Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

Hesgeth thinks the fog of war is some smoke from an explosion. He’s a weekend news host moron.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain why Admiral Bradley would have allowed this to happen? Assuming Hegseth is wholly unfamiliar with the maritime rules of "war," certainly the Admiral with all of his years of service would have known that this was at the least reckless and very likely a war crime. Is he compromised, too? Is Admiral Bradley MAGA and willing to go down in shame for perpetuity in order to protect Hegseth and the Trump admin?

Maybe ask Obama.

“We used double-taps all the time,” said David Shedd, former deputy director and acting director of the Defense Intelligence Agency in the Obama administration. “You would get the initial signature off of a target that’s been hit,” he told me in a podcast interview, “and if you saw that they ‘squirted’ and were injured … you hit them again.” In fact, he said, “there was often a second predator ready to go … that was fully expected to be used if you didn’t have a 100 percent coming out of the first hit — and maybe a third hit,” adding that “it was done routinely” and there “was bipartisan support on the Hill for doing it.”

Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

Anonymous wrote:Hard to understand why this thread is still around when it has been totally debunked.
Hegseth did no such thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain why Admiral Bradley would have allowed this to happen? Assuming Hegseth is wholly unfamiliar with the maritime rules of "war," certainly the Admiral with all of his years of service would have known that this was at the least reckless and very likely a war crime. Is he compromised, too? Is Admiral Bradley MAGA and willing to go down in shame for perpetuity in order to protect Hegseth and the Trump admin?

Maybe ask Obama.

“We used double-taps all the time,” said David Shedd, former deputy director and acting director of the Defense Intelligence Agency in the Obama administration. “You would get the initial signature off of a target that’s been hit,” he told me in a podcast interview, “and if you saw that they ‘squirted’ and were injured … you hit them again.” In fact, he said, “there was often a second predator ready to go … that was fully expected to be used if you didn’t have a 100 percent coming out of the first hit — and maybe a third hit,” adding that “it was done routinely” and there “was bipartisan support on the Hill for doing it.”

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Anonymous wrote:Can someone please explain why Admiral Bradley would have allowed this to happen? Assuming Hegseth is wholly unfamiliar with the maritime rules of "war," certainly the Admiral with all of his years of service would have known that this was at the least reckless and very likely a war crime. Is he compromised, too? Is Admiral Bradley MAGA and willing to go down in shame for perpetuity in order to protect Hegseth and the Trump admin?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Admit it. You don't care one lick about the narcoterrorists killed in these strikes.
These people are no better than ISIS. Even Dems admit the boats are carrying drugs. And lots of them.

Go back and do a little research about all the innocent people Obama droned and there wasn't a peep from any Democrat.
And, then there was the drone strike in Afghanistan during the withdrawal that killed 10 innocents. Not a whimper from any Democrat.
And, nobody was held responsible for what the Biden administration termed "a righteous strike." 10 INNOCENT people dead.
Frankly, the world is better off without these narcoterrorists walking it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Admit it. You don't care one lick about the narcoterrorists killed in these strikes.
These people are no better than ISIS. Even Dems admit the boats are carrying drugs. And lots of them.

Go back and do a little research about all the innocent people Obama droned and there wasn't a peep from any Democrat.
And, then there was the drone strike in Afghanistan during the withdrawal that killed 10 innocents. Not a whimper from any Democrat.
And, nobody was held responsible for what the Biden administration termed "a righteous strike." 10 INNOCENT people dead.
Frankly, the world is better off without these narcoterrorists walking it.

Anonymous wrote:Debunked? Honestly, how do you weirdos defending the insanity of this regime we’re living through not suffer DAILY from the kind of existential crisis that causes one to question their own sanity.

You’re for blowing up tiny boats, many hundreds of miles from U.S. territory, with zero demonstrable proof that the individuals being killed have done anything illegal, and zero demonstrable proof that the rest of the nations on this planet have authorized us here in the U.S. to be judge, jury and executioner on the high (international water) seas?

This is madness. We’re living in madness.

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone asked why the US is going after the small fry while Trump just pardoned one of the biggest narco traffickers ever?