Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did I read there’s a separate trial for punitive damages? Please no more. That judge has shown so much restraint. I would punch him the nose mid- lie.
Not a separate trial. A separate decision. That will be given tomorrow (Friday).
+1 and there’s a statutory cap on punitive damages so the max is $40M.
So the jury awarded as much as they possibly could. Good.
Why is there a cap? He deserves to be forced to lick latrines clean as his only source of food for the rest of his life. Very disappointed it's that low.
Because Texas doesn’t like plaintiffs.
Because juries have been too crazy in the past.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did I read there’s a separate trial for punitive damages? Please no more. That judge has shown so much restraint. I would punch him the nose mid- lie.
Not a separate trial. A separate decision. That will be given tomorrow (Friday).
+1 and there’s a statutory cap on punitive damages so the max is $40M.
So the jury awarded as much as they possibly could. Good.
Why is there a cap? He deserves to be forced to lick latrines clean as his only source of food for the rest of his life. Very disappointed it's that low.
Because Texas doesn’t like plaintiffs.[/quote
Because juries have been too crazy in the past.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did I read there’s a separate trial for punitive damages? Please no more. That judge has shown so much restraint. I would punch him the nose mid- lie.
Not a separate trial. A separate decision. That will be given tomorrow (Friday).
+1 and there’s a statutory cap on punitive damages so the max is $40M.
So the jury awarded as much as they possibly could. Good.
Why is there a cap? He deserves to be forced to lick latrines clean as his only source of food for the rest of his life. Very disappointed it's that low.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:45.2 million
Just to one family!! That’s amazing and I’m proud of those Sandy hook families for standing up for truth. Although jones’ court appointed accountant testified that he received like $9 mn in crypto Donations so I don’t know how they’re going to be able to track his funds since he’s so shady.
Anonymous wrote:45.2 million
Anonymous wrote:Will the families really see any money?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did I read there’s a separate trial for punitive damages? Please no more. That judge has shown so much restraint. I would punch him the nose mid- lie.
Not a separate trial. A separate decision. That will be given tomorrow (Friday).
+1 and there’s a statutory cap on punitive damages so the max is $40M.
So the jury awarded as much as they possibly could. Good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did I read there’s a separate trial for punitive damages? Please no more. That judge has shown so much restraint. I would punch him the nose mid- lie.
Not a separate trial. A separate decision. That will be given tomorrow (Friday).
+1 and there’s a statutory cap on punitive damages so the max is $40M.
So the jury awarded as much as they possibly could. Good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did I read there’s a separate trial for punitive damages? Please no more. That judge has shown so much restraint. I would punch him the nose mid- lie.
Not a separate trial. A separate decision. That will be given tomorrow (Friday).
+1 and there’s a statutory cap on punitive damages so the max is $40M.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did I read there’s a separate trial for punitive damages? Please no more. That judge has shown so much restraint. I would punch him the nose mid- lie.
Not a separate trial. A separate decision. That will be given tomorrow (Friday).
+1 and there’s a statutory cap on punitive damages so the max is $40M.
Anonymous wrote:Did Reynal personally give Bankston the texts or could it have been some paralegal/assistant who had nothing to lose/hated Alex Jobes so they were like “f*%# it” and “accidentally” gave the texts?
https://abovethelaw.com/2022/08/alex-joness-lawyer-face-plants-in-epic-discovery-fail/
Who among us hasn’t forwarded the entire contents of our client’s phone to opposing counsel? And then ignored that counsel’s written notice of the mistaken transmission, allowing our client to be ignominiously impeached on the witness stand?
“Your attorneys messed up,” Bankston told Jones on the witness stand. “Twelve days ago they sent me your whole phone, and that is how I know you lied to me about not having any messages about Sandy Hook.”
Apparently, Reynal put the digital copy of Jones’s iPhone in a shared Dropbox folder, and then blew it off when Bankston sent a HEY, IDIOT notice. And now, it’s too late.
Bankston then went on to pull out texts about Sandy Hook, something that opposing counsel said did not exist. Ditto for emails, immediately disproving Jones’s testimony about not having an email account. And Jones’s vamping about his skimpy profit margins couldn’t survive the introduction of a glowing memo from Jones’s bookkeeper about all the money they were raking in on prepper meals.
“I must have dictated that to my assistant,” Jones mumbled, when confronted with incontrovertible proof that he does in fact use email.
Faced with Bankston’s demand to read a text from Infowars host Paul Joseph Watson referring to Sandy Hook, Jones remembered that he was “ill” and was overtaken by a coughing fit.
At the conclusion of Jones’s testimony, Reynal sat quietly staring at his hands and contemplating his life choices while Bankston’s team slapped him on the back and congratulated him.
“You know what nobody’s talked about yet?” Bankston said next to what he surely knew was a hot mike. “What happens when that phone goes to law enforcement?”