Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In a COURT HOUSE, not a COURT ROOM. That is the difference. She didn't want the circus in HER COURT ROOM.
Could you please post a link that can prove your assertion that the federal agents planned to effect the arrest in the court room?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
BTW, getting arrested in the court house is not unusual. If a suspect has an appointment with the court, a lawyer, you know he might be there. I knew a friend whose ex husband had her arrested (detained actually, not fully arrested) in front of the court house for violating a civil protective order. During her divorce. They had probably 5 million in assets together. They released her shortly thereafter. But it was messy. The more you know the less crazy these things sound!
What we are actually witnessing is policing. Policing everywhere.
The judge was shady and will now have a hearing. I doubt they held her long. It’s rough, but the feds are making her an example by charging her. People are shocked bc they never see policing in their tender neighborhoods. These police actions are actually helping low income people who suffer the most from criminal actions in their neighborhoods. Ask the neighbors how they feel. The rich people are sad when they read about it in their sunlit kitchens. Just another angle. Wealthy people don’t usually feel the impact of crime or resource pressures bc their kids go to private school and their neighborhoods are isolated.
He is not doing this for his mega donors
In a COURT HOUSE, not a COURT ROOM. That is the difference. She didn't want the circus in HER COURT ROOM.
So what? Her courtroom is a public place where agents can lawfully make an arrest without a judicial warrant. Her desire to avoid “a circus” has nothing to do with anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
BTW, getting arrested in the court house is not unusual. If a suspect has an appointment with the court, a lawyer, you know he might be there. I knew a friend whose ex husband had her arrested (detained actually, not fully arrested) in front of the court house for violating a civil protective order. During her divorce. They had probably 5 million in assets together. They released her shortly thereafter. But it was messy. The more you know the less crazy these things sound!
What we are actually witnessing is policing. Policing everywhere.
The judge was shady and will now have a hearing. I doubt they held her long. It’s rough, but the feds are making her an example by charging her. People are shocked bc they never see policing in their tender neighborhoods. These police actions are actually helping low income people who suffer the most from criminal actions in their neighborhoods. Ask the neighbors how they feel. The rich people are sad when they read about it in their sunlit kitchens. Just another angle. Wealthy people don’t usually feel the impact of crime or resource pressures bc their kids go to private school and their neighborhoods are isolated.
He is not doing this for his mega donors
In a COURT HOUSE, not a COURT ROOM. That is the difference. She didn't want the circus in HER COURT ROOM.
Anonymous wrote:In a COURT HOUSE, not a COURT ROOM. That is the difference. She didn't want the circus in HER COURT ROOM.
Anonymous wrote:
BTW, getting arrested in the court house is not unusual. If a suspect has an appointment with the court, a lawyer, you know he might be there. I knew a friend whose ex husband had her arrested (detained actually, not fully arrested) in front of the court house for violating a civil protective order. During her divorce. They had probably 5 million in assets together. They released her shortly thereafter. But it was messy. The more you know the less crazy these things sound!
What we are actually witnessing is policing. Policing everywhere.
The judge was shady and will now have a hearing. I doubt they held her long. It’s rough, but the feds are making her an example by charging her. People are shocked bc they never see policing in their tender neighborhoods. These police actions are actually helping low income people who suffer the most from criminal actions in their neighborhoods. Ask the neighbors how they feel. The rich people are sad when they read about it in their sunlit kitchens. Just another angle. Wealthy people don’t usually feel the impact of crime or resource pressures bc their kids go to private school and their neighborhoods are isolated.
He is not doing this for his mega donors
Anonymous wrote:For all the lefties out there, that judge probably sent hundreds of poor boys to jail and then left her chambers by five pm everyday to catch up with her friends. You think she cares? Let’s look at her track record.
She knows exactly what she is doing.
The bleeding hearts need to know how nasty some judges can be. She made a mistake. She is not immune from consequences.
Anonymous wrote:
BTW, getting arrested in the court house is not unusual. If a suspect has an appointment with the court, a lawyer, you know he might be there. I knew a friend whose ex husband had her arrested (detained actually, not fully arrested) in front of the court house for violating a civil protective order. During her divorce. They had probably 5 million in assets together. They released her shortly thereafter. But it was messy. The more you know the less crazy these things sound!
What we are actually witnessing is policing. Policing everywhere.
The judge was shady and will now have a hearing. I doubt they held her long. It’s rough, but the feds are making her an example by charging her. People are shocked bc they never see policing in their tender neighborhoods. These police actions are actually helping low income people who suffer the most from criminal actions in their neighborhoods. Ask the neighbors how they feel. The rich people are sad when they read about it in their sunlit kitchens. Just another angle. Wealthy people don’t usually feel the impact of crime or resource pressures bc their kids go to private school and their neighborhoods are isolated.
He is not doing this for his mega donors
And if ICE had stopped him IN FRONT OF the courthouse with their administrative warrant, there wouldn't have been an issue. But they ENTERED the courthouse with the wrong paperwork, then had a hissy fitAnonymous wrote:
BTW, getting arrested in the court house is not unusual. If a suspect has an appointment with the court, a lawyer, you know he might be there. I knew a friend whose ex husband had her arrested (detained actually, not fully arrested) in front of the court house for violating a civil protective order. During her divorce. They had probably 5 million in assets together. They released her shortly thereafter. But it was messy. The more you know the less crazy these things sound!
What we are actually witnessing is policing. Policing everywhere.
The judge was shady and will now have a hearing. I doubt they held her long. It’s rough, but the feds are making her an example by charging her. People are shocked bc they never see policing in their tender neighborhoods. These police actions are actually helping low income people who suffer the most from criminal actions in their neighborhoods. Ask the neighbors how they feel. The rich people are sad when they read about it in their sunlit kitchens. Just another angle. Wealthy people don’t usually feel the impact of crime or resource pressures bc their kids go to private school and their neighborhoods are isolated.
He is not doing this for his mega donors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Goebbels lied a lot back in the bad. Did not mean any of it was true. No one in their right mind would believe DHS.
This attitude is what got Trump elected.
No, but a bunch of low information voters did that. They are clearly still here and haven’t learned a thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Goebbels lied a lot back in the bad. Did not mean any of it was true. No one in their right mind would believe DHS.
This attitude is what got Trump elected.
Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?
Anonymous wrote:From the FBI affidavit (after DEA Agent A rode the elevator down with the suspect and his attorney):
“After DEA Agent A notified the team that Flores-Ruiz was in the front of the courthouse near the flagpole, the agents ran towards the front of the courthouse. FBI Agent B and DEA Agent A approached Flores-Ruiz and identified themselves as law enforcement. Flores-Ruiz turned around and sprinted down the street.”
This suggests to me that the judge did not tell him ICE was there for him. If he knew that, why would he not have immediately fled the minute he stepped out of the courthouse? Why would he stand in front of the courthouse when he knew ICE was there and only flee after he saw several men running in his direction?
The affidavit also says the judge asked whether it was a judicial or administrative warrant, which I think she did because she wanted to preserve the integrity of her courtroom. She wanted to know what they were allowed to do and sent them to the chief judge to make sure they were following policy. She went back to her courtroom because she had cases to hear. My guess is she told the guy and his lawyer that she was continuing his case because she didn’t want a circus outside her courtroom that would discourage undocumented individuals from appearing in court for fear of ICE.
And my only aim is to defend the rule of law. Without that, we have nothing and are all at risk.