation and the denial of the allegation mean it DID happen (a Kavanaugh), or the denial mean Northam is innocent and fighting a nasty claim?
(Im an I and have found the illogic of the last year slightly amusing)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember at the polo match, when Kate was running and running in her dress, and you think she's going to go greet Will? And she greets some other guy standing next to him? Practically blushing?
Get you some, kate!
No!! Link?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kate will be Queen Consort and the mother of the Prince of Wales someday and Meghan will only be a Duchess. Rose won’t even be a footnote.
I’m sure that’s what they said about Diana, Camilla, and Sarah.
Thirty years later Diana is still not Queen, also dead, and divorced. Also not a mother of a King.
Camilla is the future Queen, alive and on the arm of the Prince of Wales.
Sarah is a cheater and laughingstock but accepted by the Royals.
If Diana had not divorced Charles, she would be Queen Consort and alive. Kate came into the marriage much more mature and prepared than 19 year old Shy Di.
Diana didn’t divorce Charles. HE divorced her and stripped her of everything. She begged him to stop seeing Camilla, treating her like a fool (inviting Diana to dinner with Camilla and Camilla’s husband), and be a good husband.
He couldn’t or wouldn’t. The compulsion was too strong.
Also, she was crazy.
I keep reading here that Diana was crazy, but I was too young to really have any idea what she was actually like. How was she crazy?
When your husband cheats on you and lies about it, it really does make you crazy. BTDT
except Diana was actually diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and bulimia - she genuinely had psychological issues independent of her POS husband
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kate will be Queen Consort and the mother of the Prince of Wales someday and Meghan will only be a Duchess. Rose won’t even be a footnote.
I’m sure that’s what they said about Diana, Camilla, and Sarah.
Thirty years later Diana is still not Queen, also dead, and divorced. Also not a mother of a King.
Camilla is the future Queen, alive and on the arm of the Prince of Wales.
Sarah is a cheater and laughingstock but accepted by the Royals.
If Diana had not divorced Charles, she would be Queen Consort and alive. Kate came into the marriage much more mature and prepared than 19 year old Shy Di.
Diana didn’t divorce Charles. HE divorced her and stripped her of everything. She begged him to stop seeing Camilla, treating her like a fool (inviting Diana to dinner with Camilla and Camilla’s husband), and be a good husband.
He couldn’t or wouldn’t. The compulsion was too strong.
Also, she was crazy.
I keep reading here that Diana was crazy, but I was too young to really have any idea what she was actually like. How was she crazy?
When your husband cheats on you and lies about it, it really does make you crazy. BTDT
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:![]()
She is quite pretty
Is that a joke?
Here is her photo spread for Tatler:
https://www.tatler.com/gallery/when-rose-hanbury-modelled-for-tatler?utm_medium=email&utm_source=Tatler+About+Town&utm_campaign=Tatler+About+Town_2019-03-29&utm_content=Meghan+Markle+has+divided+-+but+has+she+conquered%3F&utm_source=Adestra&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Tatler%20About%20Town%20280319&utm_content=Meghan%20Markle%20has%20divided%20-%20but%20has%20she%20conquered%3F