Anonymous wrote:I also attend our IB DCPS-- but the above posting is ridic. It just isn't an option for all DC residents to attend a great IB school regardless of willingness to "make some financial sacrifices". there just isn't enough housing in those limited areas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In summary:
DCPS costs more.
Credibility of saying otherwise: 0
Dead horse: well beaten
I don't really care. My kid attends a wonderful DC public school, and I have no intention of ever using the services of a charter school. I don’t think that someone’s experiment (charter schools) should be funded at the same level as DCPS (especially the most successful schools). You knew what you were signing up for when you enrolled your child in XYZ charter. And if you didn't...shame on you!
Now, this horse is really dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New poster here. Agree but it doesn't matter what you say about Banneker, a lot of white middle and upper income people just won't even give it a look. Their loss.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Too many brown kids...be real. Not my opinion, but i've seen a lot of this on this site.Anonymous wrote:Really makes me wonder why more kids don't attempt Banneker.
So much for the theory that the only way to improve scores is to attract "white/affluent" students and their "likley to be involved" parents.
Just checked Banneker's website. It's by application but the decision to accept is apparently not based upon any identifiable measure. Instead it's based upon a committee's judgment, to wit: "The entire screening and selection process of applicants for the Benjamin Banneker Academic High School is the responsibility of a Selection Committee. Final determination of accepted applicants will be made after a personal interview. Applicants will be notified of approval or denial."
Now that got me thinking...a zero percentage of whites...we know that whites traditionally have performed well enough to be "accepted" if the criteria were performance... and odds are that at least a few white kids want to be pioneers and that would help them be accepted if the criteria were willingness...but perhaps it is the "selection committee" that prevents a crack in the fortress? Is the selection process open and transparent? Can an investigative reporter please find out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, and it obviously doesn't matter what you think either. If it did, DCPS would care.
Yes but the difference is that DCPS could potentially be held legally accountable for not obeying the law in DC. The weight of the law holds more sway than mere opinions.
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, and it obviously doesn't matter what you think either. If it did, DCPS would care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I don't really care. My kid attends a wonderful DC public school, and I have no intention of ever using the services of a charter school. I don’t think that someone’s experiment (charter schools) should be funded at the same level as DCPS (especially the most successful schools). You knew what you were signing up for when you enrolled your child in XYZ charter. And if you didn't...shame on you!
Now, this horse is really dead.
It does not matter what you think since DC law already requires equal funding of charter schools and public schools. Unfortunately, DC does not follow their own law in this case.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In summary:
DCPS costs more.
Credibility of saying otherwise: 0
Dead horse: well beaten
I don't really care. My kid attends a wonderful DC public school, and I have no intention of ever using the services of a charter school. I don’t think that someone’s experiment (charter schools) should be funded at the same level as DCPS (especially the most successful schools). You knew what you were signing up for when you enrolled your child in XYZ charter. And if you didn't...shame on you!
Now, this horse is really dead.
Yes, get to where you're happy, pull up the ladder, and declare the conversation finished. Nice!
Pull up the ladder? Really? The last time I checked, DC public schools were free. I moved IB for the school that I liked the best. No one pays our mortgage for us. You can do the same thing, but you may have to make some financial sacrifices.
Anonymous wrote:
I don't really care. My kid attends a wonderful DC public school, and I have no intention of ever using the services of a charter school. I don’t think that someone’s experiment (charter schools) should be funded at the same level as DCPS (especially the most successful schools). You knew what you were signing up for when you enrolled your child in XYZ charter. And if you didn't...shame on you!
Now, this horse is really dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In summary:
DCPS costs more.
Credibility of saying otherwise: 0
Dead horse: well beaten
I don't really care. My kid attends a wonderful DC public school, and I have no intention of ever using the services of a charter school. I don’t think that someone’s experiment (charter schools) should be funded at the same level as DCPS (especially the most successful schools). You knew what you were signing up for when you enrolled your child in XYZ charter. And if you didn't...shame on you!
Now, this horse is really dead.
Yes, get to where you're happy, pull up the ladder, and declare the conversation finished. Nice!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In summary:
DCPS costs more.
Credibility of saying otherwise: 0
Dead horse: well beaten
I don't really care. My kid attends a wonderful DC public school, and I have no intention of ever using the services of a charter school. I don’t think that someone’s experiment (charter schools) should be funded at the same level as DCPS (especially the most successful schools). You knew what you were signing up for when you enrolled your child in XYZ charter. And if you didn't...shame on you!
Now, this horse is really dead.
You're a really stupid one aren't you? The entire point has been and always will be that there are not enough public schools for everyone to be as lucky as you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In summary:
DCPS costs more.
Credibility of saying otherwise: 0
Dead horse: well beaten
I don't really care. My kid attends a wonderful DC public school, and I have no intention of ever using the services of a charter school. I don’t think that someone’s experiment (charter schools) should be funded at the same level as DCPS (especially the most successful schools). You knew what you were signing up for when you enrolled your child in XYZ charter. And if you didn't...shame on you!
Now, this horse is really dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In summary:
DCPS costs more.
Credibility of saying otherwise: 0
Dead horse: well beaten
I don't really care. My kid attends a wonderful DC public school, and I have no intention of ever using the services of a charter school. I don’t think that someone’s experiment (charter schools) should be funded at the same level as DCPS (especially the most successful schools). You knew what you were signing up for when you enrolled your child in XYZ charter. And if you didn't...shame on you!
Now, this horse is really dead.
Anonymous wrote:In summary:
DCPS costs more.
Credibility of saying otherwise: 0
Dead horse: well beaten