Anonymous
12/13/2025 08:58
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
You're an idiot. Look at the neighborhoods where people live, moron.
Why are you triggered?
I know exactly where they live. Crossfield families do not live closer to Western than the other neighborhood. On average, they’re the farthest.
Crossfield’s westernmost neighborhood is roughly as close as the others. But the eastern neighborhoods (east of Lawyer’s Rd) are farther than any other elementary schools. No Crossfield families live west of 286, and they all have to cross it to get to Western High.
FCPS never dropped SPA counts except for these non Thru studies: Coates, Parklawn, and the older Kent Gardens. Coates borders Loudoun and is a logical feed from Westfield to Western. Logic removed any Crossfield from the Coates study but included Fox Mill which had over 30% of K-6 pre any transfers generated from households west of 286, Fairfax County Parkway.
Meren may not like that fact but could pick up the Westbriar Island assigned to Marshall in scenario 4. Also could get South Lakes replacements from some Madison and Langley in this cycle. Gibson populated South Lakes with a Madison Island years ago.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 00:03
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
You're an idiot. Look at the neighborhoods where people live, moron.
Why are you triggered?
I know exactly where they live. Crossfield families do not live closer to Western than the other neighborhood. On average, they’re the farthest.
Crossfield’s westernmost neighborhood is roughly as close as the others. But the eastern neighborhoods (east of Lawyer’s Rd) are farther than any other elementary schools. No Crossfield families live west of 286, and they all have to cross it to get to Western High.
+1
Anonymous
12/12/2025 23:39
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
You're an idiot. Look at the neighborhoods where people live, moron.
Is it really necessary to resort to this level of aggression? These Crossfield conversations are getting carried away.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 23:39
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
You're an idiot. Look at the neighborhoods where people live, moron.
Why are you triggered?
I know exactly where they live. Crossfield families do not live closer to Western than the other neighborhood. On average, they’re the farthest.
Crossfield’s westernmost neighborhood is roughly as close as the others. But the eastern neighborhoods (east of Lawyer’s Rd) are farther than any other elementary schools. No Crossfield families live west of 286, and they all have to cross it to get to Western High.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 23:32
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
So, all the Crossfield kids live at the school? You do know some of them live pretty close to 286/West Ox Rd--less than two miles from Carson? Some are near 286/Franklin Farm Rd. In other words, a very large portion of Crossfield kids live VERY near the new school.
So, the distance is a wash.
But, the fact remains, it makes no sense to send them to Oakton.
I’m not disputing your view on whether or not Crossfield should attend Oakton or not. However, all the boundary review discussions have focused on the distance between ES and HS not individual neighborhoods. Crossfield is being considered for rezoning to Western because it slightly beats out Navy for furtherest ES away from Oakton.
Wow. This is actually....not accurate. At all.
Not op but for the most part it is.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 22:39
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
So, all the Crossfield kids live at the school? You do know some of them live pretty close to 286/West Ox Rd--less than two miles from Carson? Some are near 286/Franklin Farm Rd. In other words, a very large portion of Crossfield kids live VERY near the new school.
So, the distance is a wash.
But, the fact remains, it makes no sense to send them to Oakton.
I’m not disputing your view on whether or not Crossfield should attend Oakton or not. However, all the boundary review discussions have focused on the distance between ES and HS not individual neighborhoods. Crossfield is being considered for rezoning to Western because it slightly beats out Navy for furtherest ES away from Oakton.
Wow. This is actually....not accurate. At all.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 22:38
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
You're an idiot. Look at the neighborhoods where people live, moron.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 22:37
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
So, all the Crossfield kids live at the school? You do know some of them live pretty close to 286/West Ox Rd--less than two miles from Carson? Some are near 286/Franklin Farm Rd. In other words, a very large portion of Crossfield kids live VERY near the new school.
So, the distance is a wash.
But, the fact remains, it makes no sense to send them to Oakton.
I’m not disputing your view on whether or not Crossfield should attend Oakton or not. However, all the boundary review discussions have focused on the distance between ES and HS not individual neighborhoods. Crossfield is being considered for rezoning to Western because it slightly beats out Navy for furtherest ES away from Oakton.
OMG, we are not talking about the location of the school, we're talking about where people live. Look at school boundaries. Most Crossfield families also live closer to several other elementary schools than they live to Crossfield. It's in a weird location. So yes, a lot of us live closer to Western than families that go to Coates and McNair even if the schools themselves are physically closer.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 22:36
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 21:01
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
So, all the Crossfield kids live at the school? You do know some of them live pretty close to 286/West Ox Rd--less than two miles from Carson? Some are near 286/Franklin Farm Rd. In other words, a very large portion of Crossfield kids live VERY near the new school.
So, the distance is a wash.
But, the fact remains, it makes no sense to send them to Oakton.
I’m not disputing your view on whether or not Crossfield should attend Oakton or not. However, all the boundary review discussions have focused on the distance between ES and HS not individual neighborhoods. Crossfield is being considered for rezoning to Western because it slightly beats out Navy for furtherest ES away from Oakton.
Strongly disagree that they are focused on the location of the school itself. And, in any case, the neighborhoods are even further away from Oakton. Look at the Crossfield boundary map. It is clearly at the very far edge of most of its population.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 20:20
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
So, all the Crossfield kids live at the school? You do know some of them live pretty close to 286/West Ox Rd--less than two miles from Carson? Some are near 286/Franklin Farm Rd. In other words, a very large portion of Crossfield kids live VERY near the new school.
So, the distance is a wash.
But, the fact remains, it makes no sense to send them to Oakton.
I’m not disputing your view on whether or not Crossfield should attend Oakton or not. However, all the boundary review discussions have focused on the distance between ES and HS not individual neighborhoods. Crossfield is being considered for rezoning to Western because it slightly beats out Navy for furtherest ES away from Oakton.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 20:09
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
So, all the Crossfield kids live at the school? You do know some of them live pretty close to 286/West Ox Rd--less than two miles from Carson? Some are near 286/Franklin Farm Rd. In other words, a very large portion of Crossfield kids live VERY near the new school.
So, the distance is a wash.
But, the fact remains, it makes no sense to send them to Oakton.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 19:22
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Of course Western is closer than Oakton. We all get that.
But Crossfield is not closer to Western than the other elementary schools, and it’s not a wash.
Get your facts straight.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 18:51
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.
Some of its neighborhoods are closer. But, it is pretty much a wash.
One thing for sure: Crossfield neighborhoods are way less than half the distance to Oakton--and, time wise, probably even probably a third less.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 18:33
Subject: Re:Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Crossfield is on the boundary area for the Western School. Crossfield is one of the schools with a weird boundary that makes it hard to know where the kids should go. Oakton is not one of the schools that is being targeted for reducing the student body population. It is easier for the families that want to stay at Oakton to fight for that.
NOT ONE person in Crossfield boundary is closer to Oakton than the new school-not by a long shot. With one neighborhood exception, they all go to Carson. The others go to Hughes.
It is not a borderline issue--unless you wish to make it borderline with South Lakes--which is also much closer to Crossfield families than Oakton.
I didn't say Oakton was closer to Crossfield then Oakton. I said Crossfield is on the outer edge of the area being considered for the Western HS. The comment was that people at Oak Hill wanted to stay at Chantilly and knew they didn't have the choice but the Crossfield families at Oakton might be able to stay at Oakton. My response was that Oak Hill is geographically closer to the Western HS then Crossfield is and that Crossfield is on the edge of the boundary area the County is considering. I didn't say that there were not closer HS to Crossfield, only that Oak Hill is the closest ES to Western and is at a HS that is overcrowded.
Most Crossfield neighborhoods are closer to Western than Coates and McNair, and many are closer than the eastern part of Fox Mill Estates.
I get that you want your Crossfield kids go to Western. But Crossfield is not closer to Western than Coates and McNair.