Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disruptive kids go the principals office in private school. Plus parents are called.
Disruptive students get "counseled out", i.e., expelled, in private school. Which doesn't actually fix the problem, it just makes it somebody else's problem.
which ends up being the public schools' problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disruptive kids go the principals office in private school. Plus parents are called.
Disruptive students get "counseled out", i.e., expelled, in private school. Which doesn't actually fix the problem, it just makes it somebody else's problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disruptive kids go the principals office in private school. Plus parents are called.
Disruptive students get "counseled out", i.e., expelled, in private school. Which doesn't actually fix the problem, it just makes it somebody else's problem.
Anonymous wrote:
Internet access available as part of Comcast program; recycled computers available from nonprofits. Public library; school library. If people would stop making excuses, people would step up (if they have drive and ability). If they have no drive or ability, it won't matter how much money you spend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to send my kids to tutoring until I realized how much free, guided, enrichment is available online.
This isnt about money, its cultural.
It takes money to have a computer and high speed internet access.
The school should provide access to the needed content without having to resort to outside instruction.
Moreover, people are using culture here to describe parental apathy. It could be that a parent who is uneducated themselves doesn't know that outside instruction is necessary in "one of the best school systems in the country". I suppose that a parent's low level of education may be cultural, but it's not apathy. If a parent is busy working 2 jobs trying to keep food on the table and a roof overhead, they are not apathetic, even if they don't have a lot of time to provide outside enrichment.
I was a SAH mom. I volunteered in schools. I provided all the types of enrichment that have been described in this thread I am about as far from apathetic as a parent can be. I was shocked and appalled at how much instruction I had to provide because of MCPS deficiencies. I had the benefit of a strong education in a public school. It had some weaknesses, but it was so much stronger on the fundamentals, which meant that I could identify and address problems as they came up. When we bought our house, school quality was a primary concern. I assumed I would have to occasionally answer a homework question or quiz my child on spelling words. I never envisioned that I would have to become a reading/grammar/math/science/social studies teacher.
I've met parents with struggling students, none of whom were indifferent to their child's education. Yes, I'm sure there are some apathetic, neglectful parents. (I strongly suspect you'll find some of those even in high SES brackets.) However, I think most are trying, like the rest of us, to help our kids to the best of our abilities, even if those abilities vary widely.
The purpose of public schools is to offer a free education to all children, regardless of their parents capabilities and/or interest in educating their children. If you felt it necessary to provide a tutor or online tutor equivalent for your children, then I think it has failed in that purpose. Thank goodness you understood your childrens' needs and had the knowledge required to get them the necessary help.
Anonymous wrote:Disruptive kids go the principals office in private school. Plus parents are called.
Anonymous wrote:Way to stay on task people
Anonymous wrote:This thread seems to think that only poor kids are disruptive. I work at a private school and... no. There are disruptive kids everywhere. When you have a couple dozen kids in a room and a few of them are very disruptive, it can derail a whole class. This is called Children.
You may not remember it from when you were a kid, but they were there then too. Some of them were forced to go to special ed schools back then, and there is more mainstreaming now, which educators believe is a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have SN child - GTLD with very high IQ. Generally nonviolent, but who would love to misbehave if he gets support of class or another clown. Why not to have fun instead of studying if teacher lets it go or cannot control class? He will use absolutely every opportunity due to immaturity.
The only environment this kid can learn is regular magnet (not GTLD one). The reason is - magnet kids are more accommodating and pushing this kid to learn instead of fulling around with other clowns all day.
Basically in any non-magnet class my child goes for lowest common denominator in work and behavior.
This is in support that mixing kids is really bad idea.
If you will put my child in mixed class, he will learn nothing... On the other hand he is not disruptive in magnet environment. He is absolutely disruptive (non-violently) in regular environment.
For us magnet is life saver, otherwise my child would get nothing out of public education in MCPS. I am sure that there are many kids like mine, but most of them did not get to magnet.
Probably most of them are fulling around our public systems and will end up with zero knowledge.
Oh, cry me a friggin' river! My responsible, mature, high IQ child didn't even get into a magnet. If your genius is 'fulling' around in public school, send him to private. Other children who are there to learn should have to suffer because your 'clown' wants to have fun!
Geez.