Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe people are bashing a guy who served for 24 years over a small technicality. Ffs.
Seriously, move on. This is all you've got? They're grasping at straws
People who are grasping at straws are now talking about eyeliner and sex with the sofa. That is a clear indication that the person must have a spotless record.
I personally don't care if he wears a face full of makeup and has sex with his couch all day. I would rather talk about Vance's despicable statements on domestic violence, his desire to force victims of rape and incest to carry their rapist's child, and his distaste of providing safe and dependable childcare to children he wants to force women to have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe people are bashing a guy who served for 24 years over a small technicality. Ffs.
Seriously, move on. This is all you've got? They're grasping at straws
People who are grasping at straws are now talking about eyeliner and sex with the sofa. That is a clear indication that the person must have a spotless record.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe people are bashing a guy who served for 24 years over a small technicality. Ffs.
Seriously, move on. This is all you've got? They're grasping at straws
People who are grasping at straws are now talking about eyeliner and sex with the sofa. That is a clear indication that the person must have a spotless record.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe people are bashing a guy who served for 24 years over a small technicality. Ffs.
Seriously, move on. This is all you've got? They're grasping at straws
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I genuinely love this man. I think Walz can use his former teacher/coach skills to bring unity, empathy and common sense to our country and our political conversations with our neighbors.
yeah I love him too. what a terrific human and great leader!
+1. I've become a Tim Walz stan!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since the riots, the total number of police in the state of Minnesota are down by 40%.
Crime in Minnesota is up by 30% over the same time period.
This all happened under Tim’s watch.
Trump was very complimentary about Walz response to “the riots”.
Are you saying Trump is wrong? Bad judge of character?
Anonymous wrote:Since the riots, the total number of police in the state of Minnesota are down by 40%.
Crime in Minnesota is up by 30% over the same time period.
This all happened under Tim’s watch.
Anonymous wrote:Since the riots, the total number of police in the state of Minnesota are down by 40%.
Crime in Minnesota is up by 30% over the same time period.
This all happened under Tim’s watch.
Anonymous wrote:Since the riots, the total number of police in the state of Minnesota are down by 40%.
Crime in Minnesota is up by 30% over the same time period.
This all happened under Tim’s watch.
Anonymous wrote:Walz has been through both congressional and gubinitorial campaigns with media scrutiny over this issue.
It is all well documented and the public won't let a few partisan hacks and angry former service members derail the narrative.
The documentation confirm Walz version of events. He served. He retired. He came back, he got a promotion, he retired again before finishing the coursework for said promotion.
He still attained the rank even if he didn't formally retire with it.
He retired after 24 years of service. He gave 4 additional years after 9/11 and retired before his troop received orders to go abroad.
Period.
If that is the swiftboating the right wants to push in the context of a presidential nominee who faked his way out of service to the country in Vietnam, then so be it.
In the meantime, the right will simply be showing the country that it belittles the service of every nationalguardsman and every service member who didn't go abroad in their service.
It isn't like Vance saw combat, he was a desk jockey. That doesn't make his service less, but neither were combat veterans, so who cares?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Walz has been through both congressional and gubinitorial campaigns with media scrutiny over this issue.
It is all well documented and the public won't let a few partisan hacks and angry former service members derail the narrative.
The documentation confirm Walz version of events. He served. He retired. He came back, he got a promotion, he retired again before finishing the coursework for said promotion.
He still attained the rank even if he didn't formally retire with it.
He retired after 24 years of service. He gave 4 additional years after 9/11 and retired before his troop received orders to go abroad.
Period.
If that is the swiftboating the right wants to push in the context of a presidential nominee who faked his way out of service to the country in Vietnam, then so be it.
In the meantime, the right will simply be showing the country that it belittles the service of every nationalguardsman and every service member who didn't go abroad in their service.
It isn't like Vance saw combat, he was a desk jockey. That doesn't make his service less, but neither were combat veterans, so who cares?
This. All MAGA has is a reaction that bullies and insults. Do you REALLY want to compare lies of the candidates? REALLY?
We could come out and say "our guy isn't a convicted felon"
I'm going to say your candidate has no sound policies and didn't when he was POTUS. MExico will pay for the wall. yep, they sure did. Jesus.
What if you simply compared policy?