Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"These rankings don't matter" crowd sounds similar to the Test optional crowd that secretly pays $500/hr to test prep their kids to move from 1200 to 1250.
People, the only rankings that matter is US News and this is it for 2024!
With the biggest beneficiaries being the UCs, which are test blind.
+1. Zing to that annoying poster who won’t shut up about tutoring!
Does anyone really believe UCSB or Davis are T30?
The reality is that these lower UC schools are getting excellent students so maybe they really belong in T30.
And they educate them like cattle, and with the exception of UCLA, provide no housing.
Wait. UCLA has had serious housing issues. Google it
They did, but they built more.
Just this year! After screams from students and parents about obscene rents and no promise of guaranteed housing. It was a series in the LA Times! UCLA has been scrambling ever since
!! March 17, 2022 the LA Times blared “Housing crisis for 16,000 at UCLA”!
No one can build that fast. Especially in Westwood. Also UCLA is landlocked. What the regents did was to spend the taxpayers money and try to find hotels and existing apartments wherever they could and crab kids in them make promises that some sort of “housing” would be assured
Unless you link the actual article, I believe you are confusing it with Berkeley or UCSB. Both of these campuses have major housing issues. UCLA has guaranteed 4 years of housing for at least 5 years now. You maybe in a cramped place but you will have place to live.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"These rankings don't matter" crowd sounds similar to the Test optional crowd that secretly pays $500/hr to test prep their kids to move from 1200 to 1250.
People, the only rankings that matter is US News and this is it for 2024!
With the biggest beneficiaries being the UCs, which are test blind.
+1. Zing to that annoying poster who won’t shut up about tutoring!
Does anyone really believe UCSB or Davis are T30?
The reality is that these lower UC schools are getting excellent students so maybe they really belong in T30.
And they educate them like cattle, and with the exception of UCLA, provide no housing.
Wait. UCLA has had serious housing issues. Google it
They did, but they built more.
Just this year! After screams from students and parents about obscene rents and no promise of guaranteed housing. It was a series in the LA Times! UCLA has been scrambling ever since
!! March 17, 2022 the LA Times blared “Housing crisis for 16,000 at UCLA”!
No one can build that fast. Especially in Westwood. Also UCLA is landlocked. What the regents did was to spend the taxpayers money and try to find hotels and existing apartments wherever they could and crab kids in them make promises that some sort of “housing” would be assured
Unless you link the actual article, I believe you are confusing it with Berkeley or UCSB. Both of these campuses have major housing issues. UCLA has guaranteed 4 years of housing for at least 5 years now. You maybe in a cramped place but you will have place to live.
The article states 16,000 on housing waitlist across all UC and Cal State schools but UCLA only school to guarantee housing. Much different than what you are saying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"These rankings don't matter" crowd sounds similar to the Test optional crowd that secretly pays $500/hr to test prep their kids to move from 1200 to 1250.
People, the only rankings that matter is US News and this is it for 2024!
With the biggest beneficiaries being the UCs, which are test blind.
+1. Zing to that annoying poster who won’t shut up about tutoring!
Does anyone really believe UCSB or Davis are T30?
The reality is that these lower UC schools are getting excellent students so maybe they really belong in T30.
And they educate them like cattle, and with the exception of UCLA, provide no housing.
Wait. UCLA has had serious housing issues. Google it
They did, but they built more.
Just this year! After screams from students and parents about obscene rents and no promise of guaranteed housing. It was a series in the LA Times! UCLA has been scrambling ever since
!! March 17, 2022 the LA Times blared “Housing crisis for 16,000 at UCLA”!
No one can build that fast. Especially in Westwood. Also UCLA is landlocked. What the regents did was to spend the taxpayers money and try to find hotels and existing apartments wherever they could and crab kids in them make promises that some sort of “housing” would be assured
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:rankings have jumped the shark. UCs are disgustingly overrated with their low compared to peers 4 year graduation rates and lackluster class sizes/“experience”. Their yield despite in state discounts speak to this.
They have excellent 6 year graduation rates, though. Not everything in life is a race.
Anonymous wrote:rankings have jumped the shark. UCs are disgustingly overrated with their low compared to peers 4 year graduation rates and lackluster class sizes/“experience”. Their yield despite in state discounts speak to this.
Anonymous wrote:Northeastern drop from 44 to 53. Whoops.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am very nervous for WashU next year. Not looking good for them. Looking at the metrics there's not much they can improve on except social mobility and reputation scores. The harderst metrics to move.
WashU is in the top 25! Emory and CMU are not shabby peers. I don't see it as being below any arbitrary cutoff for great schools.
WashU doesn't have a brand like CMU does, and it's not in a great city like Emory, it NEEDS a higher ranking moreso than the other 2.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am very nervous for WashU next year. Not looking good for them. Looking at the metrics there's not much they can improve on except social mobility and reputation scores. The harderst metrics to move.
WashU is in the top 25! Emory and CMU are not shabby peers. I don't see it as being below any arbitrary cutoff for great schools.
I know but is the Bleeding over if you fall 9 spots in 1 year?
All the moves by individual schools mean nothing thus year. US News got rid of the criteria I actually thought was important— class size, highest degree held by faculty, alumni engagement, class rank of incoming students (and decreased importanceof test scores). I guess it’s only fitting that the ratings now are solidly based on criteria other than objective measures of academic quality, mirroring the path admissions themselves has taken in the past few years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am very nervous for WashU next year. Not looking good for them. Looking at the metrics there's not much they can improve on except social mobility and reputation scores. The harderst metrics to move.
WashU is in the top 25! Emory and CMU are not shabby peers. I don't see it as being below any arbitrary cutoff for great schools.