Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last year, TJ had 35.3% of the VA NMSF. This year, they only have 20.6% of the VA NMSF.
It's a huge drop, no matter how people try to spin things. It should have been obvious to everyone that when you admit kids based on geographic diversity, essays, and experience factors rather than test scores, test scores will drop.
What are the FCPS percentages of VA semifinalists?
FCPS (including TJ) had 56.5% of the VA semifinalists last year. It has 48.6% of the semifinalists this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last year, TJ had 35.3% of the VA NMSF. This year, they only have 20.6% of the VA NMSF.
It's a huge drop, no matter how people try to spin things. It should have been obvious to everyone that when you admit kids based on geographic diversity, essays, and experience factors rather than test scores, test scores will drop.
What are the FCPS percentages of VA semifinalists?
Is VA a lot lower again this year than MD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last year, TJ had 35.3% of the VA NMSF. This year, they only have 20.6% of the VA NMSF.
It's a huge drop, no matter how people try to spin things. It should have been obvious to everyone that when you admit kids based on geographic diversity, essays, and experience factors rather than test scores, test scores will drop.
What are the FCPS percentages of VA semifinalists?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last year, TJ had 35.3% of the VA NMSF. This year, they only have 20.6% of the VA NMSF.
It's a huge drop, no matter how people try to spin things. It should have been obvious to everyone that when you admit kids based on geographic diversity, essays, and experience factors rather than test scores, test scores will drop.
What are the FCPS percentages of VA semifinalists?
FCPS (including TJ) had 56.5% of the VA semifinalists last year. It has 48.6% of the semifinalists this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lol at the fine tooth comb over something so obvious.
What's funny is that they had 4 years to figure out how they were going to explain this and this is what they came up with.
What's to explain? Everyone already knows the pandemic impacted students.
I know! COVID especially impacted TJ students.
+1
The data from NMSF for TJ is an damning an indictment as you can get about the impact of changes to the TJ admission policies. The changes to TJ admissions were blatantly made to score political points.
The person who claims the TJ changes were to address test-buying has been caught in a dead lie. The person is just a racist low life and now we have data to prove that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last year, TJ had 35.3% of the VA NMSF. This year, they only have 20.6% of the VA NMSF.
It's a huge drop, no matter how people try to spin things. It should have been obvious to everyone that when you admit kids based on geographic diversity, essays, and experience factors rather than test scores, test scores will drop.
What are the FCPS percentages of VA semifinalists?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Last year, TJ had 35.3% of the VA NMSF. This year, they only have 20.6% of the VA NMSF.
It's a huge drop, no matter how people try to spin things. It should have been obvious to everyone that when you admit kids based on geographic diversity, essays, and experience factors rather than test scores, test scores will drop.
What are the FCPS percentages of VA semifinalists?
Anonymous wrote:Last year, TJ had 35.3% of the VA NMSF. This year, they only have 20.6% of the VA NMSF.
It's a huge drop, no matter how people try to spin things. It should have been obvious to everyone that when you admit kids based on geographic diversity, essays, and experience factors rather than test scores, test scores will drop.
Anonymous wrote:In 2022 and 2023, 67% and 63% of the NMSF in FCPS were from TJ. In 2024, only 42% of the NMSF in FCPS are from TJ, despite an increase in the number of TJ juniors from 440 to 500. I expect that next year, TJ’s performance will be even worse than this year, compared to other FCPS schools, because the only academic essay in TJ’s admission test for the class of 2026 was related to biology and was much easier than the math essay for the class of 2025.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lol at the fine tooth comb over something so obvious.
What's funny is that they had 4 years to figure out how they were going to explain this and this is what they came up with.
What's to explain? Everyone already knows the pandemic impacted students.
I know! COVID especially impacted TJ students.
+1
The data from NMSF for TJ is an damning an indictment as you can get about the impact of changes to the TJ admission policies. The changes to TJ admissions were blatantly made to score political points.
The person who claims the TJ changes were to address test-buying has been caught in a dead lie. The person is just a racist low life and now we have data to prove that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lol at the fine tooth comb over something so obvious.
What's funny is that they had 4 years to figure out how they were going to explain this and this is what they came up with.
What's to explain? Everyone already knows the pandemic impacted students.
I know! COVID especially impacted TJ students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lol at the fine tooth comb over something so obvious.
What's funny is that they had 4 years to figure out how they were going to explain this and this is what they came up with.
What's to explain? Everyone already knows the pandemic impacted students.