If the Democrats want to win an election, they need to realize optics matter and they are considered the party of Hollywood freaks and Wall Street/Silicon Valley geeks.

Gone are the champions for the working class and fighters for families. We have a party now that talks about abortion like it’s Christmas. We have gone off the deep end with relating to the general public.

NAFTA killed the Midwest and South. When’s the last time Clinton was in Little Rock? The Clinton’s carpetbagged their way to Westchester and millionaire status and left the flyover states for dead. When’s the last time the Obama’s were in Chicago?

Long gone are the days where Jimmy Carter went back to the peanut farm and his home state

People forget it was pennsylvania and the rust belt that flipped by a hair for Trump. These people aren’t stupid. They know who was responsible for shipping their jobs to China

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ro Khanna – Economic justice + tech accountability; Sanders-style critique with policy fluency.
Cory Booker – Obama-style moral optimism with Clinton-era coalition instincts.
Josh Shapiro – Classic Clintonian pragmatism: swing-state appeal, bipartisan tone, electoral discipline.
Gavin Newsom – Clinton-like charisma and political agility; strong media fluency.
Rahm Emanuel – Hard-edged Clintonian operator: transactional, strategic, results-focused.
Wes Moore – Obama-adjacent narrative leadership: aspirational, disciplined, unity-focused.
Michael Bennet – Technocratic, low-drama, Obama-era governing ethos.
Terry McAuliffe – Pure Clinton DNA: coalition politics, donor fluency, electoral pragmatism.
Pete Buttigieg – The strongest Obama analogue: cerebral, calm, rhetorically precise, norms-oriented.

VP Picks
Elizabeth Warren – Policy-heavy progressive populism; structural critique of capitalism with academic rigor.
Sherrod Brown – Labor-first, anti-corporate economic populism with Midwest credibility.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez – Generational Sanders figure: moral clarity, populist framing, movement energy.
Amy Klobuchar – Clinton-style competence, incrementalism, and Midwestern credibility.

Alright savvy people of DCUM, how did ChatGPT do on this one? I'm not sure it got it wrong.

Clinton and Obama need to be scrubbed out of the party.

Democrats need to look forward

Yes! And Reagan and GHWB need to be scrubbed from the GOP. We need more Trumps and Biden! More Trumps and Biden! More Trumps and Bidens and more cowbell, please!

Clinton and nafta and Obama
And the TPP is the reason Trump won in the first place

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ro Khanna – Economic justice + tech accountability; Sanders-style critique with policy fluency.
Cory Booker – Obama-style moral optimism with Clinton-era coalition instincts.
Josh Shapiro – Classic Clintonian pragmatism: swing-state appeal, bipartisan tone, electoral discipline.
Gavin Newsom – Clinton-like charisma and political agility; strong media fluency.
Rahm Emanuel – Hard-edged Clintonian operator: transactional, strategic, results-focused.
Wes Moore – Obama-adjacent narrative leadership: aspirational, disciplined, unity-focused.
Michael Bennet – Technocratic, low-drama, Obama-era governing ethos.
Terry McAuliffe – Pure Clinton DNA: coalition politics, donor fluency, electoral pragmatism.
Pete Buttigieg – The strongest Obama analogue: cerebral, calm, rhetorically precise, norms-oriented.

VP Picks
Elizabeth Warren – Policy-heavy progressive populism; structural critique of capitalism with academic rigor.
Sherrod Brown – Labor-first, anti-corporate economic populism with Midwest credibility.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez – Generational Sanders figure: moral clarity, populist framing, movement energy.
Amy Klobuchar – Clinton-style competence, incrementalism, and Midwestern credibility.

Alright savvy people of DCUM, how did ChatGPT do on this one? I'm not sure it got it wrong.

Clinton and Obama need to be scrubbed out of the party.

Democrats need to look forward

Yes! And Reagan and GHWB need to be scrubbed from the GOP. We need more Trumps and Biden! More Trumps and Biden! More Trumps and Bidens and more cowbell, please!

Anonymous wrote:Ro Khanna – Economic justice + tech accountability; Sanders-style critique with policy fluency.
Cory Booker – Obama-style moral optimism with Clinton-era coalition instincts.
Josh Shapiro – Classic Clintonian pragmatism: swing-state appeal, bipartisan tone, electoral discipline.
Gavin Newsom – Clinton-like charisma and political agility; strong media fluency.
Rahm Emanuel – Hard-edged Clintonian operator: transactional, strategic, results-focused.
Wes Moore – Obama-adjacent narrative leadership: aspirational, disciplined, unity-focused.
Michael Bennet – Technocratic, low-drama, Obama-era governing ethos.
Terry McAuliffe – Pure Clinton DNA: coalition politics, donor fluency, electoral pragmatism.
Pete Buttigieg – The strongest Obama analogue: cerebral, calm, rhetorically precise, norms-oriented.

VP Picks
Elizabeth Warren – Policy-heavy progressive populism; structural critique of capitalism with academic rigor.
Sherrod Brown – Labor-first, anti-corporate economic populism with Midwest credibility.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez – Generational Sanders figure: moral clarity, populist framing, movement energy.
Amy Klobuchar – Clinton-style competence, incrementalism, and Midwestern credibility.

Alright savvy people of DCUM, how did ChatGPT do on this one? I'm not sure it got it wrong.

Clinton and Obama need to be scrubbed out of the party.

Democrats need to look forward

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We cannot nominate an Indian or a Jew. They will never win

You're a racist bigot turd. I can smell your stench through the internet.

DP.
You have a very high opinion of americans.
Are you under the impression america isn't filled with racist bigoted turds that would decline to vote for an indian or a Jew?

Clearly the answer is a transexual black lesbian who once ran for dog catcher.

I was responding to the idiot PP who said Indians and Jews couldn't be president. Crawl back under your MAGA rock.

What are the chances that the people on the ChatGPT lists will want to run?

ChatGPT poster again. Since so many posters pushed back on Reagan, I just ran another search for the GOP, this time asking for candidates who compare to Eisenhower. Thoughts? How accurate is the output?

Prompt: Generate a list of ten GOP politicians who would govern like Dwight Eisenhower. Must be untainted by Trump. Must be under the age of 65. Not Ben Sasse.

Here’s a carefully filtered, Eisenhower-style GOP list—focused on pragmatic governance, institutional respect, managerial competence, and low theatricality, rather than ideological performance. I’m flagging why each plausibly maps to Dwight D. Eisenhower’s governing style, and where any edge-case caveats exist.

Constraints applied:
• Republican
• Under 65 (as of 2025)
• Alive, active, capable
• Not Ben Sasse
• Not personally tainted by Trump (i.e., no election-denial, no MAGA persona, no subservience)
• Governing temperament > cable-news charisma

1. Chris Sununu (b. 1974)

Coalition builder, fiscally disciplined, calm executive authority.

2. Spencer Cox (b. 1975)

Civic-trust conservative; explicitly anti-authoritarian; low ego.

3. Brian Kemp (b. 1963)

Chose constitutional duty over Trump pressure; order > theatrics.

4. Will Hurd (b. 1977)

CIA background; internationalist; anti-cult-of-personality Republican.

5. Mike Gallagher (b. 1984)

Serious China / defense focus; policy-driven, not culture-war driven.

6. Jeff Flake (b. 1962)

Integrity-first conservative; resigned rather than normalize Trumpism.
(Out of office, but archetypal Eisenhower Republican.)

7. Glenn Youngkin (b. 1966)

Managerial executive; businesslike governance; avoided MAGA branding.
(Occasional base signaling, but not Trump-aligned.)

8. Doug Ducey (b. 1964)

Infrastructure, budgets, rule-of-law conservatism; broke with Trump when tested.

9. Adam Kinzinger (b. 1978)

Military officer; NATO-minded; sacrificed career for constitutional norms.

10. John Katko (b. 1962)

Former federal prosecutor; law-and-order institutionalist

Voted to impeach Trump; rejected election denial

Pragmatic, security-focused, low-drama
Eisenhower parallel: Quiet constitutional stewardship over populism
(Out of office, but extremely “Ike-coded”)

Bottom Line

If Eisenhower were alive today, he’d recognize Sununu, Cox, Kemp, Hurd, and Gallagher most immediately as his governing descendants: calm, alliance-oriented, institution-respecting, and uninterested in spectacle.

Anonymous wrote:ChatGPT poster: Your GOP prompt was about Reagan. That makes me think your first one was about Obama? Is that right?

Anyway, I have two follow-up questions: first, would you be willing to share your exact prompt for the first one? The output was so impressive, I thought. Related, did you make the prompt into your own personal, "trained" GPT? Or into the general ChatGPT?

Second, would you be willing to try another round or two on Republicans? The Reagan one somehow doesn't impress me nearly as much as the previous one, maybe because the previous (Democratic) list had a lot of potentially viable 2028 Democratic Primary candidates, while the Reagan list seems focused on governors who aren't likely to be strong GOP primary contenders.

I'm more curious to know, among potential GOP 2028 presidential primary candidates, how would ChatGPT describe them and how would it position them relative to one another the way the first Democratic list did.

I'm curious about Glenn Youngkin, Marco Rubio, J.D. Vance, Donald Trump, Jr., Tucker Carlson, Ron DeSantis, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, etc.

Thank you for anything you're willing to share!

Reagan was the source of much of the downfall of American, the last thing we need is another one.
Of A

Anonymous wrote:ChatGPT poster: Your GOP prompt was about Reagan. That makes me think your first one was about Obama? Is that right?

Anyway, I have two follow-up questions: first, would you be willing to share your exact prompt for the first one? The output was so impressive, I thought. Related, did you make the prompt into your own personal, "trained" GPT? Or into the general ChatGPT?

Second, would you be willing to try another round or two on Republicans? The Reagan one somehow doesn't impress me nearly as much as the previous one, maybe because the previous (Democratic) list had a lot of potentially viable 2028 Democratic Primary candidates, while the Reagan list seems focused on governors who aren't likely to be strong GOP primary contenders.

I'm more curious to know, among potential GOP 2028 presidential primary candidates, how would ChatGPT describe them and how would it position them relative to one another the way the first Democratic list did.

I'm curious about Glenn Youngkin, Marco Rubio, J.D. Vance, Donald Trump, Jr., Tucker Carlson, Ron DeSantis, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, etc.

Thank you for anything you're willing to share!

Chat GPT poster here.

I prompted Chat GPT based on this quote from the poster at 09:24 who wrote: "Second of all, Dems do not need to reinvent the wheel to get back on track. They can simply nominate a normal Obama/Clinton type and the world will breath a sigh of relief. Nominate another Biden and we're screwed again." The credit for the brilliance of the list goes to PP at 09:24 and my impulse to feed the suggestion into ChatGPT.

What I typed into ChatGPT is hysterical in its simplicity and poorly written. The prompt was:

"name ten public figures who are the most similar to barack obama or bill clinton"

It generated a few people who are not U.S. citizens, so I entered the prompt

"u.s. citizens" and then

"exclude obama/clinton"

and then

"identify 10 public figures similar to al gore and bernie sanders"

I fed the prompt into the General ChatGPT, not a trained ChatGPT.

I'll play around with ChatGPT prompts for GOP primary contenders and post a follow-up soon.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We cannot nominate an Indian or a Jew. They will never win

You're a racist bigot turd. I can smell your stench through the internet.

DP.
You have a very high opinion of americans.
Are you under the impression america isn't filled with racist bigoted turds that would decline to vote for an indian or a Jew?

Clearly the answer is a transexual black lesbian who once ran for dog catcher.

Anonymous wrote:We cannot nominate an Indian or a Jew. They will never win

You're a racist bigot turd. I can smell your stench through the internet.

We cannot nominate an Indian or a Jew. They will never win

ChatGPT poster: Your GOP prompt was about Reagan. That makes me think your first one was about Obama? Is that right?

Anyway, I have two follow-up questions: first, would you be willing to share your exact prompt for the first one? The output was so impressive, I thought. Related, did you make the prompt into your own personal, "trained" GPT? Or into the general ChatGPT?

Second, would you be willing to try another round or two on Republicans? The Reagan one somehow doesn't impress me nearly as much as the previous one, maybe because the previous (Democratic) list had a lot of potentially viable 2028 Democratic Primary candidates, while the Reagan list seems focused on governors who aren't likely to be strong GOP primary contenders.

I'm more curious to know, among potential GOP 2028 presidential primary candidates, how would ChatGPT describe them and how would it position them relative to one another the way the first Democratic list did.

I'm curious about Glenn Youngkin, Marco Rubio, J.D. Vance, Donald Trump, Jr., Tucker Carlson, Ron DeSantis, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, etc.

Thank you for anything you're willing to share!