Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Look at the transcript from yesterday and read any of the dozens of statements Dems have put out. Dems are happy to give money for real border security. But they won’t give one penny for trump’s stupid wall.

Fat Donnie is the reason we can’t have progress on border security.

From what I've read, the Democrats are offering temporary, reversible actions. They are opposed to a permanent solution, like a border wall.

Ever heard of a ladder or tunnels?

How is the Israel wall 99.9% effective in the face of tunnels and ladders?

It's not. Just this week, another tunnel network was discovered.

I’ll happily trade you a stupid wall for gun reform and Medicare for all!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Look at the transcript from yesterday and read any of the dozens of statements Dems have put out. Dems are happy to give money for real border security. But they won’t give one penny for trump’s stupid wall.

Fat Donnie is the reason we can’t have progress on border security.

From what I've read, the Democrats are offering temporary, reversible actions. They are opposed to a permanent solution, like a border wall.

Ever heard of a ladder or tunnels?

How is the Israel wall 99.9% effective in the face of tunnels and ladders?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Look at the transcript from yesterday and read any of the dozens of statements Dems have put out. Dems are happy to give money for real border security. But they won’t give one penny for trump’s stupid wall.

Fat Donnie is the reason we can’t have progress on border security.

From what I've read, the Democrats are offering temporary, reversible actions. They are opposed to a permanent solution, like a border wall.

Dems offered a budget that allocated an additional $1.3 billion for border security. That sounds plenty serious to me. But trump’s going to drive us into a ditch because he wants to build a stupid wall.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Look at the transcript from yesterday and read any of the dozens of statements Dems have put out. Dems are happy to give money for real border security. But they won’t give one penny for trump’s stupid wall.

Fat Donnie is the reason we can’t have progress on border security.

From what I've read, the Democrats are offering temporary, reversible actions. They are opposed to a permanent solution, like a border wall.

Ever heard of a ladder or tunnels? A wall is not a solution The only people who think this wall is a great idea are those who stand to gain from government contracts to build the wall. And P.S. Trump promised Mexico would pay for the wall. What's happened to his promise?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Look at the transcript from yesterday and read any of the dozens of statements Dems have put out. Dems are happy to give money for real border security. But they won’t give one penny for trump’s stupid wall.

Fat Donnie is the reason we can’t have progress on border security.

From what I've read, the Democrats are offering temporary, reversible actions. They are opposed to a permanent solution, like a border wall.

A wall isn't a permanent solution.

Judging by all the FEMA headquarters staff hanging out in Starbucks the government is already partially shut down.

Isn't Mexico supposed to pay for the wall?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Look at the transcript from yesterday and read any of the dozens of statements Dems have put out. Dems are happy to give money for real border security. But they won’t give one penny for trump’s stupid wall.

Fat Donnie is the reason we can’t have progress on border security.

From what I've read, the Democrats are offering temporary, reversible actions. They are opposed to a permanent solution, like a border wall.

Anonymous wrote:Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Why don't Trumpsters make Trump keep his promise to make MX pay for the wall, and not US taxpayers?

Why don't Rs want more strict gun control if it even makes our society slightly more safer?

Why why why?

Anonymous wrote:Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Look at the transcript from yesterday and read any of the dozens of statements Dems have put out. Dems are happy to give money for real border security. But they won’t give one penny for trump’s stupid wall.

Fat Donnie is the reason we can’t have progress on border security.

Last time, Trump was holding DACA Dreamer kids hostage, so Dems were willing to give trump money to save them. But trump’s a bad negotiator, so he lost the hostage and didn’t get the money. This time, trump’s got nothing but his tiny toadstool in his hand, so Dems should give him absolutely nothing for that stupid wall. Go play with your toadstool, you fat POS.

Why are Democrats so opposed to making it even slightly more difficult for illegals to come in? Are they representing U.S. citizens or foreigners breaking our laws?

Looks like DJT should have taken Schumer's offer last year of $25B for the wall.

Trump is now reduced to begging for scraps. He was pleading for $5B yesterday and Chuck & Nancy said "no." Sad.

Even nut job tea party radicals like Ann Coulter know that Pelosi kicked Trump’s ass:

Coulter wrote:

“In 3 minutes, with the press watching, Nancy Pelosi & Chuck Schumer tricked Trump to switch from talking about "the wall" to ‘border security.’”

“Even a Washington Post reporter knows that not 1 inch of Trump's wall has been built. Does Trump think his supporters are dumber than a WaPo reporter?”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But wait...Trump said MEXICO would pay for the Wall.

Shumer and Pelosi should have reminded him of this and asked what happened?

They did and Trump mumbled some nonsense about Mexico paying through the new trade deals. It's there in the meeting transcript.

They should bring this up every time Trump wants to fund his wall

The financial benefit of USMCA over NAFTA is between 275B and 750B depending on your source. The full wall is 25B.

Mexico has already paid for it.

Then why is Fat Nixon asking for funding?