Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two other problems with this claim:
1. ML isn’t the head coach for the BSC 2010s.
2. The team he left behind did markedly worse under a new coach, more than losing a couple good players should cause, esp if these SYC players were as good as their parents thought.
The 5 best players left FVU for BSC. It’s not a “few good players”. More importantly, the player that got the team to the Elite 8 left.
Anyone that knows these players, coaches, and teams knows the details.
ML had one player at FVU that would erase his mistakes and cover his weaknesses. He doesn’t have that at BSC so he actually has to coach a team and he can’t do it that this level.
ML can’t coach at this level because he is having a bad season?
So pretty much every coach in this area can’t coach correct?
Can you name all the coaches in the DMV area that have coached a team to the final 8?
CW has coached in the ecnl pretty much since it started and never made it that far. And he is has had way more BAD seasons than ML will ever have.
Lol - ML talking trash, when he is 0 for the season with the team he is coaching this year. You’ll get that first and only W against PFusion, we believe in you!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two other problems with this claim:
1. ML isn’t the head coach for the BSC 2010s.
2. The team he left behind did markedly worse under a new coach, more than losing a couple good players should cause, esp if these SYC players were as good as their parents thought.
The 5 best players left FVU for BSC. It’s not a “few good players”. More importantly, the player that got the team to the Elite 8 left.
Anyone that knows these players, coaches, and teams knows the details.
ML had one player at FVU that would erase his mistakes and cover his weaknesses. He doesn’t have that at BSC so he actually has to coach a team and he can’t do it that this level.
ML can’t coach at this level because he is having a bad season?
So pretty much every coach in this area can’t coach correct?
Can you name all the coaches in the DMV area that have coached a team to the final 8?
CW has coached in the ecnl pretty much since it started and never made it that far. And he is has had way more BAD seasons than ML will ever have.
Lol - ML talking trash, when he is 0 for the season with the team he is coaching this year. You’ll get that first and only W against PFusion, we believe in you!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two other problems with this claim:
1. ML isn’t the head coach for the BSC 2010s.
2. The team he left behind did markedly worse under a new coach, more than losing a couple good players should cause, esp if these SYC players were as good as their parents thought.
The 5 best players left FVU for BSC. It’s not a “few good players”. More importantly, the player that got the team to the Elite 8 left.
Anyone that knows these players, coaches, and teams knows the details.
ML had one player at FVU that would erase his mistakes and cover his weaknesses. He doesn’t have that at BSC so he actually has to coach a team and he can’t do it that this level.
ML can’t coach at this level because he is having a bad season?
So pretty much every coach in this area can’t coach correct?
Can you name all the coaches in the DMV area that have coached a team to the final 8?
CW has coached in the ecnl pretty much since it started and never made it that far. And he is has had way more BAD seasons than ML will ever have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two other problems with this claim:
1. ML isn’t the head coach for the BSC 2010s.
2. The team he left behind did markedly worse under a new coach, more than losing a couple good players should cause, esp if these SYC players were as good as their parents thought.
The 5 best players left FVU for BSC. It’s not a “few good players”. More importantly, the player that got the team to the Elite 8 left.
Anyone that knows these players, coaches, and teams knows the details.
ML had one player at FVU that would erase his mistakes and cover his weaknesses. He doesn’t have that at BSC so he actually has to coach a team and he can’t do it that this level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the girls. No, it's just some of the girls. Actually, it's the lack of fields. Not that, maybe it's the boys. Sorry, no it's the 2014's. Maybe it's the 2015's that are a year from formation.
Give it a rest.
I mean people are trying to figure how a club that has so many built in advantages could be so bad.
That's fair but the girls' side isn't bad even with all of the recent changes. The boys' side isn't good but one team is becoming competitive and the hope is that they can build with the incoming younger ages.
Union turned over the entire 2009 roster and still had a terrible season.
And a bunch of those girls are turning around and leaving FVU after just one year, because they see how poor of an organization it really is.
Or just maybe the girls aren’t that good?
Which I guess that means the original FVU girls they replaced were not that good either
Yes this is sound logic, becasue those girls went to BSC and are at the bottom of the table in the NA with the legendary ML in charge
This BSC experience has exposed ML.
Can you please explain this?
Is ML not a good coach anymore because he had a bad season?
Walking into a landmine here. The 2010 parents are mostly SYC parents. They think their kids walk on water, like all SYC parents. They are going to tell you that ML lucked into their kids and succeeded despite his coaching. None of their failures are based on teams that favored athleticism over skills throughout the years. They have been WAITING to blame the failure of their kids on him for YEARS. Just like after every failed national run. Top team, go to Nationals, not their kids fault, always coach or other reasons. The bottom line is it was always going to go the way SYC clubs do, start strong, recruit based on athleticism over skill, blame the coach for late failures because of the early recruiting mistakes. That team was doomed whether they stayed at SYC or when MYS decided to bring the whole SYC team over to Union despite MYS saying they valued development over athleticism. Clearly a lie. CW sold his sole that year and went the ARL model, and the group is now performing like all teams that follow that model. This team was, and always will be, CW selling his soul.
Are there any coaches left out there who haven’t sold their soul and genuinely value skill over size anymore? Especially for females?
The problem is male coaches do not understand female athleticism, strength or development and default to size at too young an age. Now we have a bunch of dudes deciding which girls are athletic and failing badly long term.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two other problems with this claim:
1. ML isn’t the head coach for the BSC 2010s.
2. The team he left behind did markedly worse under a new coach, more than losing a couple good players should cause, esp if these SYC players were as good as their parents thought.
The 5 best players left FVU for BSC. It’s not a “few good players”. More importantly, the player that got the team to the Elite 8 left.
Anyone that knows these players, coaches, and teams knows the details.
ML had one player at FVU that would erase his mistakes and cover his weaknesses. He doesn’t have that at BSC so he actually has to coach a team and he can’t do it that this level.
Anonymous wrote:Two other problems with this claim:
1. ML isn’t the head coach for the BSC 2010s.
2. The team he left behind did markedly worse under a new coach, more than losing a couple good players should cause, esp if these SYC players were as good as their parents thought.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the girls. No, it's just some of the girls. Actually, it's the lack of fields. Not that, maybe it's the boys. Sorry, no it's the 2014's. Maybe it's the 2015's that are a year from formation.
Give it a rest.
I mean people are trying to figure how a club that has so many built in advantages could be so bad.
That's fair but the girls' side isn't bad even with all of the recent changes. The boys' side isn't good but one team is becoming competitive and the hope is that they can build with the incoming younger ages.
Union turned over the entire 2009 roster and still had a terrible season.
And a bunch of those girls are turning around and leaving FVU after just one year, because they see how poor of an organization it really is.
Or just maybe the girls aren’t that good?
Which I guess that means the original FVU girls they replaced were not that good either
Yes this is sound logic, becasue those girls went to BSC and are at the bottom of the table in the NA with the legendary ML in charge
This BSC experience has exposed ML.
Can you please explain this?
Is ML not a good coach anymore because he had a bad season?
Walking into a landmine here. The 2010 parents are mostly SYC parents. They think their kids walk on water, like all SYC parents. They are going to tell you that ML lucked into their kids and succeeded despite his coaching. None of their failures are based on teams that favored athleticism over skills throughout the years. They have been WAITING to blame the failure of their kids on him for YEARS. Just like after every failed national run. Top team, go to Nationals, not their kids fault, always coach or other reasons. The bottom line is it was always going to go the way SYC clubs do, start strong, recruit based on athleticism over skill, blame the coach for late failures because of the early recruiting mistakes. That team was doomed whether they stayed at SYC or when MYS decided to bring the whole SYC team over to Union despite MYS saying they valued development over athleticism. Clearly a lie. CW sold his sole that year and went the ARL model, and the group is now performing like all teams that follow that model. This team was, and always will be, CW selling his soul.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it true that FVU is having additional tryouts for 2 ages groups because they don’t have enough players?
There are so many kids switching clubs/ teams this year…. They know a lot of kids have not decided/ been caught off guard. Quite a few clubs are holding another tryout to catch a few more kids.
Which other clubs are holding additional tryouts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it true that FVU is having additional tryouts for 2 ages groups because they don’t have enough players?
There are so many kids switching clubs/ teams this year…. They know a lot of kids have not decided/ been caught off guard. Quite a few clubs are holding another tryout to catch a few more kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the girls. No, it's just some of the girls. Actually, it's the lack of fields. Not that, maybe it's the boys. Sorry, no it's the 2014's. Maybe it's the 2015's that are a year from formation.
Give it a rest.
I mean people are trying to figure how a club that has so many built in advantages could be so bad.
That's fair but the girls' side isn't bad even with all of the recent changes. The boys' side isn't good but one team is becoming competitive and the hope is that they can build with the incoming younger ages.
Union turned over the entire 2009 roster and still had a terrible season.
And a bunch of those girls are turning around and leaving FVU after just one year, because they see how poor of an organization it really is.
Or just maybe the girls aren’t that good?
Which I guess that means the original FVU girls they replaced were not that good either
Yes this is sound logic, becasue those girls went to BSC and are at the bottom of the table in the NA with the legendary ML in charge
This BSC experience has exposed ML.
Can you please explain this?
Is ML not a good coach anymore because he had a bad season?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's the girls. No, it's just some of the girls. Actually, it's the lack of fields. Not that, maybe it's the boys. Sorry, no it's the 2014's. Maybe it's the 2015's that are a year from formation.
Give it a rest.
I mean people are trying to figure how a club that has so many built in advantages could be so bad.
That's fair but the girls' side isn't bad even with all of the recent changes. The boys' side isn't good but one team is becoming competitive and the hope is that they can build with the incoming younger ages.
Union turned over the entire 2009 roster and still had a terrible season.
And a bunch of those girls are turning around and leaving FVU after just one year, because they see how poor of an organization it really is.
Or just maybe the girls aren’t that good?
Which I guess that means the original FVU girls they replaced were not that good either
Yes this is sound logic, becasue those girls went to BSC and are at the bottom of the table in the NA with the legendary ML in charge
This BSC experience has exposed ML.