Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

Strawman. Literally no one said she's a "helpless victim".

The rabid attacks on women (by other women) is repulsive.

Why do you feel the need to go after these strangers and judge/jury them?

She massively effed up. She owned it, why can't you?

Read her resignation letter again. She doesn't take any responsibility (aka own it) at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

GMAFB.

It's sexist to always focus on the woman, not the man, in these situations.

This is different situation. She is a reporter apparently hooking up with a source/subject/in the know on the one thing she reports. She is married and has been accused of this before.

And he’s the face of a 5 billion dollar team in a 300 billion dollar pro league. He has no integrity. He is honestly a disgrace.

I agree with you. It's always the woman that takes all the ramifications professionally and personally, while the men just get to trot on with life as if nothing happened.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

GMAFB.

It's sexist to always focus on the woman, not the man, in these situations.

This is different situation. She is a reporter apparently hooking up with a source/subject/in the know on the one thing she reports. She is married and has been accused of this before.

And he’s the face of a 5 billion dollar team in a 300 billion dollar pro league. He has no integrity. He is honestly a disgrace.

I agree with you. It's always the woman that takes all the ramifications professionally and personally, while the men just get to trot on with life as if nothing happened.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

Strawman. Literally no one said she's a "helpless victim".

The rabid attacks on women (by other women) is repulsive.

Why do you feel the need to go after these strangers and judge/jury them?

She massively effed up. She owned it, why can't you?

I'm not talking about her behavior.

I'm talking about the repulsive vultures who get off on trashing women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

GMAFB.

It's sexist to always focus on the woman, not the man, in these situations.

This is different situation. She is a reporter apparently hooking up with a source/subject/in the know on the one thing she reports. She is married and has been accused of this before.

And he’s the face of a 5 billion dollar team in a 300 billion dollar pro league. He has no integrity. He is honestly a disgrace.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

Strawman. Literally no one said she's a "helpless victim".

The rabid attacks on women (by other women) is repulsive.

Why do you feel the need to go after these strangers and judge/jury them?

She massively effed up. She owned it, why can't you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

GMAFB.

It's sexist to always focus on the woman, not the man, in these situations.

This is different situation. She is a reporter apparently hooking up with a source/subject/in the know on the one thing she reports. She is married and has been accused of this before.

Anonymous wrote:She broke a main rule of her career. I would not want her in my employ.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

GMAFB.

It's sexist to always focus on the woman, not the man, in these situations.

This is different situation. She is a reporter apparently hooking up with a source/subject/in the know on the one thing she reports. She is married and has been accused of this before.

Anonymous wrote:She broke a main rule of her career. I would not want her in my employ.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

GMAFB.

It's sexist to always focus on the woman, not the man, in these situations.