Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More people posting here than people under age 75 who watched his boring graft pit show. $100 million a year budget for a truly painfully unfunny 4 hours a week? 200 overpaid hacks stealing paychecks.

Sorry you can’t recognize a real talent.

I won’t even bother asking who you find funny.

It doesn't really matter. None of those night shows perform well. None of them. He could be hilarious and we're still just going to watch Netflix. The vast majority of people under 60 years old are on streamers and you can always tell how old someone is if they start complaining about Fox News. Like okay, but only retirees are watching it so settle down.

You don’t cancel a show because the president had a tantrum because he doesn’t like getting made fun of. Totally unacceptable. Is that the kind of place you want to be in? May as well be in Russia.

Since that's not why the show was cancelled, there's no need for you to fret. It's been stated (and cited) multiple times that the show was losing millions for the network. It's a business decision. But do continue concocting political conspiracy theories.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He might have been funny when he first started. He’s only been annoying and preachy for the past few years.

I still find him hilarious. Different strokes for different folks. I guess CBS was too afraid of Trump to keep him on.

Same! Love him.

Despite what that magas on this thread want to believe Colbert is so talented and really does such a great job with all his interviews.

Then why was his show not profitable?

It was profitable.

You have no idea what you are talking about!

This is not a hard concept state media no
First amendment rights hello republican idiots thanks for getting us to North Korea

It’s easy to find plenty of links that talk about how it has been losing roughly $40 million per year at this point. If I weren’t driving right now, I would post some.

I have not seen anything that counters these assertions.

Why cancel now? CBS had ample opportunity to do so. Why now? Because of the merger. Trump can’t handle his feelings being hurt.

They didn't "cancel" the show this week.

He will get to finish his contract. They simply are not renewing the contract

Sure, Chad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More people posting here than people under age 75 who watched his boring graft pit show. $100 million a year budget for a truly painfully unfunny 4 hours a week? 200 overpaid hacks stealing paychecks.

Sorry you can’t recognize a real talent.

I won’t even bother asking who you find funny.

It doesn't really matter. None of those night shows perform well. None of them. He could be hilarious and we're still just going to watch Netflix. The vast majority of people under 60 years old are on streamers and you can always tell how old someone is if they start complaining about Fox News. Like okay, but only retirees are watching it so settle down.

You don’t cancel a show because the president had a tantrum because he doesn’t like getting made fun of. Totally unacceptable. Is that the kind of place you want to be in? May as well be in Russia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His show was losing $40 million per year.

Why cancel it now? Timing is very suspicious.

It's not suspicious at all. If they wanted to silence Colbert, why keep him on the air for an entire year with nothing to lose? The Trump conspiracy theories don't make any sense. He's old and tired, expensive, and then to top it off, he publicly railed against his bosses. I mean.... you can't behave that way, put up loser ratings, get paid $15M per year and keep your job. Come on.

This. The people who desperately want this to be some kind of conspiracy make me laugh. It was a huge money loser for the network. Next.

Pay attention. CBS is in the middle of a merger with skydance. As it drags on, CBS loses millions. Who is in charge of mergers? The federal government is and then you have the biggest baby in charge, Trump, who can’t handle anyone making fun of him. Why do you think they payed for the nonsense 60 minutes settlement? Because they want this merger to go through.

You're the kind of person I just smile and nod at. Like most posters on DCUM. Better to just pretend you're right and not engage. Have a great night!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought it was a fake rumor but it looks like it’s real.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/17/business/stephen-colbert-late-show-ending.html?unlocked_article_code=1.XU8.xFd8.OnMWKg8EMZtR&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

I wish late night talk show hosts weren't all men

💯

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought it was a fake rumor but it looks like it’s real.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/17/business/stephen-colbert-late-show-ending.html?unlocked_article_code=1.XU8.xFd8.OnMWKg8EMZtR&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

I wish late night talk show hosts weren't all men

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump obviously forced the network to do this in order to proceed with the merger, but it is also apparent that network tv is struggling and the late night network shows like this are no longer profitable.

They need a new model at a scaled back cost. They probably don’t need a band (or maybe just a cheaper, smaller band). They probably need to shift the celebrity costs to the celebrity (or film/album/project they are promoting). And the host can’t be paid as much. Otherwise they need to go to a podcast like platform—where some celeb hosts are making tons of money without the big production costs.

Personally, I hope he brings back his Colbert Report persona—perhaps on the Daily Show at first—to skewer this administration that is destroying our democracy and the rule of law.

That character was really funny and Colbert seems to have lost the ability to be funny, unfortunately.

It was funny because he was perfectly satirizing a smug, self-satisfied but unquestioning partisan political blowhard.

Then, in his Late Show role, he actually BECAME that character. That’s why he was no longer funny, and that’s why Americans abandoned the show

That is a really good observation, and true.

He actually reverted to his normal personality--the opposite of that Republican blowhard character. It has won its time slot for years and received numerous awards. I actually think the late night talk show genre has passed its prime but many Americans still watch and enjoy it.

The finances of it are weird because it’s an externalized cost. The part most people like is the opening monologue. That’s pretty short and so many people just watch it on YouTube later. The endless celebrity interviews are mostly boring (but occasionally moderately interesting) but the industry has an interest in having a venue for the celebs to promote their shows so everyone eats the cost in late night shows in order to do that promotion. Otherwise they would have to pay for some other venue to promote shows and movies. The truly unreadable part on every late night show is generally the filler skits which are 90% stupid but occasionally moderately interesting or amusing
(like the time jimmy Kimmel had his cousin pose as a Costco returns person giving people crap over their returns).

Anonymous wrote:I thought it was a fake rumor but it looks like it’s real.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/17/business/stephen-colbert-late-show-ending.html?unlocked_article_code=1.XU8.xFd8.OnMWKg8EMZtR&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump obviously forced the network to do this in order to proceed with the merger, but it is also apparent that network tv is struggling and the late night network shows like this are no longer profitable.

They need a new model at a scaled back cost. They probably don’t need a band (or maybe just a cheaper, smaller band). They probably need to shift the celebrity costs to the celebrity (or film/album/project they are promoting). And the host can’t be paid as much. Otherwise they need to go to a podcast like platform—where some celeb hosts are making tons of money without the big production costs.

Personally, I hope he brings back his Colbert Report persona—perhaps on the Daily Show at first—to skewer this administration that is destroying our democracy and the rule of law.

That character was really funny and Colbert seems to have lost the ability to be funny, unfortunately.

It was funny because he was perfectly satirizing a smug, self-satisfied but unquestioning partisan political blowhard.

Then, in his Late Show role, he actually BECAME that character. That’s why he was no longer funny, and that’s why Americans abandoned the show

That is a really good observation, and true.

He actually reverted to his normal personality--the opposite of that Republican blowhard character. It has won its time slot for years and received numerous awards. I actually think the late night talk show genre has passed its prime but many Americans still watch and enjoy it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump obviously forced the network to do this in order to proceed with the merger, but it is also apparent that network tv is struggling and the late night network shows like this are no longer profitable.

They need a new model at a scaled back cost. They probably don’t need a band (or maybe just a cheaper, smaller band). They probably need to shift the celebrity costs to the celebrity (or film/album/project they are promoting). And the host can’t be paid as much. Otherwise they need to go to a podcast like platform—where some celeb hosts are making tons of money without the big production costs.

Personally, I hope he brings back his Colbert Report persona—perhaps on the Daily Show at first—to skewer this administration that is destroying our democracy and the rule of law.

That character was really funny and Colbert seems to have lost the ability to be funny, unfortunately.

It was funny because he was perfectly satirizing a smug, self-satisfied but unquestioning partisan political blowhard.

Then, in his Late Show role, he actually BECAME that character. That’s why he was no longer funny, and that’s why Americans abandoned the show

That is a really good observation, and true.

Anonymous wrote:I haven’t watched a late night show in years. Anything worth watching from one shows up as a 30 sec clip the next day, and 30 sec is the most that’s worth watching. I can’t imagine sitting through an hour of one, every weeknight? Pointless. Cancel them all. None of them are worth $100 million!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump obviously forced the network to do this in order to proceed with the merger, but it is also apparent that network tv is struggling and the late night network shows like this are no longer profitable.

They need a new model at a scaled back cost. They probably don’t need a band (or maybe just a cheaper, smaller band). They probably need to shift the celebrity costs to the celebrity (or film/album/project they are promoting). And the host can’t be paid as much. Otherwise they need to go to a podcast like platform—where some celeb hosts are making tons of money without the big production costs.

Personally, I hope he brings back his Colbert Report persona—perhaps on the Daily Show at first—to skewer this administration that is destroying our democracy and the rule of law.

That character was really funny and Colbert seems to have lost the ability to be funny, unfortunately.

It was funny because he was perfectly satirizing a smug, self-satisfied but unquestioning partisan political blowhard.

Then, in his Late Show role, he actually BECAME that character. That’s why he was no longer funny, and that’s why Americans abandoned the show

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More people posting here than people under age 75 who watched his boring graft pit show. $100 million a year budget for a truly painfully unfunny 4 hours a week? 200 overpaid hacks stealing paychecks.

Sorry you can’t recognize a real talent.

I won’t even bother asking who you find funny.

It doesn't really matter. None of those night shows perform well. None of them. He could be hilarious and we're still just going to watch Netflix. The vast majority of people under 60 years old are on streamers and you can always tell how old someone is if they start complaining about Fox News. Like okay, but only retirees are watching it so settle down.

You don’t cancel a show because the president had a tantrum because he doesn’t like getting made fun of. Totally unacceptable. Is that the kind of place you want to be in? May as well be in Russia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More people posting here than people under age 75 who watched his boring graft pit show. $100 million a year budget for a truly painfully unfunny 4 hours a week? 200 overpaid hacks stealing paychecks.

Sorry you can’t recognize a real talent.

I won’t even bother asking who you find funny.

It doesn't really matter. None of those night shows perform well. None of them. He could be hilarious and we're still just going to watch Netflix. The vast majority of people under 60 years old are on streamers and you can always tell how old someone is if they start complaining about Fox News. Like okay, but only retirees are watching it so settle down.