Anonymous wrote:
He was the CEO of Cantor-Fitzgerald. He couldn’t stay away from cameras during the recovery from 9-11. I was always suspicious when he was propped up as a compassionate CEO. My childhood best friend’s cousin was among the dead C-F employees. I only met him when he was small.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe the files were too valuable to have been destroyed. Either the CIA or Mossad us currently using those files, if not for financial extortion, then for influence or to enforce silence. And the files are only valuable if kept secret, hence they will never be released
which is why someone needs to leak them -- to undermine their blackmail value.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else think that no one has released the files because enough high powered execs and politicians are involved that releasing the info could result in an economic and/or political meltdown?
I actually think clearing the decks in congress by removing all these jerks on both sides would be the best thing for America.
Who are the "both sides" here? Serious question.
The dems are all for transparency and have offered bill after bill to release the files and resolution for testimony from participants and witnesses.
Ah yes, Democrats are so eager to expose Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, and all the Ivy League and MIT celebrity faculty he ensnared.![]()
Have you heard one democrat against releasing the files?
Yawn. It’s fake theater because they know it’s not happening. Biden could have released it. Show us all the efforts by libs in 2020-2024 to release everything.
Exactly this. It rings a bit hollow when they had the last 4 years to clamor for release under the Biden admin and were totally silent. But I do agree that there is something very nefarious afoot.
Ikr? Biden doesn't release it. Why? And now Trump won't release it. Why?
Now everybody wants to see it, so let's see it. Democrats want to see it. Republicans want to see it Independents want to see it. Maga wants to see it. It is the only thing that's unifying the country right now so let's see it.
Context is sort of important. when Biden took office, we were in the middle of a pandemic and J6 had just happened. The adminnistration had to get legislation through to help rebuild the economy and had to clean up the various messes Trump left. Epstein at that point was no where near the top or middle of the agenda. And at the time, there were not really people clamoring for the release like they are now. In fact, I would argue that the only reason it is an issue is because Trump made it one while he was running for office and MAGA is now calling him out for it. the dems have never said they wanted to protect Bill Clinton or anyone else who might be on the list.
Anonymous wrote:I believe the files were too valuable to have been destroyed. Either the CIA or Mossad us currently using those files, if not for financial extortion, then for influence or to enforce silence. And the files are only valuable if kept secret, hence they will never be released
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Trump judge overturns WA state's new law requiring priests to report child abuse disclosed in confession.
This should have been overturned. Confession is sacrosanct and if priests are required to report child abuse then they can be required to report rape, murder. Infidelity.
Infidelity is not illegal. A murder victim is incapable of reporting his or her murder in confession. An adult rape victim is capable of being counseled to report his or her rape to authorities. Children are not considered to have that same capacity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The list” is a red herring — there was certainly a cache of blackmail VIDEOS featuring some of the most powerful Americans engaging in God knows what depravity.
No one cares if it's called a list or a cache or a collection or pile or a bag or a box or a bunch... Just release it whatever it is. If it's written, the people can read it. If it's on video the people can watch it. If it's audio the people can listen to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Trump judge overturns WA state's new law requiring priests to report child abuse disclosed in confession.
This should have been overturned. Confession is sacrosanct and if priests are required to report child abuse then they can be required to report rape, murder. Infidelity.
Infidelity is not illegal. A murder victim is incapable of reporting his or her murder in confession. An adult rape victim is capable of being counseled to report his or her rape to authorities. Children are not considered to have that same capacity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Trump judge overturns WA state's new law requiring priests to report child abuse disclosed in confession.
This should have been overturned. Confession is sacrosanct and if priests are required to report child abuse then they can be required to report rape, murder. Infidelity.
Infidelity is not illegal. A murder victim is incapable of reporting his or her murder in confession. An adult rape victim is capable of being counseled to report his or her rape to authorities. Children are not considered to have that same capacity.