Anonymous wrote:What a mean spirited thread. But this being DCUM, I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is harder to raise children in an affluent society because there is less of a family community. My DH was raised in a developing country and his mother worked. An older relative of his mother's brother in law offered to stay with her kids, for free, so she could work. She was an older lady and she didn't mind. According to DH, it all went very smoothly. Would your brother in law's older aunt want to stay with your kids for free? It's just not something I can imagine happening in a wealthier society.
People do that at all income levels in the USA if they live near each other. Get off the MY COUNTRY stuff.
I don't know, I haven't seen that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is harder to raise children in an affluent society because there is less of a family community. My DH was raised in a developing country and his mother worked. An older relative of his mother's brother in law offered to stay with her kids, for free, so she could work. She was an older lady and she didn't mind. According to DH, it all went very smoothly. Would your brother in law's older aunt want to stay with your kids for free? It's just not something I can imagine happening in a wealthier society.
People do that at all income levels in the USA if they live near each other. Get off the MY COUNTRY stuff.
Anonymous wrote:I have no problem offing myself peacefully & responsibly when the time comes. And no kids to worry about upsetting! I just hope for a terminal diagnosis so I can go to a state/country where it is legal instead of having to do it under the table.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think anyone has answered this but does this mean modern human life disproves darwin/survival of the fittest?
If modern life's "winners" are the ones procreating the least, doesn't that fly against the face of millions of years of genetic coding?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is an interesting discussion. I don't know very many married white affluent women with no kids. And I knew a few white affluent never married women who decided to parent on their own. I know lots and lots and lots of black educated and professional women with no kids, mostly because they aren't partnered. I am black, educated and professional but divorced and when I was married we had to go the IVF/ICSI route for kids because of my husband's health issues. Didn't work. The idea that I might be stereotyped as the single black welfare mom has been hard for me to shake so I haven't opted to go it alone. Plus -- and more importantly -- my parents were married when they had me and my parents' parents were married when they had children and my great grandparents were married when they had children and I think children need two parents.
I think it's sad that you are willing to let perceptions of your family structure rob you of becoming a mom. Ten/twenty years from now, you're going to regret giving a darn what people think.
NP here. I am a black woman who adopted a child on my own in my late 30s. Have I been stereotyped as a welfare mom a few times in the past ten years? Sure, and it sucked (especially because i was certain I earned more money than the people making that judgment about me). But, I have also had ten years of parenting an absolutely wonderful child. If you truly want to parent a child, please don't let other people's opinions keep you from doing it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the fuck did you people buy a home with a mortgage near $4500/month?
That's your first problem.
Because we can.
Well then, you decided this was more of a priority than having kids, which is what PP posters were saying.
I can afford both but I don't want to waste the money on kids.
So instead you'll be wasting it on someone cleaning your ass when you're drooling in your wheelchair?
yeah - seems like a great trade off
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the fuck did you people buy a home with a mortgage near $4500/month?
That's your first problem.
Because we can.
Well then, you decided this was more of a priority than having kids, which is what PP posters were saying.
I can afford both but I don't want to waste the money on kids.
We make $200K and we have 4 children and $800 in student loans and a $2200 month mortgage and they go to private school/nanny share. It is absolutely doable and to say "I cant afford it" is absolutely ridiculous.
If you don't want them, fine. If you want them, but don't want to make any changes to your lifestyle, fine. But be honest with yourself and us if you are posting here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the fuck did you people buy a home with a mortgage near $4500/month?
That's your first problem.
Because we can.
Well then, you decided this was more of a priority than having kids, which is what PP posters were saying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why the fuck did you people buy a home with a mortgage near $4500/month?
That's your first problem.
Because we can.