Anonymous wrote:I really don't see how this is becoming a partisan issue. Pretty sad that the left is defending this move.
It is going to be controversial when you (1) release prisoners of war when the war is still ongoing and (2) when you praise a deserter.
Personally, I'm ok with exchanging the prisoners but can see where there would be legitimate 2nd guessing. But I'm not ok with making this guy out to be a hero and hope he faces charges.
This became a partisan issue when you nut jobs made it one. You and your kind are just disgusting. You have tried and convicted this soldier in the press to score political points and the people doing it did every thing they could to avoid service- think Cheney, Beck, O'Reilly, Rush etc. You say Bergdahi got others killed, while just brushing over all the military member killed and wounded in Iraq, a war that you republican lied us in to. Calling the POWs exchanged terrorist, while republicans release over 500 with the same classification and who fought against after release. Yep let's roll some more interviews of the soldiers who served with Bergdahi saying we should not have got him back b/c he didn't drink beer with us. I am sick of you fucks. You have crossed the line. Fuck you hope you and your kind burn in hell.
Anonymous wrote:This became a partisan issue when you nut jobs made it one. You and your kind are just disgusting. You have tried and convicted this soldier in the press to score political points and the people doing it did every thing they could to avoid service- think Cheney, Beck, O'Reilly, Rush etc. You say Bergdahi got others killed
No. Actually, it is his squad and team members who are saying that he got others killed.
By the way, Bush had nothing to do with this. Afghanistan is Obama's war.
This became a partisan issue when you nut jobs made it one. You and your kind are just disgusting. You have tried and convicted this soldier in the press to score political points and the people doing it did every thing they could to avoid service- think Cheney, Beck, O'Reilly, Rush etc. You say Bergdahi got others killed
Anonymous wrote:I really don't see how this is becoming a partisan issue. Pretty sad that the left is defending this move.
It is going to be controversial when you (1) release prisoners of war when the war is still ongoing and (2) when you praise a deserter.
Personally, I'm ok with exchanging the prisoners but can see where there would be legitimate 2nd guessing. But I'm not ok with making this guy out to be a hero and hope he faces charges.
This became a partisan issue when you nut jobs made it one. You and your kind are just disgusting. You have tried and convicted this soldier in the press to score political points and the people doing it did every thing they could to avoid service- think Cheney, Beck, O'Reilly, Rush etc. You say Bergdahi got others killed, while just brushing over all the military member killed and wounded in Iraq, a war that you republican lied us in to. Calling the POWs exchanged terrorist, while republicans release over 500 with the same classification and who fought against after release. Yep let's roll some more interviews of the soldiers who served with Bergdahi saying we should not have got him back b/c he didn't drink beer with us. I am sick of you fucks. You have crossed the line. Fuck you hope you and your kind burn in hell.
I really don't see how this is becoming a partisan issue. Pretty sad that the left is defending this move.
It is going to be controversial when you (1) release prisoners of war when the war is still ongoing and (2) when you praise a deserter.
Personally, I'm ok with exchanging the prisoners but can see where there would be legitimate 2nd guessing. But I'm not ok with making this guy out to be a hero and hope he faces charges.
Anonymous wrote:Leading conservative commentators are starting to also arrive at the conclusion that the President did have authority. http://mediamatters.org/video/2014/06/03/watch-charles-krauthammer-debunk-claims-that-ob/199578
Anonymous wrote:Bergdahl looked quite healthy on the released footage. And why did his captors lament about not being able to say goodbye?
Wasn't his deteriorating health a concern?
Why would he forget how to speak English? And if he did, why did his father also speak to him in English after saying he forgot?
Anonymous wrote:Posting again to say, I am always a sucker for reading conspiracy theories and one of the theories is that Bergdahl was a spy for the US and his cover had been blown. Now at least that would make more sense to me. Here is the conspiracy theory article:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/06/guide-to-bowe-bergdahl-conspiracy-theories.html
Can you point out who in this thread said he was a hero? Because I'm pretty sure no one did.
Anonymous wrote:I really don't see how this is becoming a partisan issue. Pretty sad that the left is defending this move.
It is going to be controversial when you (1) release prisoners of war when the war is still ongoing and (2) when you praise a deserter.
Personally, I'm ok with exchanging the prisoners but can see where there would be legitimate 2nd guessing. But I'm not ok with making this guy out to be a hero and hope he faces charges.