Anonymous wrote:Walz is making the rookie mistake of turning his head to look at Vance.

Sigh. He's losing the debate.

I expected it, and it won't change anything in the polls.

Vance keeps doing it too.

Walz looks like a deer in the headlights

This is what debates used to look like. Kind of refreshing, but I’m sure some people want personal attacks and yelling.

Walz is making the rookie mistake of turning his head to look at Vance.

Sigh. He's losing the debate.

I expected it, and it won't change anything in the polls.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Vance is so much more polished and smooth! Also more handsome!

And I am so glad the VP debates never count! Because Vance is also a vicious, opportunist liar and I hope he gets his karma.

🤮🤮🤮

Hey, I'm honest. I hate the guy, but he looks better and speaks better than Walz, who is a nice, decent person, and the better choice for VP.

No, just no. Vance went too heavy on the eyeliner.

Vance didn't answer if he believes that climate change is a hoax or not.

Vance is very good. Walz is fine, but not great.

Prediction: This debate won't change anything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vance is a talented orator for sure. He is the much much better speaker. Waltz is better than Harris, but he looks like he is missing his teeth.

? Harris is a great debater, and Vance is too. Walz seems little lost in this league.

He seems calm and collected.

Anonymous wrote:
Vance is so much more polished and smooth![b] Also more handsome!

And I am so glad the VP debates never count! Because Vance is also a vicious, opportunist liar and I hope he gets his karma.

Eww. Now we know you are lying!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Vance is so much more polished and smooth! Also more handsome!

And I am so glad the VP debates never count! Because Vance is also a vicious, opportunist liar and I hope he gets his karma.

🤮🤮🤮

Hey, I'm honest. I hate the guy, but he looks better and speaks better than Walz, who is a nice, decent person, and the better choice for VP.

Walz just totally tore into Trump!

Anonymous wrote:Vance is a talented orator for sure. He is the much much better speaker. Waltz is better than Harris, but he looks like he is missing his teeth.

? Harris is a great debater, and Vance is too. Walz seems little lost in this league.

Anonymous wrote:
Vance is so much more polished and smooth! Also more handsome!

And I am so glad the VP debates never count! Because Vance is also a vicious, opportunist liar and I hope he gets his karma.

🤮🤮🤮

What does Vance mean that his grandmother required Social Security assistance "to raise him"? She either got benefits for herself or, if there were benefits attached to him, they would have been: SS benefits available if his mother was fund to be disabled (which is very hard if the primary disability is drug addiction) or his father (not enough info), or they would have been TANF benefits for children in foster care (TANF pays more money to relatives who foster children than it would to the child's immediate family.

So why didn't he just say they got welfare payments or TANF for him?

Anonymous wrote:Harris should have picked Shapiro. Walz is not ready for prime time.

He's doing fine.