Anonymous wrote:13:50 Are we following the same story?
1. Paula Deen's brother is accused of creating a hostile workplace. Yet the woman who sued filed no complaints with the EEOC. She decides to sue ... for $1.2 million. Further, she's white, so she really doesn't have standing on claims of racism. That aspect of the lawsuit may not stand.
2. It has been widely reported that the plaintiff worked for Paula's brother, not Paula, at his restaurant, not hers, and it has been widely speculated that the plaintiff included Paula and her restaurant in the lawsuit for their deep pockets and also because they're famous, which could add pressure them into settling.
3. I beg to differ. I'd love to hear her explain her motives, and why she didn't leave her job if things were as bad as she claims -- five years is a long time to put up with what she claims was happening -- and/or why she didn't take other measures to try and correct the workplace environment.
4. You missed my point. I am not describing my tastes or preferences. I was making the point that such sensibilities are not exclusive to Paula Deen -- and further they are not illegal. When I went to the Homestead in the early 1990s, to cover a business conference, I was stunned by the plantation sensibilities.
FYI: Not all plantations were owned by slaveowners. So your equal signs are inaccurate.
It is a witch hunt. Paula Deen has little or nothing to do with the running of the restaurant, and has never had more than a 15 minute conversation with the plaintiff, which took place in 2007. And there is no real record of that conversation. Wow, just wow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Paula on the Today Show
http://www.today.com/food/paula-deen-i-would-not-have-fired-me-6C10454147#
More white privilege: "Those kids say it to each other. I don't understand why I can't say it, too." (If you don't know the difference between an in-group employee's use of a term in an ironic way, and an employer's use of the term in a serious way, you are too dumb to live.)
"I don't know what is offensive and what isn't." (This is grade school level stuff. Again, too dumb to live.)
"Evil people are out to get me!" (Nope. You're the one with the problem. You might want to reconsider your BS.)
Anonymous wrote:Why are black standup comics and rap singers allowed to use the word while Paula Deen cannot? The word's not illegal. I cannot believe the Food Network caved. I'm white, from the north, have never used the word myself. But I think this is outrageous, that her contract was not renewed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Paula on the Today Show
http://www.today.com/food/paula-deen-i-would-not-have-fired-me-6C10454147#
More white privilege: "Those kids say it to each other. I don't understand why I can't say it, too." (If you don't know the difference between an in-group employee's use of a term in an ironic way, and an employer's use of the term in a serious way, you are too dumb to live.)
"I don't know what is offensive and what isn't." (This is grade school level stuff. Again, too dumb to live.)
"Evil people are out to get me!" (Nope. You're the one with the problem. You might want to reconsider your BS.)
Anonymous wrote:Paula on the Today Show
http://www.today.com/food/paula-deen-i-would-not-have-fired-me-6C10454147#
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:True I am not the judge. Is the Food Network?
The Food Network is the judge of which celebrities project the brand image they want and which don't. They decided that Paula Dean does not project the brand image they want.
Exactly. I do not get the outrage directed at the Food Network. Paula Deen used racist terms and admitted to it. That's hardly the image that the Food Network - or any decent business - wants to project to the public. Why is that a mystery to so many of you?!
And is Paula Deen entitled to say the N word? Sure. But there are ramifications for using racial slurs (i.e., you may lose friends, business associates, employment, etc). She made her bed, now she's lying in it. Sucks, but them the breaks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's why UVA is a subpar university. It reeks of plantation. I am serious.
I didn't go to UVA and have zero ties to the school. But UVA is certainly NOT a sub par university - it's one of the the best public universities in the nation and rivals many top privates, including Ivies in every major ranking.
Don't know that it reeks of plantation, either, but you're entitled to your opinion on that one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:True I am not the judge. Is the Food Network?
The Food Network is the judge of which celebrities project the brand image they want and which don't. They decided that Paula Dean does not project the brand image they want.
Anonymous wrote:That's why UVA is a subpar university. It reeks of plantation. I am serious.
Anonymous wrote:Shit. Do I have to stop saying plantation shutters?