Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Season 2 is great. I LOVE that Keri looks like a typical civil servant. She’s intelligent, witty, and knows how to work the system. She looks showered. Her hair isn’t coiffed. I’m so sick of the female newscaster look.
This is intentional ... I'm assuming you are behind a bit?
Huh? Plenty of government employees look like her. It would be weird if she was dolled up. It would distract from her background and persona. I don’t get why people are outraged by her appearance.
Anonymous wrote:I cancelled Netflix during a lull in watching anything. Is season two worth renewing to watch?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Season 2 is great. I LOVE that Keri looks like a typical civil servant. She’s intelligent, witty, and knows how to work the system. She looks showered. Her hair isn’t coiffed. I’m so sick of the female newscaster look.
This is intentional ... I'm assuming you are behind a bit?
Anonymous wrote:Season 2 is great. I LOVE that Keri looks like a typical civil servant. She’s intelligent, witty, and knows how to work the system. She looks showered. Her hair isn’t coiffed. I’m so sick of the female newscaster look.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just started season 2. I think the problem with Hal and her is that they both are and want to be powerful independent people so they are in each others way but love keeps them tethered
I would say the conflict is desire for power [Hal] v responsibility to serve [Kate] and
Moral flexibility [Hal] v rigidity [Kate].
It’s not that Hal wants to do bad things, but he very much wants to be the one doing the good things, and he’s much more open to the ends justifying the means. Meanwhile, Kate may find the prospect of serving as VP somewhat enticing, but she’d really be just as happy contributing to the greater good in whatever capacity flows to her.
I agree with you PP. Good analysis. I don’t understand how she can trust him. Or maybe she is just trying to contain him by staying married? It’s gotta be exhausting
Anonymous wrote:I don't get how people liked the second season. It felt bureaucratic and wordy without saying much. Plot felt boring yet convoluted and fake. I love spy shows like Homeland, The Americans. This just was nowhere near as good.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone watching?
Rufus is a gem!
I love Keri Russell, but I’m not loving this character. She speaks too fast, is too harsh, and the only emotions this character seems to have make her seem weak and weird (the whole anti-dress and anti-social thing are weird for a diplomat).
And while I loved her wardrobe and hair in both the Americans and Felicity, I don’t get her look in this series at all—especially since her husband is all dolled up.
I love the London setting and the plot. I hope it gets better.
Anonymous wrote:I cancelled Netflix during a lull in watching anything. Is season two worth renewing to watch?
Anonymous wrote:
5. You know a show is way too complicated when you can’t remember any of the names of the characters. And I can’t follow what the PM has done—or allegedly done. It’s a mess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just started season 2. I think the problem with Hal and her is that they both are and want to be powerful independent people so they are in each others way but love keeps them tethered
I would say the conflict is desire for power [Hal] v responsibility to serve [Kate] and
Moral flexibility [Hal] v rigidity [Kate].
It’s not that Hal wants to do bad things, but he very much wants to be the one doing the good things, and he’s much more open to the ends justifying the means. Meanwhile, Kate may find the prospect of serving as VP somewhat enticing, but she’d really be just as happy contributing to the greater good in whatever capacity flows to her.