Are they or are they coaching them to win now? Because winning now is so important bwuhahaha

Anonymous wrote:It’s crazy how fixated on winning the parents on this thread are.

Serious question, are all these top girls team playing good soccer? Possession based, technical soccer? Like how the Spanish and French women’s team play? Or do they emulate the us women’s team? Are the girls able to move the ball around under pressure or are they booting the ball away at any sign of pressure?

You mean actually teach a style that can work internationally? These leagues are preparing kids for college soccer. College soccer is not international soccer.

It’s crazy how fixated on winning the parents on this thread are.

Serious question, are all these top girls team playing good soccer? Possession based, technical soccer? Like how the Spanish and French women’s team play? Or do they emulate the us women’s team? Are the girls able to move the ball around under pressure or are they booting the ball away at any sign of pressure?

They’re 12 years old…

There are a good amount of talent filled 2011G teams in the area. Union is definitely in the mix. I don’t see them beating BSC or Arlington currently though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like previously mentioned, unless you’re talking about Arlington, BSC, or Union, the rest of the clubs can all be tossed into same hat of not knowing where they’ll be at the end of the season.

The rest are teams still figuring themselves out, while those three have been consistent for a number of years.

I would take Union off that list. BSC and Arlington are tops in the area.

VA Union beat CSA. Arlington lost to CSA. Is Arlington going to allow Union back on that list? Or no?

The same Union team that lost to Beach and Richmond by a combined score of 0-8?

Yes. I believe there is only one Union team so it would be the same Union team that put up 4 goals & won against a team that Arlington couldn’t put up any goals against this morning & lost.

That Union team. Interesting if true that their Centerback didn’t play. Guess they’re just an average / mediocre team without her. Let’s hope for their sanity that she doesn’t ever have to move away from @ Arlington or else the mediocre team that they would be would have parents in a frenzy jumping from club to club.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like previously mentioned, unless you’re talking about Arlington, BSC, or Union, the rest of the clubs can all be tossed into same hat of not knowing where they’ll be at the end of the season.

The rest are teams still figuring themselves out, while those three have been consistent for a number of years.

I would take Union off that list. BSC and Arlington are tops in the area.

VA Union beat CSA. Arlington lost to CSA. Is Arlington going to allow Union back on that list? Or no?

The same Union team that lost to Beach and Richmond by a combined score of 0-8?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like previously mentioned, unless you’re talking about Arlington, BSC, or Union, the rest of the clubs can all be tossed into same hat of not knowing where they’ll be at the end of the season.

The rest are teams still figuring themselves out, while those three have been consistent for a number of years.

I would take Union off that list. BSC and Arlington are tops in the area.

VA Union beat CSA. Arlington lost to CSA. Is Arlington going to allow Union back on that list? Or no?

Was that from this morning? Union isn’t consistent by any means. Arlington 2011’s are about as consistent as you’ll find in this area. Could this be the beginning of them coming back to earth? Maybe. But until any other group can be as consistent on the pitch as they are, they still are tops in the immediate area since no other group has contended with them.

I thought, per this thread, that Arlington was just going to play in the next women's World Cup on behalf of the US. Is that no longer true?

Word is their center back (best player on their team) didn’t play. That will be their excuse as to why they got scored on.

Hopefully the Arlington Parents’ Netflix deal for the best youth soccer team of all time works out with the traumatizing u13 loss.

The parents from that team could have a show all on their own.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like previously mentioned, unless you’re talking about Arlington, BSC, or Union, the rest of the clubs can all be tossed into same hat of not knowing where they’ll be at the end of the season.

The rest are teams still figuring themselves out, while those three have been consistent for a number of years.

I would take Union off that list. BSC and Arlington are tops in the area.

VA Union beat CSA. Arlington lost to CSA. Is Arlington going to allow Union back on that list? Or no?

Was that from this morning? Union isn’t consistent by any means. Arlington 2011’s are about as consistent as you’ll find in this area. Could this be the beginning of them coming back to earth? Maybe. But until any other group can be as consistent on the pitch as they are, they still are tops in the immediate area since no other group has contended with them.

I thought, per this thread, that Arlington was just going to play in the next women's World Cup on behalf of the US. Is that no longer true?

Word is their center back (best player on their team) didn’t play. That will be their excuse as to why they got scored on.

Hopefully the Arlington Parents’ Netflix deal for the best youth soccer team of all time works out with the traumatizing u13 loss.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like previously mentioned, unless you’re talking about Arlington, BSC, or Union, the rest of the clubs can all be tossed into same hat of not knowing where they’ll be at the end of the season.

The rest are teams still figuring themselves out, while those three have been consistent for a number of years.

I would take Union off that list. BSC and Arlington are tops in the area.

VA Union beat CSA. Arlington lost to CSA. Is Arlington going to allow Union back on that list? Or no?

Was that from this morning? Union isn’t consistent by any means. Arlington 2011’s are about as consistent as you’ll find in this area. Could this be the beginning of them coming back to earth? Maybe. But until any other group can be as consistent on the pitch as they are, they still are tops in the immediate area since no other group has contended with them.

I thought, per this thread, that Arlington was just going to play in the next women's World Cup on behalf of the US. Is that no longer true?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like previously mentioned, unless you’re talking about Arlington, BSC, or Union, the rest of the clubs can all be tossed into same hat of not knowing where they’ll be at the end of the season.

The rest are teams still figuring themselves out, while those three have been consistent for a number of years.

I would take Union off that list. BSC and Arlington are tops in the area.

VA Union beat CSA. Arlington lost to CSA. Is Arlington going to allow Union back on that list? Or no?

Was that from this morning? Union isn’t consistent by any means. Arlington 2011’s are about as consistent as you’ll find in this area. Could this be the beginning of them coming back to earth? Maybe. But until any other group can be as consistent on the pitch as they are, they still are tops in the immediate area since no other group has contended with them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like previously mentioned, unless you’re talking about Arlington, BSC, or Union, the rest of the clubs can all be tossed into same hat of not knowing where they’ll be at the end of the season.

The rest are teams still figuring themselves out, while those three have been consistent for a number of years.

I would take Union off that list. BSC and Arlington are tops in the area.

VA Union beat CSA. Arlington lost to CSA. Is Arlington going to allow Union back on that list? Or no?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Union beat BSC. Probably they r inconsistent with all the new kids and still need to figure stuff out

Or they got lucky against Bethesda?

Yeah, that's prolly it. A lucky 2 goal difference.

“Prolly” an off day for BSC.

Or maybe the coach is actually interested in developing all his players and giving them all playing time, not just keeping the same starting squad on the field. For all the talk about development on this board, people question 12-year old game scores as if it's the USWNT. Gimme a break. This thread absolutely needs to die. Let the kids play, let them develop. Stop the pissing contest for U13s.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Union beat BSC. Probably they r inconsistent with all the new kids and still need to figure stuff out

Or they got lucky against Bethesda?

Yeah, that's prolly it. A lucky 2 goal difference.

“Prolly” an off day for BSC.

Probably both of things since they're 12 and still figuring it out.

Can this thread just die?

I think it died a long time ago - just one parent of a U13 making his kid a hero

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Union beat BSC. Probably they r inconsistent with all the new kids and still need to figure stuff out

Or they got lucky against Bethesda?

Yeah, that's prolly it. A lucky 2 goal difference.

“Prolly” an off day for BSC.

Probably both of things since they're 12 and still figuring it out.

Can this thread just die?