Anonymous wrote:How much deference do SB members get for their own areas? Are you all saying she could literally dictate to the consultants which neighborhoods in the Sully area were moved around?

Anonymous wrote:How much deference do SB members get for their own areas? Are you all saying she could literally dictate to the consultants which neighborhoods in the Sully area were moved around?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Seema Dixit thinks the Skyview purchase and subsequent rezoning was so great, then she needs to put her money where her mouth is and move her own neighborhood. If its just fine to move people around, volunteer yourself and your neighbors as tribute. Her area--the BRES split feeder-- was moved to WF on almost every prior map.

What's the big deal, right?

+1. Seema Dixit has done everything possible to enrich her own neighborhood and neighborhood school at the expense of everyone else. Reid and the other School Board members who haven't spoken up about this corruption are complicit.

I hope you at least got your tin foil hat on sale.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Seema Dixit thinks the Skyview purchase and subsequent rezoning was so great, then she needs to put her money where her mouth is and move her own neighborhood. If its just fine to move people around, volunteer yourself and your neighbors as tribute. Her area--the BRES split feeder-- was moved to WF on almost every prior map.

What's the big deal, right?

+1. Seema Dixit has done everything possible to enrich her own neighborhood and neighborhood school at the expense of everyone else. Reid and the other School Board members who haven't spoken up about this corruption are complicit.

I hope you at least got your tin foil hat on sale.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Seema Dixit thinks the Skyview purchase and subsequent rezoning was so great, then she needs to put her money where her mouth is and move her own neighborhood. If its just fine to move people around, volunteer yourself and your neighbors as tribute. Her area--the BRES split feeder-- was moved to WF on almost every prior map.

What's the big deal, right?

+1. Seema Dixit has done everything possible to enrich her own neighborhood and neighborhood school at the expense of everyone else. Reid and the other School Board members who haven't spoken up about this corruption are complicit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the other proposed maps in the other versions had Westfield with a more reasonable population-at least 23-400 students by pulling from Lees Corner, or Bull Run, or the Walney area, etc. This "final" map is the only one that dipped all the way down to @2000. I'm sure the Westfield people were taken aback by that.

Where were all the people thinking an enrollment of 2300 or 2400 kids is "reasonable" when FCPS was refusing to invest in other schools and downsizing them? If Westfield ends up with 2150 kids or so, it will still have an enrollment larger than nine other high schools, including Skyview.

The projection has it at only 2083, which is fewer than 2150, with the only MC neighborhood being rezoned lobbying FCPS hard to get out. There's no chance they add more kids in but based on the shenanigans so far, there's a likely chance they move kids back to Chantilly, which would leave them with 1900 or fewer.

You're right that the projection has Westfield at 2083, not 2150. That's still higher than nine other high schools based on all the boundary adjustments adopted and proposed: Herndon, Marshall, South County, Falls Church, Annandale, South Lakes, Mount Vernon, Skyview, and Lewis.

Interesting that this list of smallest schools also includes all the academic have-not schools people are desperate to avoid in FCPS and that FCPS ignores and refuses to improve. They are deliberately moving Westfield from a regular middle of the pack school down to the bottom tier of Avoid at All Cost schools.

If the only thing keeping Westfield in the middle of the pack was all those kids north of 50, then this was inevitable.

There is nothing special about those particular 1000+ kids. Moving back in a similar mix of 500-600 kids would keep Westfield afloat. FCPS is refusing to do that.

Wait til they cave to the Cub Run criers and moves them back to Chantilly at the last minute. That's how this process has been going down. Every time they put a map out, whatever middle class area got moved to Westfield tantrums and gets themselves moved back (except for the low income neighborhoods who are just being used as pawns at this point.)

Anonymous wrote:If Seema Dixit thinks the Skyview purchase and subsequent rezoning was so great, then she needs to put her money where her mouth is and move her own neighborhood. If its just fine to move people around, volunteer yourself and your neighbors as tribute. Her area--the BRES split feeder-- was moved to WF on almost every prior map.

What's the big deal, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:200+ rising 9th graders opted to Skyview from Westfields boundaries. So instead of 680 freshman Westfield will have 480 freshman. That’s where a lot of the destaffs came from. They will continue and get steeper the next few years with the redistricting plan. All Westfields young staff and many assistant coaches will be sent away.

Where did you get this number?

Yes. I did a search of this forum and found nothing from that post.

I live with someone who works at Westfield and is in the know. Westfield is terrified about the staff they will lose over the next couple of years. The young staff that will not be retained wear many hats in that building.

This is more than a year away. Teachers retire and move every year in a high school. This will not be a wholesale shift in staff. There will be natural attrition and a few always shift to other schools. Some move away.

They are already destaffing some teachers for this fall, that's two months away.

Since you are familiar with it, please name the departments.

They have 200+ kids disappearing from their freshman class.

Why do you doubt they are destaffing teachers who teach 9th grade courses? The principal gets a staffing budget based on enrollment. They can't keep the same number of teachers with 200 fewer freshmen. Maybe you don't understand how schools are run.

I understand enough to know that teachers leave every year due to moves, retirements, and transfers of choice. With a staff the size of Westfield, it should not be an issue. So, be specific please. Sure there will be fewer teachers, but, doubt many are being forced out. Do you think there won't be enough teachers? Not sure you understand how staffing works.

There will be enough teachers at Westfield but there will be fewer sections of some classes, because there are fewer students to enroll. Electives that were on the margin with the number of kids to take them might not have enough kids because some of the kids who would have enrolled are not at Westfield. 200 students is significant and will impact the staffing numbers.

People might be excited to be moving to Skyview from SLHS and Westfield, maybe even Chantilly, but there will be impacts at the schools because the numbers enrolling in classes will drop. It is leading to destaffing and I can understand why people are unhappy with that.

Once fully enrolled though Skyview will have less students than Westfield or about the same. Wouldn’t that mind both schools would have the same amount of teachers and similar academic offerings?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:200+ rising 9th graders opted to Skyview from Westfields boundaries. So instead of 680 freshman Westfield will have 480 freshman. That’s where a lot of the destaffs came from. They will continue and get steeper the next few years with the redistricting plan. All Westfields young staff and many assistant coaches will be sent away.

Where did you get this number?

Yes. I did a search of this forum and found nothing from that post.

I live with someone who works at Westfield and is in the know. Westfield is terrified about the staff they will lose over the next couple of years. The young staff that will not be retained wear many hats in that building.

This is more than a year away. Teachers retire and move every year in a high school. This will not be a wholesale shift in staff. There will be natural attrition and a few always shift to other schools. Some move away.

They are already destaffing some teachers for this fall, that's two months away.

There are always shifts in staff. If you really worked at a school you would know that.

You can’t be serious if you’re comparing normal staff attrition and transfers to what happens when you deliberately start shrinking a high school by 600 kids (and that number will be higher if some of the Chantilly families get their way and aren’t reassigned).

This is anything but business as usual, but you’re clearly so indifferent to what happens to Westfield that you’re pretending otherwise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:200+ rising 9th graders opted to Skyview from Westfields boundaries. So instead of 680 freshman Westfield will have 480 freshman. That’s where a lot of the destaffs came from. They will continue and get steeper the next few years with the redistricting plan. All Westfields young staff and many assistant coaches will be sent away.

Where did you get this number?

Yes. I did a search of this forum and found nothing from that post.

I live with someone who works at Westfield and is in the know. Westfield is terrified about the staff they will lose over the next couple of years. The young staff that will not be retained wear many hats in that building.

This is more than a year away. Teachers retire and move every year in a high school. This will not be a wholesale shift in staff. There will be natural attrition and a few always shift to other schools. Some move away.

They are already destaffing some teachers for this fall, that's two months away.

Since you are familiar with it, please name the departments.

They have 200+ kids disappearing from their freshman class.

Why do you doubt they are destaffing teachers who teach 9th grade courses? The principal gets a staffing budget based on enrollment. They can't keep the same number of teachers with 200 fewer freshmen. Maybe you don't understand how schools are run.

I understand enough to know that teachers leave every year due to moves, retirements, and transfers of choice. With a staff the size of Westfield, it should not be an issue. So, be specific please. Sure there will be fewer teachers, but, doubt many are being forced out. Do you think there won't be enough teachers? Not sure you understand how staffing works.

There will be enough teachers at Westfield but there will be fewer sections of some classes, because there are fewer students to enroll. Electives that were on the margin with the number of kids to take them might not have enough kids because some of the kids who would have enrolled are not at Westfield. 200 students is significant and will impact the staffing numbers.

People might be excited to be moving to Skyview from SLHS and Westfield, maybe even Chantilly, but there will be impacts at the schools because the numbers enrolling in classes will drop. It is leading to destaffing and I can understand why people are unhappy with that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the other proposed maps in the other versions had Westfield with a more reasonable population-at least 23-400 students by pulling from Lees Corner, or Bull Run, or the Walney area, etc. This "final" map is the only one that dipped all the way down to @2000. I'm sure the Westfield people were taken aback by that.

Where were all the people thinking an enrollment of 2300 or 2400 kids is "reasonable" when FCPS was refusing to invest in other schools and downsizing them? If Westfield ends up with 2150 kids or so, it will still have an enrollment larger than nine other high schools, including Skyview.

The projection has it at only 2083, which is fewer than 2150, with the only MC neighborhood being rezoned lobbying FCPS hard to get out. There's no chance they add more kids in but based on the shenanigans so far, there's a likely chance they move kids back to Chantilly, which would leave them with 1900 or fewer.

You're right that the projection has Westfield at 2083, not 2150. That's still higher than nine other high schools based on all the boundary adjustments adopted and proposed: Herndon, Marshall, South County, Falls Church, Annandale, South Lakes, Mount Vernon, Skyview, and Lewis.

Interesting that this list of smallest schools also includes all the academic have-not schools people are desperate to avoid in FCPS and that FCPS ignores and refuses to improve. They are deliberately moving Westfield from a regular middle of the pack school down to the bottom tier of Avoid at All Cost schools.

If the only thing keeping Westfield in the middle of the pack was all those kids north of 50, then this was inevitable.

There is nothing special about those particular 1000+ kids. Moving back in a similar mix of 500-600 kids would keep Westfield afloat. FCPS is refusing to do that.

Wait til they cave to the Cub Run criers and moves them back to Chantilly at the last minute. That's how this process has been going down. Every time they put a map out, whatever middle class area got moved to Westfield tantrums and gets themselves moved back (except for the low income neighborhoods who are just being used as pawns at this point.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the other proposed maps in the other versions had Westfield with a more reasonable population-at least 23-400 students by pulling from Lees Corner, or Bull Run, or the Walney area, etc. This "final" map is the only one that dipped all the way down to @2000. I'm sure the Westfield people were taken aback by that.

Where were all the people thinking an enrollment of 2300 or 2400 kids is "reasonable" when FCPS was refusing to invest in other schools and downsizing them? If Westfield ends up with 2150 kids or so, it will still have an enrollment larger than nine other high schools, including Skyview.

The projection has it at only 2083, which is fewer than 2150, with the only MC neighborhood being rezoned lobbying FCPS hard to get out. There's no chance they add more kids in but based on the shenanigans so far, there's a likely chance they move kids back to Chantilly, which would leave them with 1900 or fewer.

You're right that the projection has Westfield at 2083, not 2150. That's still higher than nine other high schools based on all the boundary adjustments adopted and proposed: Herndon, Marshall, South County, Falls Church, Annandale, South Lakes, Mount Vernon, Skyview, and Lewis.

Interesting that this list of smallest schools also includes all the academic have-not schools people are desperate to avoid in FCPS and that FCPS ignores and refuses to improve. They are deliberately moving Westfield from a regular middle of the pack school down to the bottom tier of Avoid at All Cost schools.

If the only thing keeping Westfield in the middle of the pack was all those kids north of 50, then this was inevitable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the other proposed maps in the other versions had Westfield with a more reasonable population-at least 23-400 students by pulling from Lees Corner, or Bull Run, or the Walney area, etc. This "final" map is the only one that dipped all the way down to @2000. I'm sure the Westfield people were taken aback by that.

Where were all the people thinking an enrollment of 2300 or 2400 kids is "reasonable" when FCPS was refusing to invest in other schools and downsizing them? If Westfield ends up with 2150 kids or so, it will still have an enrollment larger than nine other high schools, including Skyview.

The projection has it at only 2083, which is fewer than 2150, with the only MC neighborhood being rezoned lobbying FCPS hard to get out. There's no chance they add more kids in but based on the shenanigans so far, there's a likely chance they move kids back to Chantilly, which would leave them with 1900 or fewer.

You're right that the projection has Westfield at 2083, not 2150. That's still higher than nine other high schools based on all the boundary adjustments adopted and proposed: Herndon, Marshall, South County, Falls Church, Annandale, South Lakes, Mount Vernon, Skyview, and Lewis.

Interesting that this list of smallest schools also includes all the academic have-not schools people are desperate to avoid in FCPS and that FCPS ignores and refuses to improve. They are deliberately moving Westfield from a regular middle of the pack school down to the bottom tier of Avoid at All Cost schools.

If the only thing keeping Westfield in the middle of the pack was all those kids north of 50, then this was inevitable.

There is nothing special about those particular 1000+ kids. Moving back in a similar mix of 500-600 kids would keep Westfield afloat. FCPS is refusing to do that.