So you're one of those SEC employee that's not a member of the union, don't pay dues but enjoy the union acquired benefits I see. Now complaining about not being privy to union communications. What a farce.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

PP you think they are lying about the arbitration decision? How odd.

What’s “odd” is that it’s been kept a secret. Like a bunch of 13 yo girls talking about who they have a crush on. So unprofessional and shady and weird.

OHR literally sent email to all staff with the arbitration decision and noting the SEC had the option to appeal. it's not a secret. you sound like a disgruntled DRiP; so sorry no one cares about you anymore. guess the money has run out and you don't have a new job yet?

False. They did not send the written opinion. The details matter.

Surprised it hasn’t been “leaked” to Reuters yet. (Though it wouldn’t really be a leak bc it’s not a damn secret to begin with). Even the Epstein files are being disclosed. But not the stupid arbitration opinion?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

PP you think they are lying about the arbitration decision? How odd.

What’s “odd” is that it’s been kept a secret. Like a bunch of 13 yo girls talking about who they have a crush on. So unprofessional and shady and weird.

OHR literally sent email to all staff with the arbitration decision and noting the SEC had the option to appeal. it's not a secret. you sound like a disgruntled DRiP; so sorry no one cares about you anymore. guess the money has run out and you don't have a new job yet?

If we don’t get a follow-up from the Union this week, I will start to wonder what is going on with them. I’d think one of two things. One management wants to play ball and renegotiate the contract with some regular telework. Or two, the union has completely given up and we should all stop paying dues.

The more likely scenario is what the Union hinted at in the fall and it will start having staff send emails or letters detailing how the lose of telework has impacted them. Atkins won’t GAF but at least he will know what he’s done to people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

PP you think they are lying about the arbitration decision? How odd.

What’s “odd” is that it’s been kept a secret. Like a bunch of 13 yo girls talking about who they have a crush on. So unprofessional and shady and weird.

Not that this poster warrants response, but union members were notified of the decision and were provided with a copy of the ruling.

Ooh, yeah, he’s cute! Giggle giggle. I won’t tell anyone.

What a bunch of self important dorks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

PP you think they are lying about the arbitration decision? How odd.

What’s “odd” is that it’s been kept a secret. Like a bunch of 13 yo girls talking about who they have a crush on. So unprofessional and shady and weird.

Not that this poster warrants response, but union members were notified of the decision and were provided with a copy of the ruling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

PP you think they are lying about the arbitration decision? How odd.

What’s “odd” is that it’s been kept a secret. Like a bunch of 13 yo girls talking about who they have a crush on. So unprofessional and shady and weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

The decision was sent to us and it was a solid win. The SEC's arguments were pretty weak.

Sent to whom? By whom? Did they tell you to keep it secret? Why? So weird.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

The decision was sent to us and it was a solid win. The SEC's arguments were pretty weak.

What was the decision?

I heard that a few democrats were hoping to extend the shutdown for 30 days just so the sec would miss the appeal deadline.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

PP you think they are lying about the arbitration decision? How odd.

Then post the decision! Or is it top secret, like the RIF plans? Maybe I’ll just FOIA it, since I’m sure it’s on GG’s work email.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

PP you think they are lying about the arbitration decision? How odd.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

The decision was sent to us and it was a solid win. The SEC's arguments were pretty weak.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why no press on supposed nteu arbitration “win”? And zero press releases from nteu? Odd.

Oh, shut up. And crawl back in your hole.

Ok, GG. Too bad you can’t just answer the question.

lol, too bad you are such a troll.

So no answer, GG?

Can you seriously not figure this out on your own? It’s pretty simple.

Uh, no it’s not simple, GG. If a party wins a big arbitration, that party usually mentions it somewhere. Pretty standard. Even if it’s going to be appealed.

So you think we are making this up or something?

Yes. Or exaggerating.

It will definitely be appealed. Management doesn’t have a choice.