Honestly, I have never thought about S*x so much until this government took power. It’s like an everyday topic for them. They are so spreading it around all of the time like rumors. then it ricochets bc well it’s juicy. Now the press says not to trust the press???

I have to tune out. I am getting more perverse the more I read the weird material coming out of DC. Can someone tell DC powers that be to stop reporting that topic? It’s been four weeks now!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I trust billionaires even less than the media

That's not saying much when billionaires own and control the media LOL.

Can Musk or Jeff billionaires buy us something or share something nice? I am so exhausted by this negativity and dirty S*x talk. Where is my 5000 to help me put up with all of the garbage in the news and weird emails and videos set to music?

Just give me my money already .

Ps. Buy your wife a shirt while you are at it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I finally cancelled today. I have been a subscriber since college (a long time ago) The woman tried to convince me to keep it for the coupons!?

Looking for better sources...please give suggestions

X/Twitter is 100 times better and it’s free. But you do need to spend some time filtering out the noise.

Anonymous wrote:NY Times and WAPO look like a rigged game.

But the Las Vegas Rev-Journal doesn’t somehow catch your attention too?

Anonymous wrote:I finally cancelled today. I have been a subscriber since college (a long time ago) The woman tried to convince me to keep it for the coupons!?

Looking for better sources...please give suggestions

I finally cancelled today. I have been a subscriber since college (a long time ago) The woman tried to convince me to keep it for the coupons!?

I made a separate post that got deleted. The WaPo Op/Ed director is gone and the section will now only focus on “personal liberties and free markets” per Bezos.

I guess he decided that Democracy can die in darkness after all.

https://apple.news/Au9lOd2Z6QHKo5kaE4TDToQ

NY Times and WAPO look like a rigged game.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Endorsements mean nothing to me at this point.

https://noahveltman.com/endorsements/

Fascinating how many papers were straight red to 2016 and then went blue or obtained. I think that’s pretty telling, pp.

Yes they hate Trump specifically but did not used to hate conservatives. I could vote republican but never Trump. That doesn't indicate bias, it indicates sanity.

Abstained - my autocorrect hates me after the update

Anonymous wrote:Endorsements mean nothing to me at this point.

https://noahveltman.com/endorsements/

Fascinating how many papers were straight red to 2016 and then went blue or obtained. I think that’s pretty telling, pp.

Endorsements mean nothing to me at this point.

https://noahveltman.com/endorsements/

Anonymous wrote:Perhaps someone somewhere was upset by today’s WaPo exclusive on Musk’s $38 billion in government grants??

Which is even sadder at how weak and greedy Bezos is. Cuckholdery is not hot.

Anonymous wrote:Stop reading it. Cancel subscriptions. I understand it's not fair for journalists. I'm a federal worker about to be fired. We have got to stop accepting ANY of this.

We’ve cancelled and aren’t resuming, independent news is the way. It is sad because we’ve had a subscription for 25+ years.

Though I subscribe to Apple News and like political coverage from Rolling Stone, Wired, and even WSJ. I usually vehemently disagree with the WSJ opinion board, but they are occasionally calling him out. They said his stunt siding with Putin was stupid and you can’t debate policy if you “can’t tell the truth about who started the war.” They actually used the word “truth” instead of “falsely claimed.”

Perhaps someone somewhere was upset by today’s WaPo exclusive on Musk’s $38 billion in government grants??