Anonymous wrote:I didn’t realize Mayor-elect Mamdani has a plan to eliminate the NYPD overtime budget. That would have a substantial economic impact on every one of the NYPD’s 34,000 officers. Officers would, and should leave if the mayor actively takes money from them. As officers leave, the burden of policing NYC falls on a smaller force. Why would officers work overtime to make up for the departures if they aren’t going to get overtime pay?
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/16/nyregion/nypd-mamdani-expectations.html
Back in reality…
What Is Mamdani’s Police / Public-Safety Reform Plan (Overtime & Beyond)
1. Creation of a Department of Community Safety (DCS)
• Mamdani proposes a new civilian-led Department of Community Safety with a proposed $1.1 billion budget. 
• The DCS would handle things like mental-health crises, violence prevention, and social services — shifting these responsibilities away from the police in some cases. 
• Specifically, he wants mental health outreach workers to respond to emotionally disturbed individuals: for example, in subway stations, these teams would go instead of police to de-escalate and connect people to care. 
• The campaign argues that this would free up police officers to focus more on serious crime (shootings, murders, etc.). 
2. Cutting Police Overtime
• As part of his reform, Mamdani has said he would reduce or cut the NYPD’s overtime budget. 
• He frames this not as shrinking the size of the police force, but reallocating some of their work: taking away lower-level or non-urgent tasks that don’t necessarily require an armed officer. 
• He has also criticized the NYPD’s “communications budget” (which may tie into overall spending inefficiencies) and wants to reorient funds toward prevention and social-service responses. 
3. Maintaining Police Staffing (But Changing Their Role)
• Importantly, Mamdani does not plan to drastically shrink the NYPD. He has said he’ll keep the current size more or less stable. 
• The idea is that, with some calls diverted to the DCS, the police can concentrate on core public-safety work (violent crime, serious calls) rather than being “stretched thin” doing social-worker-type work. 
• In his vision, the police and the new DCS coexist and cooperate: they’re not mutually exclusive.
4. Addressing Response Times and Effectiveness
• Mamdani argues that by having social-service experts handle non-violent/emotional calls, response times to serious crime could improve because police are less burdened. 
• He also argues that many calls currently handled by police are “gaps” — mental health crises, homelessness — that are better handled by trained outreach workers. 
5. Funding the Plan
• Part of the $1.1B for the DCS would be reallocated from existing programs (about $605 million), while the rest (~$455 million) would come from new funding. 
• He intends to raise some of this money through increased taxes, especially targeting wealthier neighborhoods. (That’s part of his broader affordability / redistribution agenda.) 
6. Walk-Back / Moderation of Earlier “Defund” Rhetoric
• Mamdani has walked back some of his earlier, more radical “defund the police” language. 
• He now argues for a more nuanced approach: not abolition, but restructuring — changing how and when police are used, and giving other actors (social workers, mental-health professionals) a formal, institutional role.