Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PVI vs Pendence is a bloodbath already. Seems like Dave’s boys don’t even want to be here. 93 looks like he’s been told to keep it clean and is itching to make a dirty play. Typical Pendence.

So this was just another flat out fabrication by this guy who calls them “pendence”?

Is 93 the Indy Slasher?

I am so confused.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s give Indy some credit. I certainly didn’t expect them to beat Yorktown. and play competitive games with the likes of PVI, Madison, and Langley.

I agree I have been a hater of Indy on this forum, some of it for good reason. Their character deserves hating, but their level of play definitely does not. So props to Indy on an extremely good game against PVI and in general solid play.

The scores of these games and their relationship to the spring are about equal to how the scores in preseason football or spring training games matter to who is going to win during the season. It is amusing and enjoyable to watch but there generally is no transitive properties from VEL to regular season.

Dodgers and Orioles won the Cactus and Grapefruit Leagues, respectively.

I don't follow baseball, so I can't tell if the PP is agreeing or disagreeing with the concept that VEL tells you very little about how teams would do against each other in-season at full strength.

But it should be obvious that they don't tell you very much. Look at Indy. They lost to Langley and to Madison. But they lost to PVI by 3, while the other two teams lost by 15 or more. Obviously those four teams were not bringing the same roster to all of their games. Right?

I am the op of this thread. I could answer your question and add a bunch of insight, but I am now keeping it to myself..
I check in here about every 10 days and laugh.

I refuse to post about what I see and know as many just have to be pains in the butt.

I will leave you with, yes, you can get a bit of a picture of things. Is it the whole picture, nothing ever is, even in spring.

Are there reasons for the Indy,PVI, Madison and Langley disparity. Yes, I could shed some light, but figure them out for yourself at this point.

PP that I am quoting, this is not an attack on you I am really speaking to only a select few posters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s give Indy some credit. I certainly didn’t expect them to beat Yorktown. and play competitive games with the likes of PVI, Madison, and Langley.

I agree I have been a hater of Indy on this forum, some of it for good reason. Their character deserves hating, but their level of play definitely does not. So props to Indy on an extremely good game against PVI and in general solid play.

The scores of these games and their relationship to the spring are about equal to how the scores in preseason football or spring training games matter to who is going to win during the season. It is amusing and enjoyable to watch but there generally is no transitive properties from VEL to regular season.

Dodgers and Orioles won the Cactus and Grapefruit Leagues, respectively.

I don't follow baseball, so I can't tell if the PP is agreeing or disagreeing with the concept that VEL tells you very little about how teams would do against each other in-season at full strength.

But it should be obvious that they don't tell you very much. Look at Indy. They lost to Langley and to Madison. But they lost to PVI by 3, while the other two teams lost by 15 or more. Obviously those four teams were not bringing the same roster to all of their games. Right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s give Indy some credit. I certainly didn’t expect them to beat Yorktown. and play competitive games with the likes of PVI, Madison, and Langley.

I agree I have been a hater of Indy on this forum, some of it for good reason. Their character deserves hating, but their level of play definitely does not. So props to Indy on an extremely good game against PVI and in general solid play.

The scores of these games and their relationship to the spring are about equal to how the scores in preseason football or spring training games matter to who is going to win during the season. It is amusing and enjoyable to watch but there generally is no transitive properties from VEL to regular season.

Dodgers and Orioles won the Cactus and Grapefruit Leagues, respectively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s give Indy some credit. I certainly didn’t expect them to beat Yorktown. and play competitive games with the likes of PVI, Madison, and Langley.

I agree I have been a hater of Indy on this forum, some of it for good reason. Their character deserves hating, but their level of play definitely does not. So props to Indy on an extremely good game against PVI and in general solid play.

The scores of these games and their relationship to the spring are about equal to how the scores in preseason football or spring training games matter to who is going to win during the season. It is amusing and enjoyable to watch but there generally is no transitive properties from VEL to regular season.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let’s give Indy some credit. I certainly didn’t expect them to beat Yorktown. and play competitive games with the likes of PVI, Madison, and Langley.

I agree I have been a hater of Indy on this forum, some of it for good reason. Their character deserves hating, but their level of play definitely does not. So props to Indy on an extremely good game against PVI and in general solid play.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Came to see if anybody was talking X’s and O’s after not checking for a couple weeks to only find out everyone is talking about the same thing. Get over it, it’s lacrosse and these kids are still maturing. Can’t say the same for some of you in this forum.

Probably the top four public teams squaring off this weekend. I think Robinson takes down Madison by 3-4 and Battlefield takes down Langley by 2-3. BI beats Yorktown by 5+ and PVI beats Indy by 10+.

Half right, half very wrong don’t you say. Robinson and BI were solid takes. PVI one was very wrong and the Battlefield Langley one, YIKES. Maybe avoid posting on here for a lil while.

Anonymous wrote:Let’s give Indy some credit. I certainly didn’t expect them to beat Yorktown. and play competitive games with the likes of PVI, Madison, and Langley.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Came to see if anybody was talking X’s and O’s after not checking for a couple weeks to only find out everyone is talking about the same thing. Get over it, it’s lacrosse and these kids are still maturing. Can’t say the same for some of you in this forum.

Probably the top four public teams squaring off this weekend. I think Robinson takes down Madison by 3-4 and Battlefield takes down Langley by 2-3. BI beats Yorktown by 5+ and PVI beats Indy by 10+.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PVI vs Pendence is a bloodbath already. Seems like Dave’s boys don’t even want to be here. 93 looks like he’s been told to keep it clean and is itching to make a dirty play. Typical Pendence.

So this was just another flat out fabrication by this guy who calls them “pendence”?

Is 93 the Indy Slasher?

I am so confused.

Anonymous wrote:PVI vs Pendence is a bloodbath already. Seems like Dave’s boys don’t even want to be here. 93 looks like he’s been told to keep it clean and is itching to make a dirty play. Typical Pendence.