Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

If you've been polarized by anonymous posts on an internet forum, congratulations, you are admitting your own profound irrationality.

If you don't remember that accurately referring to people as deplorable had consequences then congratulations you have selective amnesia. Contempt has consequences. Trump told them they were his best supporters and they still are.

You are proving PP’s point about profound irrationality.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Venn diagram of people who strutted around and bleated "elections have consequences" after Trump won and the people who are whining about Democratic overreach in redistricting is a perfect circle. GMAFB.

That was Obama's line!

That’s why MAGA loves it so much.

That makes absolutely no sense. But remember, without Obama's divisiveness (that line is the perfect example), Trump never gets elected and there is no MAGA. Thanks, Obama!

No, it makes perfect sense. A decade after leaving office and you're still hysterical about having had a black president. I wonder what you have to say about Trump's divisiveness! Wait, never mind, I already know that you love it because "he's telling it like it is," or something.

Funny how the PP never responded to this.

There's nothing to respond to. Read your own words. You actually said "Wait, never mind". Remember you somehow already know what I think. You're convinced I'm a racist, MAGA, Trump supporter, so what's the point?

Again, remember that saying about "assume". And you you really should work on your reading comprehension, along with your Shakespeare quotes.

You are making some ASSumptions and confusing posters. I didn’t write any of those comments.

If you thought Obama was “divisive”, please share your thoughts on Trump.

My apologies. I assumed and the old saying proved true.

Trump is obviously very divisive as well. I won't even put that in quotations.

You consider Obama “very divisive” when compared to Trump? GMAFB.

That's not what I said, but whatever. So no thanks, I won't give you a f'ing break

“ Trump is obviously very divisive as well “

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

You base your vote on anonymous comments on a mommy website?

No I posted my vote and reasons on a mommy website. Mommy scolded. Actually, mommy pol-bots.

“ you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates “

^^ While SOME Dems will surely vote no...

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

That's not happening. Dems have been flipping seats since 2028. I know a lot of Dems in DC who didn't vote for ranked choice voting, which I thought was misguided. While Dems will surely vote no, I do think many Dems aren't understanding the changing landscape. Politics will never be the same again. To deny that reality is to stay stuck where we are today, which is not in a good place. But, you'd better believe that a referendum on the Dems is coming this year. But, like any triage, you have to start with the most severe problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

If you've been polarized by anonymous posts on an internet forum, congratulations, you are admitting your own profound irrationality.

If you don't remember that accurately referring to people as deplorable had consequences then congratulations you have selective amnesia. Contempt has consequences. Trump told them they were his best supporters and they still are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

If you've been polarized by anonymous posts on an internet forum, congratulations, you are admitting your own profound irrationality.

Admit yours in thinking that when the YES wins on this it's going to do what is claimed. And that it will be viewed as good after 2032.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

You base your vote on anonymous comments on a mommy website?

No I posted my vote and reasons on a mommy website. Mommy scolded. Actually, mommy pol-bots.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Venn diagram of people who strutted around and bleated "elections have consequences" after Trump won and the people who are whining about Democratic overreach in redistricting is a perfect circle. GMAFB.

That was Obama's line!

That’s why MAGA loves it so much.

That makes absolutely no sense. But remember, without Obama's divisiveness (that line is the perfect example), Trump never gets elected and there is no MAGA. Thanks, Obama!

No, it makes perfect sense. A decade after leaving office and you're still hysterical about having had a black president. I wonder what you have to say about Trump's divisiveness! Wait, never mind, I already know that you love it because "he's telling it like it is," or something.

Funny how the PP never responded to this.

There's nothing to respond to. Read your own words. You actually said "Wait, never mind". Remember you somehow already know what I think. You're convinced I'm a racist, MAGA, Trump supporter, so what's the point?

Again, remember that saying about "assume". And you you really should work on your reading comprehension, along with your Shakespeare quotes.

You are making some ASSumptions and confusing posters. I didn’t write any of those comments.

If you thought Obama was “divisive”, please share your thoughts on Trump.

My apologies. I assumed and the old saying proved true.

Trump is obviously very divisive as well. I won't even put that in quotations.

You consider Obama “very divisive” when compared to Trump? GMAFB.

That's not what I said, but whatever. So no thanks, I won't give you a f'ing break

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

If you've been polarized by anonymous posts on an internet forum, congratulations, you are admitting your own profound irrationality.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every one of you (presumably Democrats?) that rabidly call anyone voting no a MAGA or Trumper or conscienceless...you are turning Independents that vote on issues against Dem candidates in local and state elections. I have never voted for a Republican president btw but think both parties are deeply flawed and started thinking that in 1970.

You base your vote on anonymous comments on a mommy website?

Someone thinks people take this site seriously.

Anonymous wrote:22 point swing to the GOP in the special election, Rice over Smith.

Can’t have that, can we Dems…

Republican district votes for Republican. Shocker.

If anything, it shows how Republicans no longer show up for Trump.

22 point swing to the GOP in the special election, Rice over Smith.

Can’t have that, can we Dems…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NO, no way, no how. It's wrong. Don't give a f on what side of the street you're on, its wrong.

+1 million wrong is wrong.

I agree! Vote no!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Venn diagram of people who strutted around and bleated "elections have consequences" after Trump won and the people who are whining about Democratic overreach in redistricting is a perfect circle. GMAFB.

That was Obama's line!

That’s why MAGA loves it so much.

That makes absolutely no sense. But remember, without Obama's divisiveness (that line is the perfect example), Trump never gets elected and there is no MAGA. Thanks, Obama!

No, it makes perfect sense. A decade after leaving office and you're still hysterical about having had a black president. I wonder what you have to say about Trump's divisiveness! Wait, never mind, I already know that you love it because "he's telling it like it is," or something.

Funny how the PP never responded to this.

There's nothing to respond to. Read your own words. You actually said "Wait, never mind". Remember you somehow already know what I think. You're convinced I'm a racist, MAGA, Trump supporter, so what's the point?

Again, remember that saying about "assume". And you you really should work on your reading comprehension, along with your Shakespeare quotes.

You are making some ASSumptions and confusing posters. I didn’t write any of those comments.

If you thought Obama was “divisive”, please share your thoughts on Trump.

My apologies. I assumed and the old saying proved true.

Trump is obviously very divisive as well. I won't even put that in quotations.

You consider Obama “very divisive” when compared to Trump? GMAFB.