Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reid’s Recommendation:

WESTERN

Why did they not consider "Oak Hill?"

Some said it was too close to "Oakton" but, "Western" is not close to Westfield?

Sure beats naming it after a person, though.

Maybe it is all those people mocking Oak Hill as a name for 20171, even though that is what it is.

I like Oak Hill. But that name was not one of ten choices for the survey. In fact none of choices is a geographical name.

I am glad Western is Reid’s final choice though. Better than the other nine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reid’s Recommendation:

WESTERN

Why did they not consider "Oak Hill?"

Some said it was too close to "Oakton" but, "Western" is not close to Westfield?

Sure beats naming it after a person, though.

Maybe it is all those people mocking Oak Hill as a name for 20171, even though that is what it is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Squander HS

Unique facility, once in a lifetime opportunity, instead of taking advantage of that let's spend money to try and convert it into a traditional high school

I would just LOOOOOVE to hear your proposal for "taking advantage" of the "once in a lifetime opportunity" that would not require additional spending!!

Yes, please share!

There's no way you can open this high school without spending a lot of money -- even a STEM focused school would still need to update preschool and kindergarten classrooms, make a school library, bigger cafeterias, and have sports fields. Not a sound argument!

The school will be providing education for its students--do you not realize that there is a lot of spending going on in the overcrowded schools to make the facility work? Shorter commutes will free up some dollars, as well. Fewer bus drivers needed and fewer buses.

I'm not sure why you're arguing with me?

We are supposed to be loving and creative here after FCPS conveniently dropped this bombshell on us after class of 2025 graduated.

Therefore, I agree with you that we should not be argumentative.

But yes, some facility work will be necessary to FCPS-ify it.

The person arguing with you is clearly a Langley parent deeply impacted by White Privilege and Affluenza.

Gotta love social justice warriors baselessly labeling a majority minority school with white privilege.

You’re the reason that the other political party is so successful.

I named Langley hunty, not someone other school.

You're literally the only person on this board that uses that word and so we all know how dumb you are, babe

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Squander HS

Unique facility, once in a lifetime opportunity, instead of taking advantage of that let's spend money to try and convert it into a traditional high school

I would just LOOOOOVE to hear your proposal for "taking advantage" of the "once in a lifetime opportunity" that would not require additional spending!!

Yes, please share!

There's no way you can open this high school without spending a lot of money -- even a STEM focused school would still need to update preschool and kindergarten classrooms, make a school library, bigger cafeterias, and have sports fields. Not a sound argument!

The school will be providing education for its students--do you not realize that there is a lot of spending going on in the overcrowded schools to make the facility work? Shorter commutes will free up some dollars, as well. Fewer bus drivers needed and fewer buses.

I'm not sure why you're arguing with me?

We are supposed to be loving and creative here after FCPS conveniently dropped this bombshell on us after class of 2025 graduated.

Therefore, I agree with you that we should not be argumentative.

But yes, some facility work will be necessary to FCPS-ify it.

The person arguing with you is clearly a Langley parent deeply impacted by White Privilege and Affluenza.

Gotta love social justice warriors baselessly labeling a majority minority school with white privilege.

You’re the reason that the other political party is so successful.

I named Langley hunty, not someone other school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Squander HS

Unique facility, once in a lifetime opportunity, instead of taking advantage of that let's spend money to try and convert it into a traditional high school

I would just LOOOOOVE to hear your proposal for "taking advantage" of the "once in a lifetime opportunity" that would not require additional spending!!

Yes, please share!

There's no way you can open this high school without spending a lot of money -- even a STEM focused school would still need to update preschool and kindergarten classrooms, make a school library, bigger cafeterias, and have sports fields. Not a sound argument!

The school will be providing education for its students--do you not realize that there is a lot of spending going on in the overcrowded schools to make the facility work? Shorter commutes will free up some dollars, as well. Fewer bus drivers needed and fewer buses.

I'm not sure why you're arguing with me?

We are supposed to be loving and creative here after FCPS conveniently dropped this bombshell on us after class of 2025 graduated.

Therefore, I agree with you that we should not be argumentative.

But yes, some facility work will be necessary to FCPS-ify it.

The person arguing with you is clearly a Langley parent deeply impacted by White Privilege and Affluenza.

Gotta love social justice warriors baselessly labeling a majority minority school with white privilege.

You’re the reason that the other political party is so successful.

Anonymous wrote:Squander HS

Unique facility, once in a lifetime opportunity, instead of taking advantage of that let's spend money to try and convert it into a traditional high school