Anonymous wrote:Terry's case was thrown out on summary judgment today.
Anonymous wrote:Terry's case was thrown out on summary judgment today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone know whether this case has moved along?
Are you the Alexandria Academy stalker? I know people told you to get a new hobby, but this isn't what we meant.
OMG, don't tell me that the Rev. TR has a connection to this??!!
Anonymous wrote:Wait, so the Admissions Director is supposed to be at fault when a "highly gifted" member of a family prominent to the school is admitted?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone know whether this case has moved along?
Are you the Alexandria Academy stalker? I know people told you to get a new hobby, but this isn't what we meant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Actually, the Complaint alleges he called and informedthe Head Adm Officer of his concerns that the academic match was not appropriate--not based on geography. With 2 prior kids matriculating there, and his receipt of tge "parent volunteer" award formerly, and as an alum & donor, you'd think he'd receive some deference. My guess is her former DC worksite has partner-mentors also school connected for a custodial spouse's opinion to be discarded by Admissions. I would also guess his reservations were not passed on to the entire team
Wut.
Anonymous wrote:An Admisdions Director is at fault when a respected alum father, who is not separated & has full custody, tells her he has had two children in the school very successfully, but the school's educational offerings are not in this child's best interests such that he will neither sign the application nor pay for attendance. Any Admin Officer admitting a student under that circumstance is willfully choosing to "split" a 5 yo from her custodial father and dooming future teachers to a failed Parent-teacher relationship. Hard to find worse Admiss Officer judgment