Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link
I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_
This has nothing to do with Reid’s unjustifiable security position. Start a separate thread!
It does if it is true.
Boundary study
Feds
Centreville issue
Football
All are very divisive topics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link
I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_
This has nothing to do with Reid’s unjustifiable security position. Start a separate thread!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link
I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link
I don't vouch for this guy, never heard of him, but his report is getting amplified very quickly. His user name is @WCdispatch_
Anonymous wrote:Post twitter link
Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure why the other thread got deleted, but for anyone wondering about the timing of this additional security may have their answer. The topic was deleted from DCUM but it is blowing up on Twitter. Buckle up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they are preparing to refuse to comply with the demands of the feds. .
This may be true. Reid thinks having security will protect her from the feds.
Give me a break. The question is can a FOIA request get this info? Do we have the right to know? Is there a threat to the whole school system, but she is only protecting herself?
This is serious and we need answers. Many of us face vague threats-needing to reprimand or fire the employee who sees like he/she might be the type to go postal, the solicitor who shows up at your door and you politely decline services and they start cursing at you, etc. I know teachers who have been directly threatened by students. Getting actual security is a big deal. This is not about boundary changes. Something is up. You think superintendents around the country don't face vague threats? It would take a credible threat at the very least to make this happen. Also, why can't she just ask local police to be at an event? How does this work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they are preparing to refuse to comply with the demands of the feds. .
This may be true. Reid thinks having security will protect her from the feds.
Anonymous wrote:Dr. Reid, read the room:
90+% of constituents against boundary changes
90+% of constituents against boys in girls sports
Majority of constituents against DEI as implemented at FCPS
99+% of constituents against bodyguard for superintendent
Anonymous wrote:I think they are preparing to refuse to comply with the demands of the feds. .