Anonymous wrote:The school board IS planning to build a 4th high school, just not a comprehensive school with fields and full facilities. But it's current plan has funding for a school facility with 1,300 seats.
Personally, I think we need a 4th comprehensive school given the numbers we're looking at, but to say that the board isn't planning on building a fourth school isn't strictly true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The conclusion is they need a 4th high school. Within the next few years. Period.
Keep telling APS and ACB that!!
Anonymous wrote:The conclusion is they need a 4th high school. Within the next few years. Period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like this is a complete waste of time? I watched the video of tonight's SB meeting, and it seems like a pretty impossible task to figure all of this out w/n the next month or so. Why don't they tell us their proposals and let the community comment on them? The part at the end where they said you should grab a sticky note and put it next to the board with 1 of the 6 criteria seemed so pointless. They really have time to collect all of the physical notes and some how incorporate that into the decision making process?
It is so infuriating to hear that APS has projected above average growth (they mentioned something tonight about gaining 900 plus students in recent years which is the equivalent of an entire ES)[/u] and yet some how the CB is deliberately ignoring this issue.[u]
Yes. This is the dumbest thing I've heard. Having a bunch of yentas move around and banish certain blocks that have nothing to do with their home address.
No wonder nothing ever gets solved in this County and we still haven't solved the middle school problem either.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else feel like this is a complete waste of time? I watched the video of tonight's SB meeting, and it seems like a pretty impossible task to figure all of this out w/n the next month or so. Why don't they tell us their proposals and let the community comment on them? The part at the end where they said you should grab a sticky note and put it next to the board with 1 of the 6 criteria seemed so pointless. They really have time to collect all of the physical notes and some how incorporate that into the decision making process?
It is so infuriating to hear that APS has projected above average growth (they mentioned something tonight about gaining 900 plus students in recent years which is the equivalent of an entire ES) and yet some how the CB is deliberately ignoring this issue.
Anonymous wrote:Obvious sock puppetingnwith the potty mouthed poster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard the collective is the YHS zone that is fighting against diversifying and adding brown kids to their school. They are out in force on these boards minority bashing.
They are the ones arguing to get the million dollar home white kids over to their school so they won't have more apartment kids bussed over.
+100
Anonymous wrote:I heard the collective is the YHS zone that is fighting against diversifying and adding brown kids to their school. They are out in force on these boards minority bashing.
They are the ones arguing to get the million dollar home white kids over to their school so they won't have more apartment kids bussed over.
Anonymous wrote:The County sucks and schools continue to deteriorate. People are complacent and self-congratulatory living in their delusional world.
I agree with LV lady, if we had less pussies on the County & School Boards we wouldn't find ourselves in the over-crowded mess we currently have.
They've been "in discussions" about this since my 13-year old was in Kindergarten.
More outrage would be a good thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you guys are so upset about overcrowding, you should be happy to be redirected to Wakefield. It's a beautiful new building with room.
Not my problem.
Walking units should not be moved. Period.
Sorry, but someone is getting moved and there other important considerations.
We are white. We don't meet the important considerations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you guys are so upset about overcrowding, you should be happy to be redirected to Wakefield. It's a beautiful new building with room.
Not my problem.
Walking units should not be moved. Period.
Sorry, but someone is getting moved and there other important considerations.