Anonymous wrote:This thread is just insane. I have a kid in an upper grade and another who went through the upper grades. We are very pleased with the level of rigor. The reading and writing can be expanded infinitely depending on the skill set of the student.
I just signed 3 field trip forms for visits to museums. DC loves the art class.
Some of the kids are misbehaved. As far as I can tell, they have acted exactly the same way since Kindergarten at least. Their parents don't seem to be particularly bothered by it. They are not necessarily above average or even average so I doubt it's because all of them are so wildly bored.
We know several out of bounds kids in the upper grades and some more who left for 5th grade. They were all well-behaved, smart kids who lived on or near the Hill. 3 of DC's best friends are OOB, AA, smart, hard-working, with fabulous, involved parents.
The teachers in the upper grades have all ranged from extremely good to jaw-dropping fantastic to me. Almost every single one of them has gone way beyond what is strictly their job to help their students. I have always felt like issues were addressed.
I know more than 1 doctor who has a kid at Brent, but of course there are all sorts of professions represented. Including teachers, at least 1 police officer, the security guard at the school's kid, many government workers, professors, social workers, therapists, just thinking off the top of my head.
The Chinese teacher can't keep control of the class, like many language teachers in many schools. The playground is rather chaotic and it's just a matter of time before someone gets more hurt than they already have.
Brent is nowhere near perfect because even the most wonderful private school is not perfect. It is a very solid school where I feel comfortable sending my child every day. Like many other posters, I have absolutely zero interest in living in Upper NW.
If there are Brent parents who are less thrilled, they should (A) work to improve the resources for more advanced kids and (B) remember that Brent has gone from a failing, Title I school with some great students and teachers but a lot of problems to a solid school in less than a decade. I am not particularly to be thanked for that, but I certainly thank those who made it happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is currently in K (and we're totally happy with the program). I guess I don't understand what happens in first and above. I mean, the cohort - all high-SES kids of highly educated parents - remains the same. Are upper grades slaves to some DCPS curriculum that is way too easy for this cohort? If DCPS is mandating some curriculum, wouldn't it be the same at all schools, including the much touted JKLMM? I mean, these are all kids of lawyers, doctors, nuclear physicists, etc., - they are ALL pretty smart. Are posters saying that Brent utterly fails to meet these kids' smarts starting in first?
I think only 1-2 people are saying that. It has not been my experience or the experience of other parents I know with children who are in first and above.
Fifth grade is a problem, but that is because of the middle school situation, not Brent.
Anonymous wrote:I'm glad to hear that your son enjoys art class. This does not change rhe fact that, as reflected in the PTA survey comducted last Spring, there is room for substantial improvement and better coordination with other curricula. The National Gallery is only a 20 minute walk from Brent and yet our children have yet to take a field trip there in the past three years. Forget about the Corcoran snd Philips, or even the Sackler, Renwick, or Portrait Gallery. Don't forget, art instruction is mandated and funded by DCPS, as opposed to science, which Brent is really fortunate to have due to the gemerosity of parents.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is currently in K (and we're totally happy with the program). I guess I don't understand what happens in first and above. I mean, the cohort - all high-SES kids of highly educated parents - remains the same. Are upper grades slaves to some DCPS curriculum that is way too easy for this cohort? If DCPS is mandating some curriculum, wouldn't it be the same at all schools, including the much touted JKLMM? I mean, these are all kids of lawyers, doctors, nuclear physicists, etc., - they are ALL pretty smart. Are posters saying that Brent utterly fails to meet these kids' smarts starting in first?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As has already been pointed out, discipline becomes more of an issue as kids go up the chain at Brent because the curriculum is geared toward remedial education, vs. the advanced work most of the kids, who are high SES with professional parents, need. Bored kids have a strong tendency to behave badly in class, space out, or both.
The principal shows little interest in taking the problem seriously, or even acknowledging it. IMO, most long-time parents have been passive about pushing back. The PTA and LSAT need to work to keep those who do challenge from being branded as pesky helicopter parents, and from burning out, and pulling out. Also, Brent needs to develop ties to the JKLM schools to learn how to bend the DCPS curriculum and test prep culture to work for advnced kids. Murch seems particularly adept at furnishing upper grades challenge.
I think you need to take your ax to grind to the school and off of DCUM.
+1. Better yet would be for you to move to NW instead of just wishing you lived there.
Anonymous wrote:Better yet, have Brent consult JKLM on how they do things to increase challenge. Refrain from mocking those who want more JKLM-type quality here in SE. You move to NW.