Anonymous wrote:I think in our case their non-gift giving has affected our relationship. Even my husband thought it strange. It's a whole host of things really, but the lack of wedding gift was one of the more egregious. It's a bit sad, I had hoped to have a very close relationship with them.
Anonymous wrote:Do you know it even used to be considered tacky to enclose RSVP cards and envelopes? It implied that you thought the invited person was such a yokel that she wouldn't know to reply or have her own stationery. Now it's considered helpful. I believe the notes about registries and gifts are now considered "helpful." That doesn't mean you have to follow it, or consider it tasteful.
Times change. I think the days are gone when everyone you knew followed the same rules and knew the standard places couples registered.
When I go to a wedding, if money is the gift they prefer, money is what I give them. I know in a lot of cultures it's the polite custom. Who am I to say my culture is superior?
Just don't get me started on people who have big all-out weddings when it's not their first marriage. Now that's tacky.
Anonymous wrote:Every single wedding invitation we have received in the US has mentioned multiple registries right on the paper invitation and also on the website. I have also received links to registries for baby showers. I don't see how any of this is more refined than saying "no boxed gifts".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous
I think in our case their non-gift giving has affected our relationship. Even my husband thought it strange. It's a whole host of things really, but the lack of wedding gift was one of the more egregious. It's a bit sad, I had hoped to have a very close relationship with them.
How is the lack of wedding gift preventing you from having a close relationship with them? I don't understand this requirement of no money for wedding = no future relationship. I would guess the in-laws probably see your greedy ways and decided not to waste money on someone that they will never have a relationship with.
Anonymous
I think in our case their non-gift giving has affected our relationship. Even my husband thought it strange. It's a whole host of things really, but the lack of wedding gift was one of the more egregious. It's a bit sad, I had hoped to have a very close relationship with them.
PAnonymous wrote:Every single wedding invitation we have received in the US has mentioned multiple registries right on the paper invitation and also on the website. I have also received links to registries for baby showers. I don't see how any of this is more refined than saying "no boxed gifts".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Snarkiness aside, would one generally not expect gifts from close family in the US? I'm genuinely curious.
No one should expect anything from anyone for any occasion. Period. It's rude and tacky. You accept what is given to you with a smile and a thank you.
Anonymous wrote:My husband's family did not give us anything. Let alone enough cash.
I think the point of this thread was gifting conventions in India, which is the topic I have tried to address. Of course this will include generalizations and things that are not true in 100% of cases. I have a hard time believing that gifts are not expected at weddings in the US, especially since it is a gift obsessed culture in general.
Parsing posts word by word is not something I want to do and I'm really not sure what it achieves.
Anonymous wrote:Snarkiness aside, would one generally not expect gifts from close family in the US? I'm genuinely curious.
Anonymous wrote:My husband's family did not give us anything. Let alone enough cash.
I think the point of this thread was gifting conventions in India, which is the topic I have tried to address. Of course this will include generalizations and things that are not true in 100% of cases. I have a hard time believing that gifts are not expected at weddings in the US, especially since it is a gift obsessed culture in general.
Parsing posts word by word is not something I want to do and I'm really not sure what it achieves.