Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

People also thought it was hilarious when Tiger Woods locked his live-in girlfriend of six years out of his mansion and refused to give her a cent because she signed an NDA and agreement when they first started dating.

Why would he give a girlfriend money after a break up? That would be ridiculous. I can't imagine the gall to even ask for it! Hopefully she was dating him because she loved him and not for his money. Likely why the NDA and agreement was in place - although I am sure she still benefited greatly during the 6 years together and likely did not pull her own weight financially. It must be near impossible for the ultra rich / famous to find someone who isn't mostly after their lifestyle and money. I wouldn't expect any man or woman to give an ex boyfriend or ex-girlfriend money when they break up.

Even for the ultra rich with kids I think there should be a cap for child support - something like 25k a month. And alimony in the ultra rich rarely makes sense as they have housefuls of nannies and drivers and house managers and landscapers and cleaning services and chefs etc. There is no need for a woman to give up her career in those families.

A "contract is a contract" for Tiger Woods and his six year live-in girlfriend, whom he made quit her career. She can't even talk because of the NDA. But who cares, a contract is a contract, right?

But a "contract is NOT a contract" for Costner and his ex-wife? It's not like Costner is denying child support. He's paying for everything plus six-figures a month in child support.

Anonymous wrote:My view: he should buy her a house in his neighborhood so kids can easily go to/from each parent’s home. He should cover kids’ education expenses and set up a trust for them. Then give the ex-wife a flat number, say $20M for the rest of her life.

Eliminate the monthly alimony.

His wife should really talk with Rupert Murdoch’s ex-wife, who got her kids first in line for inheritance. I guarantee Costner will have more kids because he doesn’t wear rubbers, he’s sleazy like that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

People also thought it was hilarious when Tiger Woods locked his live-in girlfriend of six years out of his mansion and refused to give her a cent because she signed an NDA and agreement when they first started dating.

Why would he give a girlfriend money after a break up? That would be ridiculous. I can't imagine the gall to even ask for it! Hopefully she was dating him because she loved him and not for his money. Likely why the NDA and agreement was in place - although I am sure she still benefited greatly during the 6 years together and likely did not pull her own weight financially. It must be near impossible for the ultra rich / famous to find someone who isn't mostly after their lifestyle and money. I wouldn't expect any man or woman to give an ex boyfriend or ex-girlfriend money when they break up.

Even for the ultra rich with kids I think there should be a cap for child support - something like 25k a month. And alimony in the ultra rich rarely makes sense as they have housefuls of nannies and drivers and house managers and landscapers and cleaning services and chefs etc. There is no need for a woman to give up her career in those families.

Anonymous wrote:My view: he should buy her a house in his neighborhood so kids can easily go to/from each parent’s home. He should cover kids’ education expenses and set up a trust for them. Then give the ex-wife a flat number, say $20M for the rest of her life.

Eliminate the monthly alimony.

His wife should really talk with Rupert Murdoch’s ex-wife, who got her kids first in line for inheritance. I guarantee Costner will have more kids because he doesn’t wear rubbers, he’s sleazy like that.

Anonymous wrote:My view: he should buy her a house in his neighborhood so kids can easily go to/from each parent’s home. He should cover kids’ education expenses and set up a trust for them. Then give the ex-wife a flat number, say $20M for the rest of her life.

Eliminate the monthly alimony.

His wife should really talk with Rupert Murdoch’s ex-wife, who got her kids first in line for inheritance. I guarantee Costner will have more kids because he doesn’t wear rubbers, he’s sleazy like that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am also on KCs side regarding the divorce / financial agreement.

Asking for almost 300k a month in child support is insane.

People had a meltdown when Kevin Federline asked for 25k a month. This is more than ten times that. It is nonsense.

People also thought it was hilarious when Tiger Woods locked his live-in girlfriend of six years out of his mansion and refused to give her a cent because she signed an NDA and agreement when they first started dating.

Anonymous wrote:My view: he should buy her a house in his neighborhood so kids can easily go to/from each parent’s home. He should cover kids’ education expenses and set up a trust for them. Then give the ex-wife a flat number, say $20M for the rest of her life.

Eliminate the monthly alimony.

His wife should really talk with Rupert Murdoch’s ex-wife, who got her kids first in line for inheritance. I guarantee Costner will have more kids because he doesn’t wear rubbers, he’s sleazy like that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like she had a bad lawyer, or no lawyer, when she was negotiating the prenup 20 years ago. After 20 years, with his net worth, and his lifestyle needed to travel a lot, she should be getting more than that. The prenup should’ve been on more of a vesting schedule where she got more depending on how long they were married.

It’s so stupid when rich famous men try to screw their wives this way. It’s much smarter to give them enough money and perhaps an agreement not to malign in press or do a book deal

NP. Nobody cares. I’m sorry, but all the hysterics in this thread claiming that KC will lose fans are delusional. First, if they even know about it, there will be a lot of people who look at the situation and say, she was 30, she had a lawyer herself, and she signed a contract, too bad. Second, nobody cares what male celebrities do. Tom Cruise is hugely popular, for instance.

This thread seems to be populated by women who have a meager understanding of California pre-nup litigation. She could challenge but she is probably going to lose.

I don’t really understand all the takes in this thread that seem totally untethered to reality.

For someone who claims not to care, you post a lot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like she had a bad lawyer, or no lawyer, when she was negotiating the prenup 20 years ago. After 20 years, with his net worth, and his lifestyle needed to travel a lot, she should be getting more than that. The prenup should’ve been on more of a vesting schedule where she got more depending on how long they were married.

It’s so stupid when rich famous men try to screw their wives this way. It’s much smarter to give them enough money and perhaps an agreement not to malign in press or do a book deal

NP. Nobody cares. I’m sorry, but all the hysterics in this thread claiming that KC will lose fans are delusional. First, if they even know about it, there will be a lot of people who look at the situation and say, she was 30, she had a lawyer herself, and she signed a contract, too bad. Second, nobody cares what male celebrities do. Tom Cruise is hugely popular, for instance.

This thread seems to be populated by women who have a meager understanding of California pre-nup litigation. She could challenge but she is probably going to lose.

I don’t really understand all the takes in this thread that seem totally untethered to reality.

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for the kids to be in the middle of this. I hope he makes an effort to spend time with them now that he no longer lives with their mother.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are capable competent beings who can make their own money. She should stick to the prenup she agreed to and anything she wants beyond that, she can earn herself.

He should have stayed unmarried instead of bringing three more children into the world that he didn't want to spend time parenting.

Anonymous wrote:Women are capable competent beings who can make their own money. She should stick to the prenup she agreed to and anything she wants beyond that, she can earn herself.