Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Karl Lagerfrld disses Kim for flaunting jewels on social media:
As even more harrowing details of Kim Kardashian’s armed hotel room robbery come out, there still are many questions that remain unanswered. And one of them comes from her friend (and sometime photographer) Karl Lagerfeld, the creative director of Chanel. After his robot-heavy show Tuesday morning, he asked aloud how the star could have let such a thing happen.
“It’s a very bad thing for Paris, but I don’t understand why she was in a hotel with no security and things like this,” the Kaiser, 83, told reporters. “If you’re that famous and you put all your jewelry on the net, you go to hotels where nobody can come near to the room. You cannot display your wealth and then be surprised that some people want to share it with you.”
Burn.
Hahahahaha. Ok that made me laugh out loud.But I still feel bad for her.
Flaunting wealth and sex tapes---definitely not classy, just assy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Karl Lagerfrld disses Kim for flaunting jewels on social media:
As even more harrowing details of Kim Kardashian’s armed hotel room robbery come out, there still are many questions that remain unanswered. And one of them comes from her friend (and sometime photographer) Karl Lagerfeld, the creative director of Chanel. After his robot-heavy show Tuesday morning, he asked aloud how the star could have let such a thing happen.
“It’s a very bad thing for Paris, but I don’t understand why she was in a hotel with no security and things like this,” the Kaiser, 83, told reporters. “If you’re that famous and you put all your jewelry on the net, you go to hotels where nobody can come near to the room. You cannot display your wealth and then be surprised that some people want to share it with you.”
Burn.
Hahahahaha. Ok that made me laugh out loud.But I still feel bad for her.
Anonymous wrote:Look, as a woman, I'm mighty proud of her. Men are usually making a fortune off of women, ala the Hugh Hephner, Bob Guccioni, Larry Flynts of the world. Before Ray J could make money off her, she beat him to it. Good for her for not going into hiding and becoming a victim. She may not have come into her notoriety easy, but who has she hurt in the process? Absolutely no one. I just don't understand how so many of you women can hate a total stranger who has hurt no one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are saying that a tape she did over 10 years ago should define her? She hasn't done one since and in no way promotes it as something young girls should do. Kim has never said it was okay to do the tape or that others should emulate her. She has often said that she regretted it even though it has bought her fame.
Let.it.go.
What's funny is that many of the women slut-shaming Kim K has probably given many a drunken blowjob or sloppy sex session to some random guy in college. But, it's not on tape so it's cool.
My hat is off to that family's hustle. They know how to make a dollar!
Anonymous wrote:Karl Lagerfrld disses Kim for flaunting jewels on social media:
As even more harrowing details of Kim Kardashian’s armed hotel room robbery come out, there still are many questions that remain unanswered. And one of them comes from her friend (and sometime photographer) Karl Lagerfeld, the creative director of Chanel. After his robot-heavy show Tuesday morning, he asked aloud how the star could have let such a thing happen.
“It’s a very bad thing for Paris, but I don’t understand why she was in a hotel with no security and things like this,” the Kaiser, 83, told reporters. “If you’re that famous and you put all your jewelry on the net, you go to hotels where nobody can come near to the room. You cannot display your wealth and then be surprised that some people want to share it with you.”
Burn.
But I still feel bad for her.Anonymous wrote:Look, as a woman, I'm mighty proud of her. Men are usually making a fortune off of women, ala the Hugh Hephner, Bob Guccioni, Larry Flynts of the world. Before Ray J could make money off her, she beat him to it. Good for her for not going into hiding and becoming a victim. She may not have come into her notoriety easy, but who has she hurt in the process? Absolutely no one. I just don't understand how so many of you women can hate a total stranger who has hurt no one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you are saying that a tape she did over 10 years ago should define her? She hasn't done one since and in no way promotes it as something young girls should do. Kim has never said it was okay to do the tape or that others should emulate her. She has often said that she regretted it even though it has bought her fame.
Let.it.go.
What's funny is that many of the women slut-shaming Kim K has probably given many a drunken blowjob or sloppy sex session to some random guy in college. But, it's not on tape so it's cool.
My hat is off to that family's hustle. They know how to make a dollar!
Anonymous wrote:So you are saying that a tape she did over 10 years ago should define her? She hasn't done one since and in no way promotes it as something young girls should do. Kim has never said it was okay to do the tape or that others should emulate her. She has often said that she regretted it even though it has bought her fame.
Let.it.go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She lied about her sex tape "leak."
The truth is, she and her mom, Kris Jenner, SOLD her sex tape to pornographer Vivid Entertainment, Inc.
That fact is right in Ism Halpern's best selling biography "Kardashian Dynasty." And if that fact is untrue, then why haven't any of the Kardashians sued Halpern? (Maybe because truth is an absolute defense).
And yet, Kim and Kris keep telling the lie that it was "leaked." (Bullshit!).
So there's ample reason to believe this robbery could well have been faked.
It is not victim-blaming to question whether there even was a victim, given Kim's total lack of credibility.
The tape was going to be leaked by the ex-boyfriend. They made a deal to sell it since it was going to come out anyway. If they sell it, then it's in their court on their terms. I'd do the same thing if something that embarrassing was going to be coming out either way.
I think it's kind of weird to harbor so much hate for people on TV that you've never met or known and most of you say you have not even watched on TV. Weird.
Yeah they're rich, yeah they're famous. Lots of people leaked sex tapes (Paris Hilton, Pam Anderson, that Teen Mom star) and none of them has turned such an embarrassing moment around to their benefit like the Kardashians. They have great business acumen and know how to hustle. They work for that money and fame day in, day out. Can't knock that.
And all this hate and they don't even know the real story! And while I would not want that to be my origin story, KK took hold of this and let it make her a millionaire many many many times over AND brought her family along for the ride. So good for her. She couldn't stop the video, but she won in the end.
And that's why so many women on DCUM and beyond hate this total stranger. She did what so many of them wish they could do, but cannot. Turn a turnip into a sweet fulfilling watermelon.
+1
Well said.
It may surprise you to find out that many people don't admire those who engage in porn and/or prostitution as a way to make a buck or millions.
You may not admire Kim or her huslte, but was she supposed to do? Go sit in a corner and cry? She turned things around and if they play their cards right, they'll be swimming in money for generations.
I don't understand why people think she would fake this incident. Kim doesn't need ways to stay in the news. She is the news. Maybe not your news but everything she does is news. To millions.
At least you admit she's a fucking porn star who successfully profited from porn. What's wrong with porn right.
You've got issues. Try therapy.
+1 slutshaming is never the high ground. Unclench PP and snatch that stick out your hindparts