Anonymous wrote:Wow, that was quick, MAGA already has proclaimed the leaker a hero

Of course they would celebrate a traitor to America, because MAGAs are traitors to America.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've no idea what his motive was, but he should be punished in any case.

However, I am more disturbed that so many people have access to so much information.

This should go up the chain of command for negligence--beginning with whoever approved him for this clearance. How much training did this kid get on what would happen if he shared information? Did he get any training on the seriousness of his job?

We hear an awful lot about training on social issues, sexual issues, etc. How much training are these young people getting on the importance of their jobs.

Wow slow down there skippy! That is not how things work and why after Snowden(low level employee) we are seeing the same thing. There will be no comprehensive review as to why a low level employee has access to all the top secret files(many that are outside of his purview), can make copies, just take them home or post on the web(for months before anyone notices).

DO NOT LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN….you will be arrested! So next times this happens do not ask these type of questions

There is potential that this guy is just being made the fall guy for much higher ups.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the times

Later, someone who appeared to be Airman Teixeira drove onto the property in a red pickup truck.

When Times reporters approached the house again, the truck was parked in the driveway. Airman Teixeira’s mother and a man were standing outside in the driveway.

When asked if Airman Teixeira was there and willing to speak, the man said: “He needs to get an attorney if things are flowing the way they are going right now. The Feds will be around soon, I’m sure.”

The NYT found this guy before the feds did? Wonder if FBI agents refused to investigate the case?

And what does that tell you instinctively?

I'm hoping that the FBI hadn't moved on the guy yet because they'd had him under surveillance???? They aren't really as incompetent as this NYT story make them appear, right??? Right???

I just watched the Boston Bombing doc on Netflix. The FBI had images of the suspects fairly quickly and were determining the identity when someone leaked the images. I got the sense it was BPD, but idk. Anyways, the reason the FBI and DOJ didn't want to release them was b/c they didn't want to alert the bombers that they were on to them. Ultimately, FBI had to get out ahead of the leak, and then there was a lot of death and destruction that followed when they tried to escape. Not to mention the bombers' friends trying to destroy evidence once they recognized who it was.

Revealing that the government has been lying about its involvement in Ukraine? Sounds like whistleblowing.

Where's the big lie?

We've been transparent on equipment being transferred. As for other "involvement" the leak said there were 50 US soldiers in Ukraine. 50. Whoopie doo. Four dozen. Like we're supposed to believe that 50 American soldiers are going to take on 200,000 Russian soldiers? The role of those Americans is no doubt to observe, advise and provide training where needed, pretty standard kind of stuff.

That's a FAR cry from the stupid and ridiculous lies your Russian friends have been telling, that they are "fighting NATO troops" and claims that there were no Ukrainian troops at the front, all black GIs from America and other horsecrap.

You say lie? That's pretty ridiculous.

Anonymous wrote:Well, Biden said he is not worried about the content of the leak, so all is ok. NBD.

He had to say that.

So, he's anti-war, yet he's in the armed forces?

Well, Biden said he is not worried about the content of the leak, so all is ok. NBD.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

He’s like a low-rent Snowden. Except he wasn’t making that big contractor money.

What’s shocking is that flags were not auto-triggered when an IT tech in the national guard was accessing & printing these files. The content in these documents have nothing to do with his job. And why do SCIFs have printers?!? That’s gotta go too.

No. Snowden was a whistleblower. This guy is a cult leader. Very different aspirations and ethics.

Snowden was not a whistleblower. Whisitleblowers do not work with enemies of the state like Assange and then end up under the protectorate of Moscow.

Assange is not an enemy of the state. It's actually pretty brazen he's being tried at all.

Your data is out of date. Dude is not a white knight.

And he doesn’t have to be.

Trump and Marge aren't on point here. I am sure this will change shortly.

Wow, that was quick, MAGA already has proclaimed the leaker a hero

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I've no idea what his motive was, but he should be punished in any case.

However, I am more disturbed that so many people have access to so much information.

This should go up the chain of command for negligence--beginning with whoever approved him for this clearance. How much training did this kid get on what would happen if he shared information? Did he get any training on the seriousness of his job?

We hear an awful lot about training on social issues, sexual issues, etc. How much training are these young people getting on the importance of their jobs.

The clearance process is complicated enough. This guy should never have had access to what he did. No 21 year-old part-time junior airman should have had access to information that reveals sigint on the UN SG or Heads of State. By all means his boss and CoC should be looked at but the underlying problem is that way too much was available to way too many. Which is ironic because usually it's overclassification that's the problem.

He's been leakimg since he was 18. And giving people that age access is the way its always been.

Anonymous wrote:I've no idea what his motive was, but he should be punished in any case.

However, I am more disturbed that so many people have access to so much information.

This should go up the chain of command for negligence--beginning with whoever approved him for this clearance. How much training did this kid get on what would happen if he shared information? Did he get any training on the seriousness of his job?

We hear an awful lot about training on social issues, sexual issues, etc. How much training are these young people getting on the importance of their jobs.

Wow slow down there skippy! That is not how things work and why after Snowden(low level employee) we are seeing the same thing. There will be no comprehensive review as to why a low level employee has access to all the top secret files(many that are outside of his purview), can make copies, just take them home or post on the web(for months before anyone notices).

DO NOT LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN….you will be arrested! So next times this happens do not ask these type of questions

Anonymous wrote:I've no idea what his motive was, but he should be punished in any case.

However, I am more disturbed that so many people have access to so much information.

This should go up the chain of command for negligence--beginning with whoever approved him for this clearance. How much training did this kid get on what would happen if he shared information? Did he get any training on the seriousness of his job?

We hear an awful lot about training on social issues, sexual issues, etc. How much training are these young people getting on the importance of their jobs.

The clearance process is complicated enough. This guy should never have had access to what he did. No 21 year-old part-time junior airman should have had access to information that reveals sigint on the UN SG or Heads of State. By all means his boss and CoC should be looked at but the underlying problem is that way too much was available to way too many. Which is ironic because usually it's overclassification that's the problem.

Anonymous wrote:I've no idea what his motive was, but he should be punished in any case.

However, I am more disturbed that so many people have access to so much information.

This should go up the chain of command for negligence--beginning with whoever approved him for this clearance. How much training did this kid get on what would happen if he shared information? Did he get any training on the seriousness of his job?

We hear an awful lot about training on social issues, sexual issues, etc. How much training are these young people getting on the importance of their jobs.

They get a ton of training on handling classified documents.

Anonymous wrote:I've no idea what his motive was, but he should be punished in any case.

However, I am more disturbed that so many people have access to so much information.

This should go up the chain of command for negligence--beginning with whoever approved him for this clearance. How much training did this kid get on what would happen if he shared information? Did he get any training on the seriousness of his job?

We hear an awful lot about training on social issues, sexual issues, etc. How much training are these young people getting on the importance of their jobs.

Reality Winner got 5 years for one paper. Anyone who breathes knows you don't share that. But agree, how was he getting access unless he had clearance?

I've no idea what his motive was, but he should be punished in any case.

However, I am more disturbed that so many people have access to so much information.

This should go up the chain of command for negligence--beginning with whoever approved him for this clearance. How much training did this kid get on what would happen if he shared information? Did he get any training on the seriousness of his job?

We hear an awful lot about training on social issues, sexual issues, etc. How much training are these young people getting on the importance of their jobs.