Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised (and maybe I’ve missed it) that no one has mentioned grants and subsidies that foreign governments use to fund their students abroad. For example, my kids roommates at an Ivy included two internationals who had most (or all? I didn’t press for details) of their tuition paid for by the governments of their countries. For one of them, repayment required x years of national service in a specific area of government, but it was a country that required national service anyway.
Foreign governments don't just pay tuition. They do fund research at these universities or provide some other enticement.
Foreign governments absolutely paid tuition directly for certain students. This was in the 80s and 90s. Maybe changed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m surprised (and maybe I’ve missed it) that no one has mentioned grants and subsidies that foreign governments use to fund their students abroad. For example, my kids roommates at an Ivy included two internationals who had most (or all? I didn’t press for details) of their tuition paid for by the governments of their countries. For one of them, repayment required x years of national service in a specific area of government, but it was a country that required national service anyway.
Foreign governments don't just pay tuition. They do fund research at these universities or provide some other enticement.
Anonymous wrote:LOL, Trump is doing this because Baron was not accepted at Stanford, Harvard, and Columbia.
Funny because out of all of Trump's kids, Baron is the only one with some brain cells.
He will come for retribution at some point. He is his mother's son. It's not going to be Don Jr in 2028 it will be Barron because they will remove the age restrictions watch and wait.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other countries, international students need to pay a lot more than domestic students.
As they do here....in general at least as they are not eligible for aid.
Internationals are not eligible for need-based aid at publics and at many privates. However, several top schools indeed give a large amount of need-based aid to internationals. You can see this data in section H6 of the Common Data Set. (Harvard gives $53M per year in institutional grants to internationals)
These pretty much go to international graduate students, except for a few.
Check section H6. This is for undergrad only.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am absolutely all for gifted international students coming to the US for college. I think it’s a positive all around. And I get how some low endowment schools need the income of full pay international students to make things work.
But the NY Times had an article today listing the schools with the most international students. I think it’s nuts that more than 30 percent of students at Columbia, Chicago, CMU, Hopkins, and Northeastern are international. I get it for CalTech, but that’s such a specialized school. We definitely have a big enough talent pool of students - including full pay students - to fill those classes at those schools. So I’m perplexed why schools like Columbia and Northeastern are choosing to be so heavily international
Let me introduce you to the concept known as "money". Those schools have a heavy STEM presence. China and India have an endless supply of students who could go toe to toe with top US students. So it is an easy win, win, win for all. The college gets whip-smart students, more money, and the student gets a chance to work in the US or bring that degree back home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be a good thing if the top US schools educated and prepared more US students? Is what's happening at harvard a blessing in disguise?
Maybe the government should limit the number of international students at all top schools. Getting in and the cost of attending is just too much.
NO!
-Left leaning moderate who does not want the government dictating every decision!
Anonymous wrote:Let's just go full N. Korea and just wrap ourselves in the flags and weapons. 🤷
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other countries, international students need to pay a lot more than domestic students.
As they do here....in general at least as they are not eligible for aid.
Internationals are not eligible for need-based aid at publics and at many privates. However, several top schools indeed give a large amount of need-based aid to internationals. You can see this data in section H6 of the Common Data Set. (Harvard gives $53M per year in institutional grants to internationals)
These pretty much go to international graduate students, except for a few.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other countries, international students need to pay a lot more than domestic students.
As they do here....in general at least as they are not eligible for aid.
Internationals are not eligible for need-based aid at publics and at many privates. However, several top schools indeed give a large amount of need-based aid to internationals. You can see this data in section H6 of the Common Data Set. (Harvard gives $53M per year in institutional grants to internationals)
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn't it be a good thing if the top US schools educated and prepared more US students? Is what's happening at harvard a blessing in disguise?
Maybe the government should limit the number of international students at all top schools. Getting in and the cost of attending is just too much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In other countries, international students need to pay a lot more than domestic students.
As they do here....in general at least as they are not eligible for aid.