Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And if they stick to this message, they will win. The GOP has NO answer to this. Reagan did. Bush 41 did. W sort of did, but no longer.

I like how this kind of turns the whole freedom message around on the Republicans. They claim to be for freedom but their actions amount to suppressing freedom for people who don’t agree with them.

I think Republicans are going to try to make the trans stuff a big issue to try to sway male independent voters. I hope men don’t fall for it. That should be very far from the top of our concerns as a country. Democrats need to stop making it a big thing too. Be supportive but don’t put it front and center. It’s not a winning issue.

It's tough to claim you are for "freedom" when you are the administration that forced vaccines on workers in order to keep their jobs and have worked really hard to suppress speech in so many ways, not to mention attacking the freedom of religion.

Freedom of speech you say

But srsly, bud - these things you mention, sort of have gone out the door since Rs took away abortion, not to mention all the other stuff. Yeah, COVID policies - that was three years ago now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And if they stick to this message, they will win. The GOP has NO answer to this. Reagan did. Bush 41 did. W sort of did, but no longer.

I like how this kind of turns the whole freedom message around on the Republicans. They claim to be for freedom but their actions amount to suppressing freedom for people who don’t agree with them.

I think Republicans are going to try to make the trans stuff a big issue to try to sway male independent voters. I hope men don’t fall for it. That should be very far from the top of our concerns as a country. Democrats need to stop making it a big thing too. Be supportive but don’t put it front and center. It’s not a winning issue.

It's tough to claim you are for "freedom" when you are the administration that forced vaccines on workers in order to keep their jobs and have worked really hard to suppress speech in so many ways, not to mention attacking the freedom of religion.

Freedom of speech you say

But srsly, bud - these things you mention, sort of have gone out the door since Rs took away abortion, not to mention all the other stuff. Yeah, COVID policies - that was three years ago now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And if they stick to this message, they will win. The GOP has NO answer to this. Reagan did. Bush 41 did. W sort of did, but no longer.

I like how this kind of turns the whole freedom message around on the Republicans. They claim to be for freedom but their actions amount to suppressing freedom for people who don’t agree with them.

I think Republicans are going to try to make the trans stuff a big issue to try to sway male independent voters. I hope men don’t fall for it. That should be very far from the top of our concerns as a country. Democrats need to stop making it a big thing too. Be supportive but don’t put it front and center. It’s not a winning issue.

It's tough to claim you are for "freedom" when you are the administration that forced vaccines on workers in order to keep their jobs and have worked really hard to suppress speech in so many ways, not to mention attacking the freedom of religion.

No one was forced- they could do testing or they could find another job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who else would run for the Ds at this point?

Whitmer, Newsom, Buttigieg

Yes. Or…..

Jon Ossoff
Raphael Warnock
Lauren Underwood
Joe Nguse

There are others.

Dems have a deep bench. People who ask dumb questions like the first PPs don’t even bother to look at options. Lazy AF.

Ossoff and Warnock have been senators for five minutes. They are part of a deep bench? Nah.

Lol, unlike a young Senator Barack Obama who had also been senator for five minutes and then got zero momentum and did terribly when he ran for president.

Democrats have the most annoying habit of looking for reasons they aBsOluTeLy cAnNoT vote for this person or that person. Democrats are always looking for this magical, perfect person who appeals to absolutely everyone, never missteps, has the perfect amount of domestic and international experience, looks attractive enough, has a pristine dating history, has no annoying quirks, and is the correct race and gender.

If many democrat voters stop this buffoonery, they’ll see that we have lots of amazing candidates who aren’t even 80 years old. 😲😲

You must be young. The only thing that matters is that Biden can beat trump in the swing states. There is no point in a candidate that cannot do that

I’m 48. There are other people who can beat Trump; 80-year-old Joe isn’t the second coming.

You sound old and stuck in the past.

Trump lost to Biden. This is a do over. What fool would mess with success.

And Joe against someone who is not 70….? You think Joe’s going to look good against a fresh, quick-thinking candidate?

Who is that fresh, quick-thinking candidate you have in mind?

This guy, who's so charismatic and good on his feet - the one who just banned abortion in Florida?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And if they stick to this message, they will win. The GOP has NO answer to this. Reagan did. Bush 41 did. W sort of did, but no longer.

I like how this kind of turns the whole freedom message around on the Republicans. They claim to be for freedom but their actions amount to suppressing freedom for people who don’t agree with them.

I think Republicans are going to try to make the trans stuff a big issue to try to sway male independent voters. I hope men don’t fall for it. That should be very far from the top of our concerns as a country. Democrats need to stop making it a big thing too. Be supportive but don’t put it front and center. It’s not a winning issue.

It's tough to claim you are for "freedom" when you are the administration that forced vaccines on workers in order to keep their jobs and have worked really hard to suppress speech in so many ways, not to mention attacking the freedom of religion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry! Here’s the hotlink:

Ossoff is proof that being a senator is a great job for someone who has never worked anywhere else before

Ossoff worked in the Hill for years and then ran a documentary production company for many more years.

Exactly. He never held a real job before being elected the Senate!

Having run a production company myself, it requires sales, marketing, accounting and other management skills, as well as the creative, overseeing scripts, shooting days, edit days, graphics, music, licensing...you have NO idea what the job entails.

First, you start with a trust fund…

Anonymous wrote:$100 for everyone who uses the word woke and can also give me an actual definition

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And if they stick to this message, they will win. The GOP has NO answer to this. Reagan did. Bush 41 did. W sort of did, but no longer.

I like how this kind of turns the whole freedom message around on the Republicans. They claim to be for freedom but their actions amount to suppressing freedom for people who don’t agree with them.

I think Republicans are going to try to make the trans stuff a big issue to try to sway male independent voters. I hope men don’t fall for it. That should be very far from the top of our concerns as a country. Democrats need to stop making it a big thing too. Be supportive but don’t put it front and center. It’s not a winning issue.

It's tough to claim you are for "freedom" when you are the administration that forced vaccines on workers in order to keep their jobs and have worked really hard to suppress speech in so many ways, not to mention attacking the freedom of religion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

And if they stick to this message, they will win. The GOP has NO answer to this. Reagan did. Bush 41 did. W sort of did, but no longer.

I like how this kind of turns the whole freedom message around on the Republicans. They claim to be for freedom but their actions amount to suppressing freedom for people who don’t agree with them.

I think Republicans are going to try to make the trans stuff a big issue to try to sway male independent voters. I hope men don’t fall for it. That should be very far from the top of our concerns as a country. Democrats need to stop making it a big thing too. Be supportive but don’t put it front and center. It’s not a winning issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry! Here’s the hotlink:

Ossoff is proof that being a senator is a great job for someone who has never worked anywhere else before

Ossoff worked in the Hill for years and then ran a documentary production company for many more years.

Exactly. He never held a real job before being elected the Senate!

Having run a production company myself, it requires sales, marketing, accounting and other management skills, as well as the creative, overseeing scripts, shooting days, edit days, graphics, music, licensing...you have NO idea what the job entails.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry! Here’s the hotlink:

Ossoff is proof that being a senator is a great job for someone who has never worked anywhere else before

Ossoff worked in the Hill for years and then ran a documentary production company for many more years.

Exactly. He never held a real job before being elected the Senate!

Anonymous wrote:Is Biden aware of this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry! Here’s the hotlink:

Ossoff is proof that being a senator is a great job for someone who has never worked anywhere else before

Ossoff worked in the Hill for years and then ran a documentary production company for many more years.

Exactly. He never held a real job before being elected the Senate!