Anonymous wrote:Fyi, this is not a winning Shark Tank argument.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the barrier to GA offering free soccer like MLS Academies is money, focus on what would solve the barrier and don't just dream it away.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.
I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.
Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.
This is all you ever say.
It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.
Kang's $30 million over 5 years is going to USSF to fund what they should have already funded, not to start an NWSL Next or give cash to an endowment fund for GA or ECNL.
I'm not pro or anti GA or ECNL but if some wants a catalyst for change, it's going to cost money.
I have a feeling there's a reason you don't run a soccer league. Sports might not be your thing. Maybe try accounting.
Fyi, this is not a winning Shark Tank argument.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the barrier to GA offering free soccer like MLS Academies is money, focus on what would solve the barrier and don't just dream it away.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.
I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.
Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.
This is all you ever say.
It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.
Kang's $30 million over 5 years is going to USSF to fund what they should have already funded, not to start an NWSL Next or give cash to an endowment fund for GA or ECNL.
I'm not pro or anti GA or ECNL but if some wants a catalyst for change, it's going to cost money.
I have a feeling there's a reason you don't run a soccer league. Sports might not be your thing. Maybe try accounting.
Reposting means what to you?Anonymous wrote:ECNL didn’t repost/share the news about Kang’s investment…The GA did…..let that sink in for a sec
Anonymous wrote:ECNL didn’t repost/share the news about Kang’s investment…The GA did…..let that sink in for a sec
Anonymous wrote:ECNL didn’t repost/share the news about Kang’s investment…The GA did…..let that sink in for a sec
Anonymous wrote:If the barrier to GA offering free soccer like MLS Academies is money, focus on what would solve the barrier and don't just dream it away.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.
I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.
Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.
This is all you ever say.
It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.
Kang's $30 million over 5 years is going to USSF to fund what they should have already funded, not to start an NWSL Next or give cash to an endowment fund for GA or ECNL.
I'm not pro or anti GA or ECNL but if some wants a catalyst for change, it's going to cost money.
If the barrier to GA offering free soccer like MLS Academies is money, focus on what would solve the barrier and don't just dream it away.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.
I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.
Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.
This is all you ever say.
It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only way to counter this is for ECNL to once and for all accept the last 5-10 big clubs from GA. If they don’t do this in 25/26…things can go very very south.
ECNL could have done this for several years and chose not to.
As soon as one girls ECNL trades for MLSN and GA the floodgates will open.
Anonymous wrote:The only way to counter this is for ECNL to once and for all accept the last 5-10 big clubs from GA. If they don’t do this in 25/26…things can go very very south.
Anonymous wrote:Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.
I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.
Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.
Anonymous wrote:So after reading the comments on fb and ig here is what I’m seeing.
Comments that are saying this is no different than the alliance they claimed to have in 2020.
Comments from ecnl parents that seem worried that mls/mlsn/ga are coming for ecnl girls.
Comments that are saying that only the 48 clubs with both ga/mls next will benefit from this alliance — putting clubs with ecnl/MLS next in a tough spot.
All in all, it appears that a good bunch of people fear that ecnl is now at some what of a risk, or at least ecnl parents are now a bit worried.
This alliance news has now gotten more attention than when ga received full sponsorship from us soccer.
Imagine mls next making clubs shift from ecnl to ga and imagine ga making clubs with boys ecnl to go mls next.
Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.
I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.
Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.